Template:Did you know nominations/Kai-Tai Fang

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Template:Did you know nominations
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know
), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 00:31, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Kai-Tai Fang

Professor Pao-Lu Hsu
Professor Pao-Lu Hsu
Tsingtao Beer
Tsingtao Beer
  • ... that the statistician
    Kai-Tai Fang's dissertation was written in two weeks under the supervision of Professor Pao-Lu Hsu (pictured) but not published for nineteen years—because of the Cultural Revolution
    ?

Created by 162.250.169.162 (talk). Self nominated at 12:25, 15 September 2016 (UTC).

  • He didn't "promote statistically designed experiments", he designed experiments, though as a leading statistician he was also in a position to encourage others to do so:
ALT2: ... that the statistician
Kai-Tai Fang designed experiments to improve Tsingtao Beer (pictured) during the Cultural Revolution? Quote: "When did you learn orthogonal design and start conducting experiments with this method? ... In 1972 I had the opportunity to go to the Tsingdao Beer Factory and other factories. I supervised the engineers there to apply orthogonal design to industrial experiements." [1]
EEng 17:24, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Wait, I think this is hookier:
ALT3 ... that
Kai-Tai Fang used statistics to improve Tsingtao Beer (pictured) during the Cultural Revolution
? See ALT2 quote
EEng 20:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
EEng ALT3 would need a link for statistics, since the source says "orthogonal design" and not everyone knows what that is. — Maile (talk) 20:25, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Well, as luck would have it I have a degree in statistics so we're well armed in that direction. However, I've unlinked orthogonal design to make it an undefined mystery to intrigue the beer-drinking reader. Back on A3, it's by no means inappropriate SYNTH to note that this statistician was employing statistics. EEng 22:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
162.250.169.162 (talk) 08:59, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Just as an aside here. I think the beer hook, however it gets worked out, is the most hooky. — Maile (talk) 22:32, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
    Why?
    I would prefer that we use the first hook, which indicates the importance of the Cultural Revolution by noting one effect of it on a Chinese academic. Hsu is very famous mathematical statistician, and having a DYK mentioning two Chinese academics would be refreshing.
    As noted above statistics had been applied to beer since Gossett ("Student") of Guiness, so the beer hooks really don't explain why Fang's work was interesting. It would be useful for somebody to search for more reliable sources about Fang and beer, e.g., to explain in the article what was meant by "orthogonal design". Also, the beer advising does not give insight into the Cultural Revolution. 162.250.169.162 (talk) 08:59, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
A hook is a means to an end, not the end itself. The hook's job is to intrigue the reader enough that he clicks on the article, where if we're lucky he'll learn something about the Cultural Revolution. Beer will do that well (and for those if us who know staristics and enjoy it, the fact that beer-history repeats itself is a draw as well.) EEng 09:09, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
To answer the "why" I prefer the beer hook, is from a non-Chinese point of view, the concept that anything was put on the back shelf during the Cultural Revolution is more of a given than something that will grab the reader in. This may be incredibly fascinating to anyone of mainland China's culture, or a student of that period, but it really isn't an attention grabber for the general audience. If this becomes a lead hook, the image serves to help grab the attention of the reader. The concept of a statistician being actively employed to improve beer production is off-beat enough to make a reader want to know more. — Maile (talk) 12:21, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Just to say it before our friend jumps in to lecture us again, as it happens beer features in one of the fun chapters (and there are many, indeed) in the history of statistics, which is part of why it's fun, for those in the know, to see it pop up again here. See William_Sealy_Gosset. EEng 06:57, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
I am sorry if you took my tone as lecturing. Our discussion had resulted in removing the OR-disambiguation of "orthogonal design" from one of the hooks, which seemed like progress. Now, like Solomon Lefschetz, the article's DYK nomination has two working hooks.
So does this complete the review? Is one of the hooks ready to go on the DYK section of the main page? 162.250.169.162 (talk) 12:05, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

WP:DYKR. — Maile (talk
) 12:13, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

  • I am promoting the approved original hook, in a shortened form without mentioning his supervisor, because the article does not make a direct connection between orthogonal design and the beer company; instead, it describes his orthogonal design work in a vague and collective sort of way. Instead, the article connects the beer company with design of experiments. And I am not promoting it with the image, per Pgallert's last comment. Yoninah (talk) 00:31, 29 September 2016 (UTC)