User talk:66.65.97.10

Hello, I'm Trivialist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Trivialist (talk) 15:33, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add Dora the Explorer episodes to the articles about years in American television. They aren't unique or notable enough to be singled out on such lists. Thanks. Trivialist (talk) 03:27, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and

• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

• Create new pages and rename pages
• Edit semi-protected pages
• Upload images
• Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (66.65.97.10) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a

Happy editing! –Gladamas (talk · contribs) 01:46, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Thepenguin9. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Daylight saving time in the United States—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Thepenguin9 (talk) 23:14, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

To 66.65.97.10 URGENT DISCUSSION

Can we talk about the reversion of the changes that you made to the Dora Explorer DVD Releases section. The changes just seem to be undoing the changes I made, with no comments as to the justification for the reversion. I assume this is just some sort of glitch, i.e. that you are in the middle of editing the page like me and accidentally deleting what work I have done, unless you indicate differently. Let's discuss this and see if we cannot work together to make the made this a collaborative effort which accurately reflects the subject being critiqued.

From SMargan (talk) 13:44, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by SMargan (talk • contribs) 13:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Editor SMargan has opened a discussion that involves a reversion that you made. It would be appreciated if you'd please participate. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Trivialist. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Trivialist (talk) 20:16, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:17, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:23, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.
RE:List of Dora the Explorer home media releases Changes

Hello 66.65.97.10 (cc: Arbiters, in particular ToBeFree & Cyphoidbomb),

I am notify you that you have been reported by me to the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring Wiki Page, for the recent set of changes you made to List of Dora the Explorer home media releases. I have tried to discuss these changes with you previously, which seem just to be undoing changes I have made. I am hoping that my second attempt to reach out to you via your personal page is more productive. Please talk to me ASAP about the last changes you made to List of Dora the Explorer home media releases.

Previously, the page List of Dora the Explorer home media releases was brought to the attention of the arbiters. It concerned your relentless edits which seemed to undo all the edits I had made. Looking through the 'Edit History' of that page's edits, this continual undoing of other editors' work by you seems to have gone on unabated for a number of years, and has been brought to the attention of arbiters before by other editors. You seem then, as now, not giving any rationalisation for the undo changes, or any inline citations to back up the changes, and still remain, as previously, completely unresponsive.

The editor (ToBeFree) previous barred once for 1 day, but you have continued after this unbated. You were then barred by the arbiter (Cyphoidbomb) for a week, however, the week is up and the undo edits have continued. Some of the changes are dubious formatting changes, but other changes (without a single inline citation to back them up) are to existing information previously back-up with specific inline citations verifying the data provided. It is these changes I have objected to, as the asserted information you have added in these cases is now often directly contradicting the only inline citation provided.

PLEASE! LETS US TALK NOW! There is nothing that cannot be overcome when people sit down as discuss things. Indeed, I am sure that if you open up a dialogue, that we can work together to make the List of Dora the Explorer home media releases page a resource which is worthy of Wikipedia. I do not want to start another "Editor War" with you, as they are not productive.

I will be looking forward to your response and perhaps opening up a discussion on the reversion edits you seem to be making.

SMargan (talk) 09:08, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In these edits, you made a couple of changes that I have questions about.

1. You changed an episode from "A Letter to Swiper" to "A Letter For Swiper", despite the current reference having the episode listed as "A Letter to Swiper". Can you please explain why you changed it?
2. You changed the release date for that episode from January 1, 2003 to September 2, 2003, even though the source indicates January 1, 2003.
3. You changed the release date for "Wish on a Star" from June 26, 2001 to June 5, 2001, even though the source indicates June 26.

Can you please explain why you made these changes, because changes that conflict with existing references tend to look like vandalism, which I don't think was your intention, but I need you to explain, please. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:46, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:26, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:54, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Idell (talk) 13:22, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]