User talk:80.3.122.252

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. JeffSpaceman (talk) 21:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Bluebird K7, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 18:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• That YouTube video is a
  wp:reliable source. Adakiko (talk) 19:01, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply
  ]

BTW: If you cite a long video, be sure to state the time where the mention can be found? See {{

cite video}} use the "|time=" field. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 19:04, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bluebird K7. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Joyous! Noise! 17:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I count find the original description but have now done so and edited accordingly by adding the exact text as following

’This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people)’ 80.3.122.252 (talk) 17:49, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The edit you're adding does not belong in the article itself. Please either take the problem to the

ok, thanks for your help 80.3.122.252 (talk) 19:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Andy Dingley. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bluebird K7 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Your repeated change, here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bluebird_K7&diff=prev&oldid=1223773566 is breaking the wikilink to the Donald Campbell page and is also against our style guide for the use of names. Please stop changing this. Andy Dingley (talk) 08:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Bluebird K7, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:09, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• This edit at
  three-revert rule, which you were previously warned about. As a courtesy to you, I have reverted the edit—normally I would ask a user to self-revert and bring themselves back under the brightline rule of three reverts in 24 hours. Please take your concerns to the talk page, because reverting the article again will result in you being blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 19:36, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Bluebird K7, you may be blocked from editing. Wiiformii (talk) 14:42, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Bluebird K7. Why is this reference being removed? Wiiformii (talk) 14:46, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:22, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]