User talk:Agamino911

Minor edits

Amhara genocide that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. -- Random person no 362478479 (talk) 10:20, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

August 2023

Amhara genocide several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy

disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article

Talk:Amhara genocide, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 08:48, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Amhara genocide—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 10:35, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to

Amhara genocide, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 10:41, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, I'm Geniac. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Kamini Kaushal, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Geniac (talk) 04:44, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Amhara genocide

Please discuss the issues on the talk page:

talk:Amhara genocide. That article falls under wp:contentious topics

(as mentioned in the orange boxes at the top of talk:Amhara genocide); please read before editing!
Get wp:consensus before making further edits. See help:talk pages and, for an info overload, wp:talk page guidelines. Use help:notifications to notify interested parties. Be sure to include evidence (citations)! Also, see wp:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle for some suggestions. I also recommend wp:neutral point of view. You can also ask for help and advice at the wp:teahouse.

TDF

Hello - I saw your post on my talk page that you removed. I just wanted to add that the "MyViewsonNews" site you mentioned is definitely not a reliable source, do you have other more reliable sources? News articles, journals, etcs

talk) 06:58, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello. My Views on News is a reliable source because the admin has a team of underground reporters on the ground in Ethiopia, who give the information. Furthermore, I have contacted the admin to give further and nore reliable sources to verify the situation. Agamino911 (talk) 09:58, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's not reliable, its a self published source. Read

talk) 05:00, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

@

talk) 00:45, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject

.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Gewargis III

added a link pointing to Habbaniya

Tesfaye Dinka

added a link pointing to Ambo

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undiscussed moves

Iskandar323 (talk) 06:43, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, so can you explain why did you moved pages related to Libyan civil war (2014–2020) to Second Libyan Civil War? Toadette ^(chat)/_(logs) 13:37, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I moved the pages was the fact that Libya had two civil wars, therefore the two civil wars are counted. Agamino911 (talk) 13:53, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI case

An ANI case has been opened involving your recent page moves.

Iskandar323 (talk) 11:22, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Personal attacks

Before claiming I'm "chauvinistic", check my other edits. I also remove "present-day Turkey", etc. Beshogur (talk) 16:24, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your actions were chauvinist. Your seemingly futile attempt to conceal the current statuses of birthplaces of Turkish historical and political figures (i.e, which country they are currently part of), is chauvinist. This is not an attack, but giving the reason of your actions. Agamino911 (talk) 16:33, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Beshogur (talk) 17:55, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing happened, but nice try. Agamino911 (talk) 15:59, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators:

IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Courcelles (talk) 14:42, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply

]