User talk:Aoba47/Archive 12

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Hey!

Would you like to take a look at my FLC? Thanks!Krish | Talk 19:35, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I will post some comments in a few.
    Aoba47 (talk) 20:52, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Kaththi/archive1

I would appreciate your comments as always, Aoba.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 08:44, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I will look at it in a couple minutes.
    Aoba47 (talk) 15:59, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Melanie Barnett

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Melanie Barnett has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:19, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for the help! I think that this may be the next article I nominate for FAC so hopefully it goes well. Have a great rest of your day!
    Aoba47 (talk) 21:21, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Lenalee Lee

I've just nominated Lenalee Lee to GA and I wanted to know if you or User:ISD could review them based on your experiences with articles I edit. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 21:53, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • @
    Aoba47 (talk) 22:49, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]

DYK for Chains of Love (TV series)

On 17 October 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chains of Love (TV series), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Chains of Love was described as "televised prostitution"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chains of Love (TV series). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Chains of Love (TV series)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex ShihTalk 00:33, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/M. G. Ramachandran filmography/archive1

I would appreciate your comments as always, Aoba.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 13:04, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I will provide some comments later today if that is okay with you.
    Aoba47 (talk) 15:51, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Sure.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 16:18, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Melanie

Holy shit! Somebody actually found a public domain image of Tia Mowry. Not saying you should add unless you want to, but if you do I'll add it on the image review. PanagiotisZois (talk) 19:14, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for the heads-up. That is really cool! I think that the article is fine without it as the infobox image also shows her so I think two images of Mowry would be a little overkill.
    Aoba47 (talk) 19:39, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Your GA nomination of All Souls (TV series)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bcschneider53 -- Bcschneider53 (talk) 03:01, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Your GA nomination of All Souls (TV series)

The article

good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:All Souls (TV series) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bcschneider53 -- Bcschneider53 (talk) 03:21, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Pru (album) scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the

today's featured article for November 3, 2017. I know you requested it on the 7th, but the nomination received no other supports for that day, and there was a good date connection for running something on the Russian Revolution on that date - rather than not schedule Pru at all, I chose to run it a few days before the anniversary you requested. If you'd rather hold this for the 20th anniversary of the release in 2020, please let me know and I'll schedule something else on the 3rd. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 3, 2017. Thanks! Ealdgyth - Talk 13:37, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Thank you for the "the eponymous, debut studio album by American singer Pru"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:59, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

Would you like to take a look at my FLC? Thanks. Krish | Talk 16:19, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I will add some comments to your FLC sometime today.
    Aoba47 (talk) 15:19, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Your GA nomination of All Souls (TV series)

The article All Souls (TV series) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:All Souls (TV series) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bcschneider53 -- Bcschneider53 (talk) 16:21, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 October 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:36, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yonce

Aoba, can you comment on the FLC of

Beyonce videography? It has been there for over a month now and has not received much of a feedback. Would appreciate your help. – FrB.TG (talk) 07:14, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Apology

Aoba, I'm very sorry that I didn't respond to your post. I did see it, then I decided to respond later and of course forgot. It's unlikely that I'll have time to look at the FAC, because I have several other things stacking up that I've been intending to do. But I wish you all the best with it, and once again I apologize for not responding earlier. SarahSV (talk) 18:40, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • No worries and I completely understand. Fortunately, the FAC has already received a lot of attention and is currently receiving a rather in-depth prose review so it is already close to being closed anyway. Thank you for your message, and good luck with your current projects!
    Aoba47 (talk) 18:44, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]

DYK for Kia Steave-Dickerson

On 1 November 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kia Steave-Dickerson, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Kia Steave-Dickerson, the design artist for four films by M. Night Shyamalan, originally considered a career in dry cleaning? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kia Steave-Dickerson. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Kia Steave-Dickerson), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Knuckles' Chaotix

Hi, would you mind leaving some comments at my current FAC? It's been open for almost a week now and there have been no comments besides an image review. JOEBRO64 20:25, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I will put some comments up by the end of today. Good luck with the FAC! I have a lot of respect for your work.
    Aoba47 (talk) 21:36, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Orphaned non-free image File:FlounderPinball.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All Souls (TV Series)

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article All Souls (TV series) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:52, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you as always!
    Aoba47 (talk) 20:59, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Orphaned non-free image File:SévérineInfobox.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chad Harris-Crane

This is to let you know that the

today's featured article for December 19, 2017. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/December 19, 2017.--Wehwalt (talk) 19:19, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

I am scheduling one month in three. Generally, TFA/R requests are granted. Then, I've been trying to fill in with a range of articles. Yours was a TV article about a fictional character and so it seemed different from other articles. All articles that haven't run are under consideration, although I respect the wishes of those who have asked that their articles not be run. So the process was I saw it, went over it with checklinks and looking for uncited passages, checked to ensure there no talk page disputes going on, put it on my list and it survived the rearrangements and cuts.--Wehwalt (talk) 20:24, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you for your response. I am more than happy to have my article on the front page, but I was just curious about the process. Hope you have a wonderful day.
    Aoba47 (talk) 20:26, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Thank you! I worked really hard on it, so I appreciate your comment.
    Aoba47 (talk) 20:43, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Chains of Love (TV series)

