User talk:205.232.106.254

Richard Holder, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

• Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia, and please consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!  Chzz  ►  10:52, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of

]

October 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Civics, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

• Please use
  block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism
  .
• ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning:
  talk) 22:35, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Hello, I'm Apparition11. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Bhutto because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Apparition^{11 Complaints}/Mistakes 23:52, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello. Please see this and this. --Omnipaedista (talk) 01:15, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Mutt Lunker (talk) 22:31, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kingdom of Scotland. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Mutt Lunker (talk) 23:25, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Kingdom of Scotland. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article
  dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards
  .
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's
  Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
  .

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Mutt Lunker (talk) 23:32, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You very clearly and persistently are warring and have not made a single attempt to engage in the discussion on the article talk page, despite at least four editors having reverted your repeated edits over the course of the last few weeks, three of whom have also engaged on the talk page. Self-revert, make your case on the talk page or otherwise you are likely to get yourself in trouble. Mutt Lunker (talk) 23:46, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kingdom of Scotland. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. a slow edit war is still an edit war. Formal warning, if you insert it again without agreement then it's a formal report ----Snowded ^TALK 04:49, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please see User_talk:Toolen#Usage_of_IP.3F. --Omnipaedista (talk) 21:28, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop inserting patent nonsense as you did here. Also please stop violating

Colleague, please take notice of this recent discussion posting on Talk:Islamic State of Iraq. --Corriebertus (talk) 15:00, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Excirial. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Apathetic EP— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 22:05, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Francisco de Aguilar (conquistador)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 17:32, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kenner, Louisiana. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:26, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Pass Christian, Mississippi. Storchy (talk) 08:59, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm

Hello, I'm Lol1VNIO. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Taoiseach, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~~ lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me) 15:56, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm NoNAja. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Sébastien Michaëlis—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. NoNAja (talk) 15:24, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]