Template:Did you know nominations/I Love You Colonel Sanders!

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as

the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know

), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:45, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

I Love You Colonel Sanders!

• ... that players attempt to win the love of the young, attractive
  I Love You Colonel Sanders!? Source: "Things got even weirder when the game was revealed to be a dating simulator with Colonel Sanders as the prized companion." ("I played KFC's bizarre Colonel Sanders dating game so you don't have to"
  )

Created/expanded by Akrabbim (talk). Self-nominated at 20:33, 4 February 2020 (UTC).

• WP:DYKRULES. -- RoySmith (talk)
  03:56, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Oh, no, wait. I was reviewing the wrong article. I was looking at

I Love You Colonel Sanders!. -- RoySmith (talk)

03:58, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Overall: There's a few hits on earwig for copied text, but it's mostly instances of "I Love You, Colonel Sanders! A Finger Lickin’ Good Dating Simulator", which is the formal name of the sim, so not a problem. -- RoySmith (talk) 04:12, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

• Rule C6. It is all plot. Please provide a new hook. Yoninah (talk
  ) 21:34, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

• I just looked over the article. While it is true that Colonel Sanders is a real-life person, the hook is written in a way that obscures that. A tweak of the hook wording would solve it. Alternately, the bolded link could be piped to say what it is (a dating sim). Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 21:37, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Hmm, how about this? —Aᴋʀᴀʙʙıᴍ ^talk 21:48, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

• ALT1: ... that the young, attractive, and date-able portrayal of
  I Love You Colonel Sanders! is part of an effort by KFC
  to make the Colonel a "part of pop-culture"?

• OK, but what about removing the repetition?
• ALT2: ... that the young, attractive, and date-able portrayal of
  a parody dating sim is part of an effort by KFC to make the Colonel a "part of pop culture"? Yoninah (talk
  ) 21:58, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

• You could also turn around the wording in ALT0:
• ALT0a: ... that in a 2019
  parody dating sim commissioned by KFC, players attempt to win the love of the young, attractive Colonel Sanders? Yoninah (talk
  ) 22:03, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

I don't see how ALT2 is an improvement over ALT1, but I'm fine with it if you think it's better. I think it's hookier than ALT0 and 0a. —Aᴋʀᴀʙʙıᴍ ^talk 22:07, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

• Well, ALT1 has the word Colonel three times and Sanders twice. ALT2 has two Colonel and one Sanders :) Pinging @RoySmith: to review ALT2. Yoninah (talk) 22:20, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

• I'm a newbie when it comes to DYK (and particularly DYK reviews). With that in mind, it seems kind of wordy to me. How about:
• ALT2a: ... that the young, attractive, and date-able
  a parody dating sim is part of an effort by KFC to make him a "part of pop culture"? -- RoySmith (talk)
  23:38, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

• I agree, ALT2 is clearer. Yoninah (talk) 15:31, 12 February 2020 (UTC)