User talk:203.192.214.45

Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Kirar— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 13:53, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Sadh Vaishnavism, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 04:21, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If tlthe page title seems incorrect,

request a move instead. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 04:22, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Regarding Sādh Vaiṣṇavism. It is wrong based on the sources quoted as well as according to Sanskrit. The meaning is sat/sad = "true/eternal" vaiṣṇavism. It is written as "sadh" in Roman only so that it does not appear as "Unhappy (sad in english) Vaiṣṇavism". But at least when we are writing in IAST (which is supposed to represent Sanskrit accurately) we cannot write it as sādh since there is no word sādh in Sanskrit. Sādhu (saint) is there but not sādh. Hope you agree 203.192.214.45 (talk) 04:28, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did with this edit to Sadh Vaishnavism. Thank you. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 04:39, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But all the sources that have been quoted use the spelling 'sat/sad'. You could check the sources. And there is nothing controversial about it. If there is an expert in Sanskrit they could have a look at the page too. We are not changing the title of the article nor the usage of sadh throughout the article. We are simply correcting how it should be spelt in Sanskrit language. Please read the references once. The books are available on Google 203.192.214.45 (talk) 04:44, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You actually should be correcting the title of the article (by requesting a pagemove) if you think that it is being referred to by the incorrect name. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 04:58, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]