Template:Did you know nominations/Ink wash painting

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Template:Did you know nominations
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kingsif (talk) 20:09, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Ink wash painting

Liang Kai (Chinese: 梁楷, 1140-1210), Drunken Celestial (Chinese: 潑墨仙人), ink on Xuan paper, 12th century, Southern Song (Chinese), National Palace Museum, Taipei
Liang Kai (Chinese: 梁楷, 1140-1210), Drunken Celestial (Chinese: 潑墨仙人), ink on Xuan paper, 12th century, Southern Song (Chinese), National Palace Museum, Taipei

Improved to Good Article status by Jujiang (talk). Self-nominated at at 04:22, 29 July 2021 (UTC).

  • (Please note this is not a review) Jujiang, I don't think you're supposed to put Written by multiple authors, but rather the actual authors as that might mess things up for the bot. You should probably change it to the actual users who got to to GA-status and adjust the {{DYKmake}} template as well. Thanks. Pamzeis (talk) 08:31, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments.  Done (I don't know how to express the hard work of many wikis people😀)--Jujiang (talk) 13:02, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
  • GA expansion approved for DYK but the hooks needs some work. The main claims this appeared in the 7th century but this is not confirmed by the body, all I see is that "Ink wash painting appeared during the Tang dynasty (618–907)" - that's a four-century range. One of the creators is Wang Wei (Tang dynasty) who lived in the 8th, not 7th century. ALT1 should be discarded as well as irredimable (charming is subjective and the term is not even used in the article). ALT2 is ok but full of rather excessive detail; I'd suggest correcting the data in main hook to the 8th century (and also please add the 8th century data to the lead); then this will be GTG. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:43, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus, Thanks for your comments.  Done. --Jujiang (talk) 03:52, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Main hook approved (not the alts). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:57, 2 August 2021 (UTC)