Template talk:Shades of violet

This template was considered for deletion on 8 October 2021. The result of the discussion was "no consensus".

Visual arts Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

LGBT studies Template‑class

This template is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

For the approximations I used a sample of the colors from the Durham University webpage for palatinate. A sample of the color in the picture Image:Iris latifolia.jpg for iris, and the color purple for purpure. PaleAqua 05:48, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with the shade for palatinate, is that no one seems to be really quite sure what colour palatinate actually is. My understanding is that it's quite a bit paler than the shade currently used by the University of Durham's PR department and on the website; certainly, if you visit Durham, you will see several different shades in common usage. Apparently the colour originally derives from cloth on Bishop Van Mildert's coat, but these may be faded over time and I cannot say I have ever seen a "true" sample of the colour myself to confirm. DWaterson 20:04, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The colour on this page is the one currently used in the University logo, but is a shade that wasn't particularly commonly in use until the rebrand last year. The shade described as palatinate in the University's academic dress is substantially paler - see here (the hood lining colour) - more like what's currently described as mauve or orchid. This isn't the nicest purple in the world, though, so other purples are often used instead of it in other circumstances. I suspect that the most authoritative palatinate would be the one on the academic dress - I don't think that the new University logo colour is claimed to be palatinate, merely purple - but I don't think there's an official definition. TSP 14:16, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still wondering what the best approach is too handle colors with out a standard color swatch, especially palatinate, iris and purpure. I noticed someone else removed the approximate label I had placed on the swatches. If we are going to use navigational templates it would be nice to have all the colors that apply in them. I noticed that other similar templates do not include all the colors from there category. Perhaps, put the colors without swatches at the bottom or omit them. PaleAqua 08:07, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions have been made to move and/or split this template to Template:Shades/Variations/Varieties of violet/purple. Jimp 00:52, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Compare these.

Which is better? Jimp 07:05, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer the 2nd version myself. An older version of this template did have a similar layout though it used approximate colors for the swatches. I believe this is the only navigation that includes colors without swatches. I'd also recommend taking any discussion on these templates to Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Color. PaleAqua 15:22, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's the only one in Category:Shades of color to do so, although, Template:Shades of grey should probably also have them (my fault). I will mention this on the talk page you mention. Jimp 16:29, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed Template:Shades of grey up using this style. Jimp 18:28, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]