User:Avicennasis/todo

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.


Requests for
bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)
Usernames for administrator attention


Bot-reported

User-reported

Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Despicable Me 4

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Hello, various users have been repeatedly removing the plot, stating that it contains spoiler or that the film was not released in the US. Can we protect the page until the said release July, 3 to avoid constant reverts and inappropriate comments (see my talk, page and page history)? Thank you. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 18:11, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Not done There's no level of protection short of full protection that would stop the edit warring, and I think there would be too much collateral. I've watchlisted to see if that changes, and I hope you'll report any further inappropriate comments at the ongoing ANI thread. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 20:00, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply and explanation. Best, -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 20:53, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Nicolas Batum

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent

vandalism – Due to a recent news flurry on the article subject, IP editors have begun to change the article. Looks like a week or 10 days protection may do it. Geoff | Who, me?
21:40, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Patrick Shyu

Reason: Repeated violations of

WP:BLP by IPs AndyTheGrump (talk
) 22:13, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. /64 blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:57, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Saeed Hatteea

Semi-protection: Persistent

Walsh90210 (talk
) 22:41, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

User talk:Jdcomix

Semi-protection: Persistent

vandalism. Jdcomix (talk
) 23:10, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:36, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

2010 Atlantic hurricane season

Reason: The extended confirmed protection is no longer necessary because the autoconfirmed vandalism-only account that vandalized the page in October 2022 probably won't come back to this article. I would suggest reducing it to semi-protection or unprotecting the page entirely. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 21:09, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Whoops, I did not discuss with the protecting admin first. I did not see that note until after submitting this. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 21:10, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Well, you still haven't notified him, so now I shall have to do so. @
Cryptic: how say you? Favonian (talk
) 15:19, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Elizabethan era

Reason: Page has been protected for some years now and there seems to be no apparent issues still. 2A0A:EF40:E4A:E101:F1D0:B8C5:6F4F:ABB1 (talk) 00:03, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Page has been protected since 2017. 2A0A:EF40:E4A:E101:F1D0:B8C5:6F4F:ABB1 (talk) 00:09, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
@Materialscientist What do you think? 2A0A:EF40:E4A:E101:F1D0:B8C5:6F4F:ABB1 (talk) 00:18, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.


John_Roberts

Change "He has been described as having a moderate conservative judicial philosophy" to "he was once described as having a moderate conservative judicial philosophy, but has since proven to be otherwise." citation: https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/07/justices-rule-trump-has-some-immunity-from-prosecution/ Jajor36 (talk) 23:07, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Requests for permissions

User:Avicennasis/todo/Header

Current requests

Account creator


Autopatrolled

User:Xegma

Hello there, I have created 30 articles as of now and i am requesting for Autopatrolled right. Xegma(talk) 07:34, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

User:C1K98V

Hello, I have created 100+ articles, primarily focused on television series. And I plan to keep doing the same. Thanks for your consideration C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Link to previous request. (I have no opinion at this time.) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:36, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Extraordinary Writ, I appreciate it. Thanks for looking into my request. — C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 05:50, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Joe Roe, you declined this previously. Do you want to have another look? Schwede66 06:42, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
I'm sorry I don't have time to look at this properly right now. I'm happy for another admin to process it as they see fit. – Joe (talk) 09:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Joe Roe, I appreciate it. Thanks for looking into my request. — C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:47, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Roastedbeanz1

I have written a total of 48 articles, including 6 in the past 2 days, mainly about hip hop artists. My articles usually have little to no issue. I'm requesting for the autopatrolled right to lighten the amount of unreviewed articles. Roasted; (talk), c. 00:07, 19 June 2023 (CDT)

 Not done, sorry. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wacotron looks like it's heading for deletion and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Overtaxation of the United States was not that long ago. – Joe (talk) 09:55, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Horse Eye's Back

Because NPP is the first line of systemic bias on wiki, exempting even just my creations from NPP is an improvement. In my own experience NPP has been a net negative, while I'm sure it is useful in some cases at some point my article creations aren't those. My creation history is beyond reproach, I have even been solicitied to join NPP on multiple occasions but have repeatedly declined on ideological grounds (I don't join paramilitary organization like the NPP). Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

