User talk:036386536a

OK will have Marcello page edited by end of today. Thanks 036386536a (talk) 17:17, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Could someone tell me if its a good idea to list the Secret Vatican Archive references (Title/ Name/ Numbers) over a hundred. Keep getting asked for additional reference. The references I have are multiples in size compared to the article itself.036386536a (talk) 17:01, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

NNot exactly sure what Wiki means as reliable sources? Obviously most historical books should qualify if referenced and published by reliable sources. Some of my links are to Italian language and Latin books since this history is from the third century Roman Empire to the the 18th century.. I can read them, I assume whoever is checking the links can also. Because its not in english does not exclude it. Mmost of this history was revealed from the Secret Vatican Archives and I can litterally list the names and numbers of every document sscroll and book but figured it was a bit much. Would you like me to list the exact Vatican references out of Cardinal Samores Book "lo stato landi" 1983 there are almost a hundred. Figured they were of no use unless you want to go ask the Pope to access them. If you are referring to the "Casalandi" site I have removed most of those even though the specific references are 100% accurate. Please advise036386536a (talk) 18:23, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Will be working on today. Most of this is Doria Landi

Considered merging but the Pamphlij are very protective of there history and articles and would gut most of it Especially the Landi family which is a big part of the Doria family. This is more about the Doria connection to the Royal Landi family036386536a (talk) 13:51, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Will be working on cleaning it up tomorrow. If there was a way to do inline citation of Italian Wikideia it would be a lot cleaner. I also have the Doria Landi Coat of Arms coming to this page trying to figure out how to move a copy from the Italian Wikipedia its used in half a dozen articles. Thanks036386536a (talk) 01:30, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will be cleaning up reference and citations this evening thanks036386536a (talk) 17:55, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am not contesting the Landi Family article but the Doria Landi article and they are then same article as on Italian Wikipedia except for all of the "Additional" information citations and reference I added. There is no button on Doria Landi to click036386536a (talk) 17:53, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Three Ancient Royal Families who carry on today036386536a (talk) 00:23, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will finish editing tomorrow036386536a (talk) 00:20, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

READ AGAIN still working on it back off its all history already in Wikipedia in a number of different sources. When did it become appropriate to delete articles while they are being written??036386536a (talk) 23:20, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This EXACT Article is on Italian Wikipedia its been there for years. They obviously have a different perspective since they understand the connection the character's and their significance. Because you are not familiar with the history behind Doria Landi does not make it un notable. Just means you don't know the players I am working on the references why you are so intent on removing this escapes me. Let me finish it The history is of significance just because you don't know the Italian family lines means nothing. I will reference them then you can try reading it again. If you don't change your mind explain why the Italian Wikipedia finds the EXACT SAME content significant.036386536a (talk) 23:09, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Let me finish the article I am working on it now Dori Landi is a Royal bloodline that goes back to the Empire of Rome 1st century Landi house of has a two thousand year history 700 hundred years of Princes of the Holy Roman Empire

036386536a (talk) 22:57, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Doria Landi article mirrors the one that's been on the Italian Wiki for years. It is an in depth look at the history of the name over a thousand years and its highly citated I will add additional references 036386536a (talk) 21:59, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If someone is saying otherwise I want to know your source036386536a (talk) 21:14, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I created that in Windows Paint Its mine I can do what I want with it You have no reason to touch it. That is MY Families Coat of Arms Period

This update to the "Landi" surname and other famous Italian Landi's is referenced in Wikipedia, The Vatican Library and history books listed in the article and many others over the past 700 years. Will add English versions of reference shortly.

A tag has been placed on

.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ► LowLevel ^(talk) 03:07, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Landi has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 03:34, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The material you copied in is plainly noted as copyrighted on the source page. Acroterion (talk) 03:34, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ► LowLevel ^(talk) 04:20, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 036386536a, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is
  Wikipedia:Copy-paste
  .
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 04:24, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copied materials are not acceptable anywhere on Wikipedia, including this page. Please stop copy/pasting from copyrighted sources. Acroterion (talk) 14:11, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for Citation feedback. Have citated entire article with 43 external references. What other citation do I need to remove the Citation Notification at the top of the page?? 036386536a (talk) 19:39, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 036386536a! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host) talk) 16:28, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply ]

The Landi family has its place in history. But let's try not to over-aggrandize that place, especially based on a website whose purpose appears to be to cater to the self-aggrandizing whims of modern Landi's hoping to link themselves to that history. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:28, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 21:03, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Landi coin from loStatoLandi 1599.jpg, which you've attributed to http://casalandi.net/. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  OTRS pending
  }} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:05, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Landimintedcoin.jpg, which you've attributed to http://casalandi.net/. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  OTRS pending
  }} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:07, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:CastleofBardiLandi1257.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the

]

Disambiguation link notification for December 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

House of Landi

added links pointing to Bourbon, Cardinal, Roman, Spanish, Cordoba, Lando, Landus, Bardi, Farnese and Vatican

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 036386536a,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged

for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 14:31, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LittleWink (talk) 21:08, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do not edit the PROD notification template, as that messed up usages of it throughout the encyclopedia.

