Template:Did you know nominations/Imadaddin Nasimi
<
Template:Did you know nominations
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:29, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Imadaddin Nasimi
- ... that the 14th and 15th century Azerbaijani poet Imadaddin Nasimi was possibly flayed alive after being accused of being a kafir by Sunni scholars? Source: https://referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopaedia-of-islam-3/*-COM_40738 "Most sources state that Nǝsimi was executed for his statements about religion, and sometimes he is even termed a kāfir (unbeliever). [...] Contrary to many legends, the sources give no clear indication that Nǝsimi was executed by being flayed alive. Some texts do mention flaying, but it was possibly carried out postmortem, and most likely with the aim of preserving body parts for public exhibition."
Created by Golden (talk). Self-nominated at 10:20, 6 July 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Imadaddin Nasimi; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
On hold. Everything else checks out but I cannot verify the hook's source, it is behind a paywall. Shearonink (talk) 22:08, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- @) 10:25, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Kusma Thank you, that's very helpful. The source is still behind a paywall though for unregistered/most readers...I'm not sure if a DYK can be passed through if the source for the hook is inaccessible. Does anyone in DYK-land know? Shearonink (talk) 14:37, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Shearonink: We do accept hooks where the source is inaccessible, for example if it is in a paper book with no online version. We only expect the nominator to provide a full quote supporting the source on request (you can also ask for a scan to be sent by e-mail). If you have been unable to check the source yourself, but are satisfied with the nominator's explanation, you can use {{subst:DYKtickAGF}} to produce a grey tick instead of a green one. —Kusma (talk) 15:00, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Kusma Ah, ok, that makes sense. Thanks for the explanation & speedy response - muchly appreciated. Oh it'll get a green check from me - I deleted my previous "inaccessible source" statement from the review template. Shearonink (talk) 15:08, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Shearonink: We do accept hooks where the source is inaccessible, for example if it is in a paper book with no online version. We only expect the nominator to provide a full quote supporting the source on request (you can also ask for a scan to be sent by e-mail). If you have been unable to check the source yourself, but are satisfied with the nominator's explanation, you can use {{subst:DYKtickAGF}} to produce a grey tick instead of a green one. —Kusma (talk) 15:00, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Kusma Thank you, that's very helpful. The source is still behind a paywall though for unregistered/most readers...I'm not sure if a DYK can be passed through if the source for the hook is inaccessible. Does anyone in DYK-land know? Shearonink (talk) 14:37, 10 July 2023 (UTC)