Template talk:Atonement in Christianity

	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Christianity: Theology / Arminianism This template is supported by theology work group. This template is supported by WikiProject Arminianism (assessed as Low-importance).

List has been alphabetized. Could be organized by prevalence in modern thought, or chronologically (by earliest distinct mention, i.e. Ransom/Recapitulation from Irenaeus, Christus Victor from Chrysostom, Athanasius or the Cappadocians, Satisfaction from Anselm [as Augustine isn't clear in his mention of it, he's mainly Christus Victor still], etc.). Also, divinization/theosis is an understanding of salvation among Eastern Orthodox, but is not a theory of the atonement - it is a theory of salvation or soteriology, held together with the Orthodox theory of the atonement, which is Christus Victor. St John Chrysostom ^Δόξα_{τω ^Θεώ} 09:23, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto this template:

Part of a series on
Atonement in Christianity
Theories Classic paradigm
Ransom (Patristic)
Christus Victor (20th century)
Recapitulation (Patristic) Objective paradigm
Satisfaction (Scholastic / Anselmian)
Reformed / Arminian )
Governmental (Arminian) Subjective paradigm
Moral influence (Mixed)
Moral example (Socinian)
Types
Limited (Scholastic / Reformed)
Unlimited (E. Orthodox / Catholic / Arminian)
v t e

I have a problem with this template, as not all Arminians subscribe to a governmental view of atonement. The

under limited atonement it lists the reformed and scholastic view but I dont think the scholastic theolgians believed in limited atonementIlikerabbits! (talk) 09:10, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]