John of England, did not appear to be constructive and has been
automatically reverted by
ClueBot .
Please use block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in
vandalism .
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please
report it here , remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: talk) 12:52, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Hello, I'm Igoldste . I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Jim Morrison — because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox . If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page . Thanks. Ira Goldstein (talk ) 05:06, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[ reply ]
If this is a shared IP address , and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at MC Ride . Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be undone.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's
G 05:22, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
[ reply ]
If this is a shared IP address , and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
G 05:24, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
[ reply ]
If this is a shared IP address , and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
G 19:42, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
[ reply ]
If this is a shared IP address , and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Hi 80.5.88.70. Editors are allowed to remove comments from their user talk pages except in certain specific cases as explained in
edit warring and will not help you resolve this matter. --
Marchjuly (
talk ) 22:07, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
[ reply ]
If this is a shared IP address , and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Good evening, I see you have been involved in discussion over candidate names, I have opened a wider discussion about this here - Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom (section 9). I tried to ping you from that discussion, but I'm not sure if it's possible to ping an ip-user so thought I'd let you know about it here. Frinton100 (talk ) 22:26, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]
.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule , which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Aussie Legend (✉ ) 16:02, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]
If this is a shared IP address , and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
@Psterling92 : . Just edit the article! You can edit the Help Desk so you can edit this (I see you've edited it in the past). 80.5.88.70 (talk ) 06:25, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
@Psterling92 : . I see you are 75.143.100.148. It might be a good idea to make the edit from your registered account, also to create
a user page mentioning your paid position within the school (if you have one). 80.5.88.70 (talk ) 06:34, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[ reply ]
]