User talk:173.62.200.237

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Maintenance tags and sourced material

Please do not removed maintenance tags without adding or improving the article. Sourced material should not be removed without discussion. Your edits appear to be vandalism. Pjefts (talk) 00:35, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 10 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

false positive, you can report it to my operator
. Thanks,
talk) 00:25, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Sandbox

Please don't edit in other users' sandboxes, unless of course, if you are that user. Thanks... 172.58.41.167 (talk) 02:54, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Please start using edit summaries. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Edit_summary#Always_provide_an_edit_summary Thanks. Pjefts (talk) 12:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rock balancing. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Vensco (T | C) 00:52, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Fourth wave of feminism. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:21, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page

external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:24, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address
, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Criticism of religion template

Instead of copying the template, just invoke it with {{criticism of religion}} (leave off the nowiki stuff) Then, the content of criticism of religion will be updated within the article. See wp:templates especially Help:A quick guide to templates Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 05:00, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia

I see you've already been warned about this. I reverted similar edits at

List of female United States presidential and vice-presidential candidates. Please read and follow the rules.--S Philbrick(Talk) 20:23, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

I see you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please let me know if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa (talk) 00:49, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And again today, on the article Timeline of antisemitism, where you copied from T. S. Eliot. Please stop wasting our time and do it correctly. Thank you, — Diannaa (talk) 00:24, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello, I'm

huh? 14:44, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:29, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address
, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address
, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Reference errors on 7 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

false positive, you can report it to my operator
. Thanks,
talk) 00:22, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Timeline of feminism

It has been proposed that Timeline of feminism be merged into Timeline of second-wave feminism. Seeking your feedback at Talk:Timeline of feminism#Merge discussion. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 12:02, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]