17:42, 11 December 2014 (UTC) There is currently a discussion at ]

Copyright problem: Doria Landi

Hello

]

Possibly unfree File:The First Landi C.O.A .of the Second Millennium.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The First Landi C.O.A .of the Second Millennium.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Psychonaut (talk) 14:17, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 036386536a. Could you please participate in the above-noted discussion to let us know exactly where you got this image from? You say that it's found in books going back hundreds of years. Could you please identify the exact book from which this particular version of the coat of arms was scanned? —Psychonaut (talk) 14:19, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Picture of The State of Landi'' first divided flag.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the

may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Psychonaut (talk) 18:48, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Doria Landi

added links pointing to Charles V, Venetians, Genoese, Volta, Lamba, Oria, Landi, Visconte and Doria

House of Landi

added links pointing to Charles V, Lando, Landus, Dark ages and Farnese

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Marcello Landi, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://aiistinaepatrizrc.blogspot.com/2010/11/bulging-veins-in-labia-during-pregnancy.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not

]

I was under the impression that Wikipedia content is in the public domain. If this is so there is no problem. I did translate it and edit and add to it from an Italian Wiki article of the same name. If this is a violation please explain. Thanks036386536a (talk) 14:18, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to comply with the possible copywrite issues you mentioned but dont know which material exactly what you are referring to. Please specify. Thanks036386536a (talk) 14:24, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The problem was explained to you upthread at #Copyright problem: Doria Landi. Text on Wikipedia is not in the public domain, and you cannot copy or translate it without due attribution. Please add an appropriately filled {{translated page}} template to the talk page of the article. Better yet, please stop pasting machine-translated text into Wikipedia altogether. It is not wanted here. —Psychonaut (talk) 14:48, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

The material referred to came from a WIKIPEDIA article on the Italian site. I assumed the italian site would not have such material036386536a (talk) 23:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC) cant fix with no access036386536a (talk) 23:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why would you have assumed this, when two different users have already told you three times on this page that it is not so? On 17 November, User:Acroterion informed you, "Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution." On 12 December, I wrote to you, "When the original text is under copyright, as with almost all text available on Wikipedia, you must make sure you abide by the licence conditions specified by the copyright holder. In the case of text from Wikipedia, these conditions require you to credit the original authors of the text." And yesterday I wrote again to you, "Text on Wikipedia is not in the public domain, and you cannot copy or translate it without due attribution." In each case we pointed you to instructions on how you can provide the legally required attribution. However, you continued to post machine translations of text without attribution. Psychonaut (talk) 23:56, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nyttend (talk) 22:53, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

At the bottom of every page it states that "Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License", which means that it's not in the public domain. We have many policies on copyright which you could have read. You were warned, and

ⓣⓒ 23:45, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

It's possible we are having communication problems due to this editor's habit of sticking his responses on this page on the very top of the page, so it's impossible to tell what he's responding to. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 00:26, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am completely confused. Have a block for avoiding detection??? I log in sometimes, others I do not its always me. If I wanted to avoid detection, your talking to a teacher of post graduate computer science. I am trying to resolve this and getting blocked for copyright infringements I cant edit to resolve. As far as explicit permissions to use materials from my family on casalandi.net I cant go through your process and respond if I am blocked from the page I need to get to. Yes there has been a problem with me answering you at the top of the page at times but I always do respond and will at the bottom going forward. Thannks036386536a (talk) 21:52, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Avoiding detection has nothing to do with it. The problem here is that you have introduced copyright-violating text many times after being warned.

ⓣⓒ 13:30, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

If you were more specific about what you refering to I would have changed it. The articles are finished for the most part anyway. Was just going to finish the final detailed clean up, sentences and other constructs. There are others with interest who will clean it up probably next week. Have a hood goliday 036386536a (talk) 23:03, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you confirm whether you noticed, read, and understood the four messages elsewhere on this talk page which explain to you that the specific problem lies with posting translations of Italian Wikipedia articles? If you didn't notice them, well, that's forgivable, though in order to get unblocked you'd need to promise to familiarize yourself with how talk pages work here so that this sort of oversight doesn't happen again. You'd also need to demonstrate that you have now read and understood the messages.

Regarding the fresh account which has now cleaned up your article as you predicted, you should know that creating another account to evade your block, or asking another person to create an account and edit on your behalf, is not permitted. This is known as "sockpuppetry" or "meatpuppetry", and is covered in our policy Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry. If the other account is judged to be operated by you or at your behest, then it will also be blocked. Psychonaut (talk) 11:57, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I did not see the information on the Italian Wikipedia Articles above before, and didn't realise that there was a copyright infringement with me assuming the material was all public which now is obvious it was not. I will not use it again. As far as others editing the articles from my family, I have a huge Italian family who are just now finding out about the listing, and like any other family, others want to help. I dont have to tell them anything, they are smart enough to understand the notice about the articles issues and some will fix anything that needs fixing. There is no sense in putting a notice that it needs editing only to block everyones account who contributes. My grandfather's land deeds from Italy, come directly from Prince Frederico de Landi. There are over a thousand direct blood relatives. I am sure as the word gets out about the article there will be more and more visits to the the page in the coming months. Thanks David 036386536a (talk) 00:20, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Was reading about the image I uploaded Landi coat of Arms, first Millennium, that I created in Microsoft Paint that I am sharing with anyone who would want it. It says there is a Watermark?? Its a simple Microsoft Paint creation on my laptop, I added no watermark, wouldn't know how to if I wanted. Rarely use Paint. Do they want the format changed to something else. I have been using JPG format for 15 years and have never had anyone with an issue. Explain please.107.77.76.34 (talk) 22:52, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:First Millennium First COA Landi.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Pbrks (talk) 00:59, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LandiFamilyCrestlastundivided.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Pbrks (talk) 16:24, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]