User talk:67.48.200.162

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome!

Hello, and

welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions
so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have

had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits
.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (67.48.200.162) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a

intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date
your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing!  

ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 20:08, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

November 2018

wolf 22:52, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hyman G. Rickover

Thank you for your work on the Hyman G. Rickover article. I would like to collaborate in order to further improve the article. Thank you. Andrew Englehart (talk) 20:36, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, so, I don't know exactly what "reverting a clearly "triggered" editor who is using poor judgement" means, but I can only assume you were referring to me, and it doesn't sound very complimentary. Please be civil on Wikipedia. Thanks. Andrew Englehart (talk) 21:09, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Right-o. Please do the same; your commentary on your edits apply as well. --67.48.200.162 (talk) 21:10, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You've added a really long excerpt from Rickover's own work to his article, but there's no secondary source that supports such an addition. Can you explain why you keep re-adding it, when it doesn't belong in an encyclopedia article? Andrew Englehart (talk) 21:20, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a primary source...it's a secondary one. Rickover didn't publish it. Does that help you to understand better? --67.48.200.162 (talk) 21:33, 27 January 2020 (UTC)--67.48.200.162 (talk) 21:33, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The combination of you writing "reverting a clearly "triggered" editor who is using poor judgement" and now sarcastically asking "Does that help you to understand better?" leads me to believe that you are not interested in a productive dialogue, and only wish to impose your will on the article, rather than collaborating. I think it's probably best for a third party to step in and assess this situation. Andrew Englehart (talk) 21:35, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Andrew Englehart (talk) 22:52, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Hyman G. Rickover. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. edit summary Toddst1 (talk) 01:51, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your warning to Andrew about
WP:WIKIHOUNDing

I think you'd have a very difficult a case on

WP:WIKIHOUNDing you as you assert here. One edit on a second page is hardly stalking. However, your edit warring and personal attack on the Rickover article will ensure that there are quite a few eyes on your edits for a while. Toddst1 (talk) 02:00, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

And in the meantime, apparently Andrew Englehart's personal attacks (comments on edits) and edit warring goes unnoticed? Not to mention his wholesale deletion (~3,000 characters) in an apparent fit of pique? Am I reading your statement correctly? --67.48.200.162 (talk) 16:23, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't seen any personal attacks from Andrew. If I've missed any, please provide diffs.
However characterizing him as editing in a "fit of pique" is again, a personal attack.
Comment on content, not on the contributor. This is your last warning. Continued personal attacks will find you blocked from editing. Toddst1 (talk) 21:45, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

I understand...you. --67.48.200.162 (talk) 14:37, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

See discussion on ANi: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#IP_hopper_and_ad-hominem_attacks_/_ignoring_consensus. Toddst1 (talk) 19:13, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]