 Done Rlendog (talk) 16:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
@Rlendog: This is your first edit to this page since 2009 and the first time you have ever granted a perm to another user, and it is to accept, without discussion or explanation, six minutes after it was made, a request for an exemption to NPP that calls it a "net negative" and "paramilitary organization". That's rather odd. Would you mind explaining what brought you here and your thought process in handling this request a bit further? – Joe (talk) 09:31, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) I wholly share Joe's concerns here, even putting aside the extraordinary speed this was seemingly actioned, but to not challenge someone who clearly has some significant underlying issues with the page patrolling process seems to be an oversight. The appellant's expressed opinions on the process and their desire to bypass it entirely, with that rationale, warrants scrutiny. Bungle (talkcontribs) 13:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
I reviewed several of his new articles and did not see any issues. Rlendog (talk) 21:12, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
I've also been familiar with this editor's editing for a while, and while I think there have been issues with some of his edits to noticeboards, I have not seen any issues with his new pages. Rlendog (talk) 21:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
You don't see an issue with the NPP is a paramilitary organization comment then? – 
talk
) 05:31, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
I have problems with the way this editor sometimes interacts with other editors, including overzealous language. But those problems are not with his editing of articles, creation of new articles, or with his knowledge of our guidelines and policies. If anything, they are overzealous in discussing those guidelines and policies, which is my impression of his depiction of NPP.
My experience with this editor goes back to January/February 2023, in a discussion at ANI regarding AfDs of certain football players. I thought some of their comments were inappropriate, particularly disparaging one particular editor involved in the discussion. He also made at least one uncomplimentary comment about me. Given that I was involved, and that the long discussion at ANI was plenty visible to many admins, I did not take any action regarding the HEB's disparaging comments at the time. But I did review their edits to ensure that they were not just trolling, and found that their edits to articles were fine and that they can be helpful to other editors who ask for assistance on their talk page. And since I was concerned that their aggressive comments about other editors may be a pattern, I saved some of the diffs from that ANI discussion in case issues arose later.
I've had a few other interactions with them since. In a discussion in late 2023 there were more interactions between HEB and the editor they disparaged in early 2023, in which HEB made at least one more condescending comment about the other editor. There was also an ANI around the same time about HEB's behavior in which that other editor linked the page containing my diffs from the previous ANI. I don't think I participated in the later ANI (if I did my participation was minimal), since the evidence I would have had to offer had already been linked, but I checked HEB's contributions again and did not find anything wrong with his article editing, and again saw their willingness to help others, albeit sometimes caustically, which is another reason I chose to not participate (or minimally participate) in the new ANI. After that ANI ended with no action against HEB, HEB requested that the diff page be speedy deleted. But as an admin, you are able to see it: User:Rlendog/Sandbox6.
There is one more incident I recall interacting with HEB on, where they made a disparaging remark about an editor who created an article about a sportsperson (I think an ice hockey player) that was at AfD. In that case the article pretty clearly did not meet our current notability guidelines, but had met the notability guidelines that were in place when the article was created. So I commented (not sure if it was on the AfD or on their talk page) that HEB ought to be careful about disparaging editors who created articles that were perfectly legitimate under guidelines then in effect, even if those guidelines subsequently changed.
But none of my interactions or reviews of their contributions indicated any issues with their editing or creation of articles, or with their knowledge of our current guidelines or policies; in fact, my only concern with their knowledge is their overzealousness in enforcing them. So when this request came up on my Watchlist, I was surprised that they didn't already have Autopatrol rights. I actually came to the page wondering if they were disparaging someone for requesting Autopatrol. When I saw it was they requesting, I checked some of their recent creations to make sure their wasn't a problem, and granted the rights. I am sure that they are aware that if they abuse the right it will be removed. And if you think I was mistaken in granting the right, I have no problem with you removing it. But while I think there are sometimes issues with the way they interact with others, those are not issues with article creation. And while it is possible that their interaction issues may one day get them banned or blocked, as long as they remain editors in good standing, I am comfortable with them being Autopatrolled (but again, you may have more experience granting this right, and if I erred feel free to overturn it). Rlendog (talk) 18:53, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

AutoWikiBrowser


User:Swiss512

Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights :

I would like to have the AutoWikiBrowser/JavaScript Wiki Browser to make edits faster to fix redirects for the correct names of railway stations and also to make faster edits for updating adjacent stations due to the renaming of some railway services in Switzerland. Swiss512 (talk) 16:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Per
WP:NOTBROKEN this is not a good use of AWB. Primefac (talk
) 14:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
I want to cancel my request. Thanks Swiss512 (talk) 15:25, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Marking  Request withdrawn for the bot. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Zhing'za zï Ïnin‬

