User talk:Alpha200807

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to IPhone (disambiguation) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the
  introduction
  .
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: IPhone (disambiguation) was changed by Alpha200807 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.892828 on 2023-08-14T07:34:29+00:00

Thank you.

And do not ever change a redirect target based on an open move request that you started again. It's especially beyond the pale when there is, so far, unanimous opposition to said move request. --Sable232 (talk) 21:00, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hyundae. --Sable232 (talk) 02:39, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect 1Ph0n3 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 3 § 1Ph0n3 until a consensus is reached. Deauthorized. ^(talk) 19:50, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to have to ask you to stop altering where redirects target. It seems you're redirecting them based on your own feelings of where they should point and most of the time it is not the primary usages and are not the appropriate redirects. So please stop.

Additionally you've already been asked not to alter redirects in articles to target articles directly as per

Okay, I mentioned this but you've ignored it. Please stop altering redirects to go to other none primary articles instead of reasonable disambiguation pages. Additionally you've been warned multiple times to not change links in articles that are redirects to be direct links, per

WP:NOTBROKEN there are many reasons for doing this and it's not broken. If you continue with these edits against the warnings, you will be blocked from editing. Canterbury Tail talk 11:52, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, Alpha200807

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username TartarTorte and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Ad1das, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 6 § Ad1das.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TartarTorte}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TartarTorte 20:47, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Alpha200807,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged T0y0ta for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want T0y0ta to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged N1ssan for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want N1ssan to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

With edits like this one I'm starting to question your

The redirect 5am5ung has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 10 § 5am5ung until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:49, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alpha200807

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MicrobiologyMarcus and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect R3sona, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 10 § R3sona.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MicrobiologyMarcus}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

MicrobiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish•cultures)} 20:26, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect P@n@50n1c has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 11 § P@n@50n1c until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:17, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect M@zd@ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 11 § M@zd@ until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:17, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect 1nt3l has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 11 § 1nt3l until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:17, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Y@h00 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 11 § Y@h00 until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:17, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Y@h00! has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 11 § Y@h00! until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:17, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect NV101@ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 11 § NV101@ until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:18, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect N1nt3nd0 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 11 § N1nt3nd0 until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:19, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect M1cr0s0ft has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 11 § M1cr0s0ft until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:19, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Nv1dia has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 11 § Nv1dia until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:19, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect D3ll has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 11 § D3ll until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:19, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect 1ntel has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 11 § 1ntel until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:20, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect P1k@chu has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 11 § P1k@chu until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:29, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Hyund@1 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 11 § Hyund@1 until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:30, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect P3nt1um has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 11 § P3nt1um until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:30, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop creating ridiculous redirects. You're causing a lot of disruption with unreasonable redirects, altering redirects and other disruptive edits. If you continue your current path you will be blocked for disruption. Canterbury Tail talk 20:11, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Galaxy X a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is

You changed these redirect links from T-Mobile to T-Mobile US to fix a double redirect?

I'm not sure why this is, but I suspect it was a mistake during your attempted move of the

I still don't get why they would redirect to the US-specific version of the brand, but I thought I should bring this to your attention anyway.

(Edit; looking at the other comments on your page, it appears that you have created a large number of problematic redirects and pointless edits. Please stop this or you are likely to be banned.)

All the best,

Ubcule (talk) 11:34, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

(See here for the specific discussion).

Ubcule (talk) 12:08, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 13:04, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alpha200807 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Accidentally blocked Alpha200807 (talk) 13:06, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:10, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alpha200807 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I want to unblock, because i warned for disruptive editing, i do not want to do disruptive edits that harms Wikipedia Alpha200807 (talk) 13:55, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't see any evidence that you know why you are blocked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:21, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alpha200807 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I do redirects and need to stick around with maintaining Wikipedia pages, I apologize for disruptive editing, my English is not good, Thanks Alpha200807 (talk) 04:46, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If your English is not good, to the point where you are unable to tell us why you were blocked, you should edit the version of Wikipedia that is in your primary language. There is nothing special about the English Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 09:03, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not permitted to modify or remove declined unblock requests for your currently active block. Do not do so again. --Yamla (talk) 13:15, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I edit conflicted on the unblock, with which I agree. Reasoning here if it helps with future requests: Continued the disruptive editing after many prior warnings. I see no reason in this unblock to believe they'll stop if free to edit again. Additional concern that they lack the English language skills to contribute here, which may lead to some of the previously raised issues Star Mississippi 14:23, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

After 3 block requests was declined, please set block expiration time to 14 November 2023 , i don't want to continue disruptive editing, Thanks. Alpha200807 (talk) 09:21, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You still show no sign of understanding how disruptive you have been. There is no indication that you will understand by 14 November 2023. The conditions for lifting your block are that you understand, and that you undertake not to continue the behaviour, not that a certain period of time has passed. [Back to the task of housekeeping your hundreds of redirects] Cabayi (talk) 10:09, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

is closed.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 05:39, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alpha200807 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

please unblock me, it's 7 days, i wanna edit Wikipedia again

Decline reason:

No reason to keep this open after talk page access revocation, per below. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:37, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Alpha200807 (talk) 03:03, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• TPA revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 03:56, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What part of the following don't you understand?

• You will not be unblocked unless you show that you understand the reasons for the block.
• Saying "i wanna edit Wikipedia again" does not give any indication at all that you understand the reasons for the block.
• You will not be unblocked unless you make it clear that you won't repeat the problems which led to the block.
• Saying "i wanna edit Wikipedia again" does not give any indication at all that you won't repeat the problems which led to the block. JBW (talk) 10:45, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]