User talk:Amgray19

I'm not disputing that the information regarding the specific composition of "

I am not trying to be a pain either; you did not indicate that you had purchased the sheet music in the edit summary (you only said that it was wrong), so I assumed that you were going by the free preview only; and you know what they say, assume makes an 'ass of u and me'! :-) Thanks for clearing it up regardless, and happy editing. Melicans (talk, contributions) 20:53, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Amgray19, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:08, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Research Administrators Certification Council (RACC), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

Thank you for your attention.

Hello, Amgray19. It has been over six months since you last edited your

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:40, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Garchy was:

This submission appears to

independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability

of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Things like "The CFRA designation is currently under consideration for trademark" and having the registered trademark symbol in your article make it sound

promotional

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Research Administrators Certification Council (RACC) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Garchy (talk) 23:32, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Amgray19, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Garchy (talk) 23:32, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in

notable

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Two reasons: first, inadequate proof of notability--listings in directories are not substantial references.Second, it still reads promotionally, with detail that no one outside the group would be concerned with.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Research Administrators Certification Council (RACC) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 08:31, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Research Administrators Certification Council (RACC), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

Thank you for your attention.

Hello, Amgray19. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:16, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Research Administrators Certification Council (RACC), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

Thank you for your attention.

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Research Administrators Certification Council (RACC), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

Thank you for your attention.

Hello, Amgray19. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Hello, Amgray19. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 10:10, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Amgray19 I have added projects Science, Education, to your article. You may wish to join them, check their to-do, and meet new people with interest in these topics. Cheers, --Gryllida (talk) 01:11, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by K.e.coffman was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

K.e.coffman (talk) 01:48, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is very frustrating. I have worked very hard to address all past advice given to me to cite available literature on this topic. I have referenced every possible literature source that is available. It's rather interesting that there is an allowed page for one of the exams referenced in the draft of this page (the CRA exam), but the actual body that created the exam is not allowed to be included as an article. I would love some feedback to help, if possible. Amgray19 (talk) 18:36, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is anyone going to address this? This makes three times asking for reconsideration. There are way more ridiculous items allowed on Wikipedia, and an organization that is important to tens of thousands of research administrators should be considered "notable." Amgray19 (talk) 18:14, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Amgray19. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (Talk) 08:15, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Research Administrators Certification Council, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

Thank you for your attention.

Hello, Amgray19. It has been over six months since you last edited the