I want to use AWB to replace raster graphics with vector graphics. ⇒ Zhing-Za, they/them, 19:43, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Wiiformii

Hello, I am requesting AWB rights to fix spelling mistakes, more specifically names without accents, such as Raul Castro (Supposed to be spelt Raúl Castro) as seen in these pages Raul Castro and I often copy edit random pages and AWB would make these accent fixes and copy editing small grammar mistakes easier and more efficient, Wiiformii (talk) 22:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Path slopu

Greetings. I previously had AWB permission, but it was revoked due to inactivity. I would like to request access to it again to continue my works. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 17:29, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had their access to AutoWikiBrowser automatically revoked ([1]). MusikBot talk 17:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Garsh2

Hello! I am requesting access to the AWB to make typo correction, categorization, and other readability improvements a much quicker and easier process. I meet the 500 mainspace edits requirement, and my recent work with AfC and Ultraviolet demonstrates that I can use powerful tools responsibly. Garsh (talk) 23:50, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Omnis Scientia

I would like access to AWB for help with categorization. Specifically, diffusing large categories is quite difficult to do manually. Omnis Scientia (talk) 14:28, 1 July 2024 (UTC)



Confirmed


Event coordinator


Extended confirmed

User:Scoria.

Met all criteria Scoria. (talk) 10:57, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

 Already done (automated response) by Scoria.. MusikBot talk 12:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

File mover


Mass message sender

User:Path slopu

It's been a long time! I'm reaching out to request access to MMS permissions again, which were revoked due to inactivity. I'd like to continue working on my previous projects. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 09:49, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 12:45, 29 June 2024 (UTC)


New page reviewer

User:Extorc

I have more than 6000 edits as an editor over a time period of around 3 years. I have created several pages which I continue to maintain and have participated in processes like Request for moves and closures as well. Iv taken initiative in Anti-Vandalism work. I can help reduce the backlog. >>> Extorc.talk 14:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

User:SafariScribe

I am requesting the NPP rights to continue as part of my volunteer work in reviewing new pages. Thanks. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 20:43, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Hey man im josh (expires 00:00, 23 June 2024 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 20:50, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

User:48JCL

I’ve reviewed pages on the new pages feed. In fact, I have sometimes CSD or redirected (because it’s a duplicate article) before NPRs, please consider me. 48JCL 12:44, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Cowboygilbert

I am requesting NPP rights to be able to help out with reviewing new pages and to potentially help fix new pages. Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 04:18, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

User:HRShami

I want to reduce the massive backlog. I have been looking at the new pages patrol feed sporadically for the past two months and the backlog keeps increasing. I want to play a part in reviewing the articles. HRShami (talk) 11:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

User:CanonNi

Hi. I would like to request an extension of my temporary NPP rights. Though I haven't been as active as I expected, I still reviewed some articles and participated in the May drive (thanks for the barnstar). I enjoyed the experience and would like to continue helping out whenever I can. Thanks for considering my request. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talkcontribs) 08:14, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Hey man im josh (expires 00:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 08:30, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Evilfreethinker

I'd like to help reduce NPP and AFC backlogs. I've read the terms and rules. Evilfreethinker (talk) 10:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Suntooooth

I'd like to help out with NPP considering the backlog, and now that I've created a few articles I feel like I'm ready. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 18:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)\

User:Anwegmann

I was given a two-moth extension about two months ago, and I wanted to apply now for full-time approval to be a new page reviewer. I have been active in AfDs, and, as suggested in my temporary approval last time, I have reviewed many more pages than the first two months of my reviewership. All of the AfDs I have created have spawned genuine discussion, and I have also approved several new pages that pass the standards of

WP:SIGCOV. I feel as though I have done enough to earn full-time approval, but I would appreciate any approval the admins are willing to give. I enjoy this work, and I enjoy helping clean up Wikipedia. Thank you for your consideration. Anwegmann (talk
) 00:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Hey man im josh (expires 00:00, 2 July 2024 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 00:10, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Dr.AyushBhardwaj

I want to contribute to Wikipedia in good sense and review new pages which provides good information regarding to the topic Dr.AyushBhardwaj (talk) 09:09, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Acrom12

