User talk:1RightSider
| This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:1RightSider. |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
Your Bautzen changes
Your changes let the foreign names appear much further down, thus making them appear unimportant in contrast to including them in the lede. Additionally, the whole name section doesn't give any additional information. It is a non-section cause it just lists the names. Tibesti1 (talk) 23:24, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- I don't see that your changes are of any good intention. Deleting the foreign names from the lede just because you think they are not important enough. Tibesti1 (talk) 23:32, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Furthermore it annoys me cause i wrote the whole lede practically on my own. Another thing is your logic with the two names. You keep deleting the "Upper Sorbian: Budyšin" and instead replace it with : Bautzen or Budyšin (Upper Sorbian pronunciation). However: note that the English name is Bautzen only, and not Bautzen or Budyšin, and although both the German and Upper Sorbian names are official, it has to be made clear that Budyšin is the Upper Sorbian version, and therefore it has to read: Bautzen (Upper Sorbian: Budyšin). Note that Bautzen is the English version of the name. You did the same at Cottbus, also a lede that i wrote practically on my own. It doesn't shine a good light on you, just running around here "improving" someone else's work instead of writing something essential on your own. Tibesti1 (talk) 23:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Such rude, aggressive and ignorant messages are not how people address each other on Wikipedia. You've made several major errors here, and you seem to misunderstand some simple tenets of the collaborative encyclopedia. You tried to start a similar fight on Intforce's User Talk page.
If you speak that way to an admin, they'll give you a warning, at least. You should familiarize yourself with Wikipedia. I've put some info on your Talk page. - 1RightSider (talk) 05:12, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- There is always the danger that answers like that are just diversions from the actual points of contention. Just out of interest, which words of my above messages exactly are "rude" or "aggressive"? And yes i remember this memorable other discussion concerning Hamburg, when a user stopped me from mentioning Felix Mendelssohn in the lede. I still think that he is Hamburg's most famous son, and find it quite strange that he may not be mentioned in the lede. Also, i still think that my photo collage was a bit nicer than the current one, but decide that for yourself. What you also didn't mention is that i didn't revert your edits, although i obviously think they are not good. Because i kept waiting for your reply. But there did not come any reply, but just a reprimand. Now that you've made all that (un)clear, you might want to reply to my first point. You inserted: Bautzen or Budyšin. But Budyšin is not the name used most often to refer to Bautzen in English. And as far as i know, the articles are named after the name a city is most often referred to in English, so the two names Bautzen and Budyšin can not be equalized. They are not equal alternatives, but Budyšin is the Upper Sorbian name. Hence ithas to read: Upper Sorbian: Budyšin. And because Budyšin is also official, it also has to be written in bold. Tibesti1 (talk) 00:01, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
March 2024
- Hi @Top of the Pops Saturday to the article Top of the Pops Reloaded, as it should be, and it is made very clear in the first sentence of the article that it redirects to, but you've reverted that too. How did you not notice the subsequent edit? - 1RightSider (talk) 04:34, 31 March 2024 (UTC)]