Talk:Zygalski sheets

Cryptography: Computer science Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as Low-importance).

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rename as Zygalski sheets?

The title for this article of 'Perforated sheets' is, I contend, inappropriately generic, as there are other types of perforated sheets such as Hollerith

punched cards and 'Banburies' as used in Banburismus. Although Zygalski sheets were called Jeffreys sheets at Bletchley Park for security reasons, it seems to be clear that the perforated sheets prepared by John R.F. Jeffreys's section were, in essence, the same as those devised by Henryk Zygalski. Do other editors think that it would be appropriate to re-name (move) the article? --TedColes (talk) 15:39, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

I concur. A number of sources, Polish- and English-language, do call them "Zygalski sheets." It would make an appropriate eponym. Nihil novi (talk) 03:25, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Zygalski sheets. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck

}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:06, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]