I am confident in my ability to review new articles and drafts, as evidenced by my global contributions and user rights. Some of the articles I have worked on and created include "Biniverse: The First Solo Concert," "Cherry on Top," and "Kyedae," among others. I believe I have the potential to make a valuable contribution as a page reviewer. Acrom12 (talk) 14:37, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

User:SparrowQ

Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights

As an experienced Wiki editor, I am requesting new page reviewer rights to help maintain the quality and accuracy of new pages. Your approval would allow me to contribute more effectively to wiki community. SparrowQ (talk) 18:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 18:40, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Can I resubmit request or wait for approval ? SparrowQ (talk) 20:10, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Page mover


User:PadFoot2008

Hello, I'd like to request page mover rights as I often come across articles that do not follow the

WP:RMs and opened many significant ones, as well as performed many moves myself over the past. Thank you. PadFoot2008
04:07, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

I am slightly concerned about the number of recent reverted moves. Primefac (talk) 14:45, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello @Primefac, concerning those two reverted moves, they were indeed mistakes on my part. In hindsight, I should have done a deeper study of the main article Gahadavala dynasty. I had decided to move some Indian monarch articles to be in par with the standard convention of "(name) of (kingdom)" (such as George II of Great Britain), and when I discovered the two articles (Madanapala (Gahadavala dynasty) and Govindachandra (Gahadavala dynasty)), I proceeded to have a quick look at the main article, where I saw the phrase "Gahadavalas of Kannauj", and after performing a quick search through the usages of "Govindachandra of Kannauj" in RS, I arrived at the conclusion that it would be a good move location. After the move was reverted, I dug deeper and read the main article more carefully and found out that the Gahadavalas do not actually appear to have ruled over the city of Kannauj but rather over Varanasi. I have since been more careful in performing such moves, and the five monarch related article moves performed since seem good for now. PadFoot (talk) 11:43, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

User:SparrowQ

Reason for requesting page mover rights that "I am requesting page mover rights to efficiently handle page renaming jobs. This will help simplify the maintenance process and improve the content." SparrowQ (talk) 20:09, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 1120 total edits. MusikBot talk 20:10, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
 Not done: you do not meet ) 20:59, 1 July 2024 (UTC)


Pending changes reviewer

User:48JCL

I'm a productive user that has warned people in the past for distruptive editing, COI, vandalism and more. I usually try to complete things I start and it is very painful for me to look at Special:PendingChanges having tons of articles. I would definitely try to reduce the backlog. 48JCL 23:45, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

User:HypeBoy

I have been helping in improving Wikipedia for three years now, and I am familiar with the wikipedia policy on

WP:NOT. I'm hoping I can contribute more to Wikipedia by having PCR right. Thank you. — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬✏️
00:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

 Not done, I looked through the history of your talk page to see how you interact with other editors and quickly found this edit (pure vandalism, and dismissed with "Get off my talk page."). Plus, lots of other warnings (and a block) for personal attacks; copyvio, edit warring, and more, and you chose to respond insultingly to most of them. Advanced permissions require the ability to distinguish vandalism (and obviously refrain from it yourself) and to engage in good faith with messages from other editors. DanCherek (talk) 17:22, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Skitash

I have a very strong understanding of Wikipedia guidelines, and I revert disruptive editors and report them to

WP:AIV on a daily basis. I would greatly appreciate access to this permission so that I can review edits to articles. Skitash (talk
) 20:42, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

 Done DanCherek (talk) 17:02, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Harpick

I help with reverting vandalism, and have also read up on Wikipedia's policies on what content would be generally allowed here. -- Harpick (talk) 00:04, 29 June 2024 (UTC) Harpick (talk) 00:04, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 12 days. MusikBot talk 00:10, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
 Not done User has been CU-blocked. DanCherek (talk) 04:38, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

User:TCMemoire

Active in vandalism fighting, already have rollback rights. I would like this tool because I do patrol some high-traffic protected pages, e.g. Mount Rushmore, for WikiProjects I'm involved in. TCMemoire 15:01, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 15:04, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

User:KingSkyLord

I have been editing in this site for over 7 years and I will be using this permission primarily for dealing with positive requests and vandalism in football articles (e.g. Toni Kroos) KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 18:59, 1 July 2024 (UTC)



Rollback


Template editor


Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism


Reports

Bot-reported

User-reported