Talk:Yuri Shcherbinin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 23:16, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shcherbinin in 2010
Shcherbinin in 2010

Created by CurryTime7-24 (talk). Self-nominated at 07:08, 27 November 2022 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article is new, long enough and neutral. It cites sources inline. "Earwig's Copyvio Detector " does not report any ext similarities since all the sources are in foreign language. References #1, #2, #3, #5, #6 and #11 can not be accessed. Hooks are well-formatted. Their length is within limit. I find the original and ALt3 hook interesting. I AGF for their accuracy. Image is © -free. QPQ is missing. Will approve after the QPQ issue is addressed. CeeGee 12:24, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review! QPQ done. I just checked the refs. for this article and all work fine, including the archived links. Let me know if anything else needs to be sorted out. —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 16:27, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • QPQ done. Good to go with AGF. CeeGee 16:54, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Sctherbinin"?

The current version has, as its lead sentence, Yuri Leonidovich Shcherbinin (Russian: Ю́рий Леони́дович Щерби́нин, ...

Щ, both for its Russian pronunciation of /ɕː/ and it's Ukrainian pronunciation /ʃtʃ/. It looks like it'd be pronounced /skθ/, with a sound in neither language. Are we sure this isn't a typo of some sort? scht would be less weird, although still neither a common Russian nor Ukrainian romanization and still not rendering either of those sounds particularly well. If not a typo, is there a reference that uses that spelling? oatco (talk) 13:32, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

It confused me too, but according to his Wikimedia Commons user page, he wanted use of his images credited with this idiosyncratic spelling. — CurryTime7-24 (talk) 15:22, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]