User:Sbbarker19/sandbox/Trade Unions in Mexico

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Relationship with the State

Unions' political participation depend on the state: especially (especially WHAT) during the regiemes of

Echeverría.[1]

Casa del Obrero Mundial

1912: Casa del Obrero Mundial forms with anarchist influence. The institute started as a place for philosophical discussions, as one of the creators noted, "reformist trade unionism of a Marxist-socialist huie was left aside and attention was centered on...anarcho-syndicalism, without an ounce of bourgeois or proletarian politics." In the mission to be apolitical, the leaders removed workers from the political struggles of the groups fighting for power. (WHO)

1914: Carrancista's won and the Casa established an alliance with them. At first,

Batallones Rojos to defend the Constitutionalist government. The workers, led by opportunists, fought to suppress and extinguish members of their own class: the peasants revolting with Villa and Zapata.[1]
According to Mexican historian Jean Meyer, this collaborations was "a fatal step which would place the Mexican labor movement under the tutelage of the government, a tutelage which has persisted until today." Some groups refused to join teams with the Constitutionalist government. (WHO; WHAT HAPPENED)

Between 1915 and 1916, there were strikes by a variety of trades: elementary school teachers, trolley car operators, electricians, all miners in Mexico state, some led by Casa. The government intervene until workers demanded to be paid in metallic coin rather than paper during the monetary crisis of 1916. Then, Carraza repressed unions and leaders who supported this, eventually leading to the demise of the Casa.

In 1917, while many labor leaders were imprisoned, the draft of the new Constitution included some labor demands in Articles 27 and 123. Carranza didn't agree with these articles, but accepted them to avoid the resurgence of organized opposition. He did not make any concessions which hurt the interests her represented.

Confederación Regional Obrera Mexicana

In 1916, the Federacion de Sindicatos Obreros del Distrito Federal (FSODF) (WHO) called a labor congress to create a central federal union to include the various isolated labor groups. As a result, the CROM was created and Louis N. Morones was elected the leader.

In hopes of controlling organized labor, Carranza issued a manifesto-invitation to labor congress in Saltillo, Coahuila on May 1st, 1916 announced through the governor of Coahuila, Gustavo Espinoza Mireles. Some organized refused to attend in objection to a politician trying to control the labor movement. After the discussions, delegates from 18 states formed CROM. CROM's policy makers were a group of young leaders, heade by Morones, called the Grupo Acción. In 1919, they created the Labor Party in support of Alvaro Obregon;'s candidacy. After Carranza was murder and Adolfo de la Huerta became provisional president, CROM and the Labor Party accepted large sums of money from Obregon and Calles in return for their support.

Regime of Obregon

When Obregon was elected, CROM leaders had official support and posts in the government.

Districo Federal
and Morones became the Director of Factory Supplies and Military Provisions.

Once Obregon's regime assassinated the Governor of Yucatán in 1924, Felipe Carrillo Puerto, CROM began cooling relations with him. By then, they had secured administrative posts they would keep during succeeding regimes. About three months later, Reinaldo Cervantes, CROM's leader, declared that he and his group would begin focusing on consolidating labor and capital.

Regime of Calles

Plutarco Elias Calles, a then-candidate for president, declared that his policy would be controlling trade unions through the CROM to insure a social base for the development of production. Once sworn as president, he appointed Morones as Minister of Industry, Commerce, and Labor. 12 deputies and 3 senators belonging to CROM won seats in the same election. Morones favored unions that belonged to CROM and persecuted those that did not. Between 1920 and 1924, in it's greatest growth period, CROM's membership grew from 100,000 to one million.

In August 1925, the secretary of the FSODF, a member of CROM, declared that a truce must be made between labor and capital so that the regime could develop a policy of attracting investments from foreign nations and that organized labor must surther the policies of Plutarco Elias Calles.

At the end of his term, Morones was made to resign his ministerial post.

Regime of Portes Gil

In 1928, Obregon was elected again. He was assassinated in July, and due to the animosity between Morones and him, Morones was accused of the murder, though no evidence ever proved this. CROM was weakened during by both President Obregon and interim President Emilio Portes Gil's term; many unions broke off from thee CROM as they sensed Morones' loss of power

In November 1928, the CROM organized a Convención Obrero-Patronal (English: Worker-Employee Convention) which came out in support for a

labor code
.

Confederación General de Trabajadores

In 1921, during Obregon's term, the General Confederation of Workers (CGT) was founded and headed by a group of anarcho-sydicalists: Rosendo Salazar, Rafael Quintero, and José G. Escobar. It supported the strikes of the railroad and trolley care operators and confronted CROM.

When, in 1923, Obregon smashed a series of CGT-backed strikes, the CGT began openly opposing the government. Authorities opened the jails and brought convicts to the trolley operator's strike to act as scabs. Vioelnce broke out and several workers died. The CGT won the support of Adolfo de la Huerta, but for reasons other than labor rights. (WHAT)

World Crisis of 1929

The

Partido Nacional Revolucionario
(PNR) (English: Institutional Revolutionary Party). The creation of the PRI sped up the disapperance of the Labor Party, which was an accesory of the CROM.

Governmental organization involvement

Federal Labor Law

On August 28, 1931, President Rubio created the Ley Federal del Trabajo (English: Federal Labor Law) to regulate Article 123 of the Constitution. The law required that companies sign contracts with their workers, though this was objected by many employers' organizations who claimed this would cause unemployment. However, the contracts resulted in stability in working conditions and relations.

The law soon became used as a method for the government to control unions, as it made all strikes and demands subject to government officials. As soon as it was ratified, trolley car workers in the Federal District demanded extra wages from their employer, as they had been made to work extra hours with no added pay since a contract they signed in 1925. Though the union was within their rights and entitled to the pay according to Article 123 and the new labor law, the Ministry of Industry, Commerce and Labor ruled that the company did not have to pay. They argued that the unions should sacrifice their rightful wages due to the difficult economic situation the country was in. This idealism lasted until 1940 when the decision was ruled unjust.

Federal District Chamber of Labor

In June 1932, the government created the Cámara del Trabajo de Distrito Federal (CBDF) (English:

Communist Party
and had failed the merge with the CGT several times.)

More modern times

Trade Unions still have close ties with the government. Labor boards are often made up of union leaders, company leaders, and government officials. It is hard for workers to strike and otherwise move towards better working conditions. It is speculated that this is a goal of the bureaucratization of trade unions, as it demobilizes workers. This has happened in both the

Confederación de Trabajadores de Mexico (CTM) (English: The Confederation of Mexican Workers) especially. They have carried out electoral campaigns and have all but controlled all outbursts of union independence.[1]

References

  1. ^ a b c Delarbe, Raul Trejo; Yanez, Anibal (Winter 1976). "The Mexican Labor Movement: 1917-1975". Latin American Perspectives. 3 (1) (Imperialism and the Working Class in Latin America ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.: 133–153 – via JSTOR.