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Chains of Love (TV series) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the GA review.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:09, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you as always.
    Aoba47 (talk) 21:37, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Inna

Hi there! Could you maybe take my GAN Inna on review too? You recently reviewed "Rendez Vous" and Inna would be the last article to be brought to GA status from the surrounding topic. Of course I will do something for you, too. Cartoon network freak (talk) 10:09, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I will grab this for a review, and don't feel pressure to review any of my GANs. Hope you are having a wonderful day so far.
    Aoba47 (talk) 17:03, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Your GA nomination of Days in the Sun

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 21:42, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Your GA nomination of My Man (Tamar Braxton song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 21:42, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Neutrality and original research

Please don't label stuff as a "breakthrough", as you did in this edit. This is your own personal analysis, and is forbidden by Wikipedia's policy against

original research. If you want to write about when you think someone's breakthrough was, try the IMDb or a blog, where you gush about their career to your heart's content. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:20, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Yeah, you're right. That did too far. I apologize. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:44, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @
    Aoba47 (talk) 17:49, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Your GA nomination of My Man (Tamar Braxton song)

The article

good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:My Man (Tamar Braxton song) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 21:41, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Your GA nomination of My Man (Tamar Braxton song)

The article My Man (Tamar Braxton song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:My Man (Tamar Braxton song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 21:02, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Days in the Sun

The article

good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Days in the Sun for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 21:41, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

A barnstar for you!

The Double GA Award
For bringing two articles ("My Man" and "Days in the Sun") to GA status on the same date! It's usually very hard to achieve such a feat  — Cartoon network freak (talk) 12:20, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Days in the Sun

The article Days in the Sun you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Days in the Sun for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 22:41, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FL

Would you like to take a look at my FLC? I would appreciate it. Thanks.Krish | Talk 00:25, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • @
    Aoba47 (talk) 00:28, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Sure thing! I will do it tomorrow. Just to let you know it's 6:00 AM here and I will be going to bed now. I guess I partied way too hard last night and forgot to sleep. Well this has become a routine on a Saturday night. I just hope I don't oversleep and wake up tomorrow morning. Haha.Krish | Talk 00:36, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you! And I hope you had a great Saturday night and a good Sunday lol.
    Aoba47 (talk) 01:10, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Thank you

Hi Aoba47. I've just returned from vacation. Just wanted to say thanks for joining in on the Jill Valentine peer review, and also I understand the frustration you expressed over it. Trying to reason with SlimVirgin is by far the most stressful thing I have tried to do in over 9 years of editing Wikipedia. She's absolutely impossible to work with, so I completely understand and respect your choice to step back from the peer review. I hope to work with you on a project in the future that hopefully doesn't involve any toxic editors. :)

talk) 06:18, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Moneyball (film)/archive1

I would appreciate your comments as always, Aoba. This is my first attempt at a Hollywood film accolades list BTW.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 16:06, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I will take a look through it later today if that is alright with you. Your work and your work ethic is always very inspiring.
    Aoba47 (talk) 16:10, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Thank you very much for that, Aoba. Means a lot coming from you.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 16:14, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Anytime!
    Aoba47 (talk) 16:16, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Sarada Uchiha

Following its copyedit, I nominated Sarada Uchiha to GA. It's not a big article so I would if you could review it you have free time. Cheers and good luck with your other nominations.Tintor2 (talk) 22:27, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I can definitely pick it up for review, especially after everything you did to help me.
    Aoba47 (talk) 22:40, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]

The Signpost: 24 November 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sévérine

Hey, I'm sorry to see you're withdrawing the FAC. Please don't feel disheartened—I thought the article was in excellent shape and the fact that you've promoted 14 FAs is a remarkable feat! That's double what I have. Do you still want me to give it a source review? I was holding off as I wasn't sure it required one given the amount of comments above. I really don't understand what the criticism is all about here, if anything the prose is of an excellent standard. JAGUAR  20:12, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • @
    Aoba47 (talk) 20:40, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Like Jaguar, I saw this edit and also wanted to extend my sympathies and best wishes. The FAC process is frustrating sometimes, but I hope taking some time off will help you recharge and return with a clear state of mind. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 21:20, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you! That is very sweet of you. I just think a break is in order for me for the time being. Good luck with all of your projects on and off Wikipedia and hopefully we will be able to collaborate on something in the future!
    Aoba47 (talk) 22:07, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Thank you! That means a lot. I just need to relax a little and spend some time away from here. Hope you are doing well.
    Aoba47 (talk) 02:54, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Days in the Sun

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by The Tree of Life (film)/archive1

I would appreciate your comments here too, Aoba. Do let me know if you are interested in reviewing this by pinging me. Thank you.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 07:13, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • @
    Aoba47 (talk) 16:22, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]
No problem. Really sad to hear about the outcome of your FAC BTW. Don't get bogged down by it. Keep up your good work and have a good wikibreak, no one deserves it more.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 16:24, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi Aoba. I'm very sorry to see you withdraw the article and to see you so discouraged. FAC can be discouraging, no doubt about it (and I've definitely been there). You have more FAs to your name than I do, and maybe lots of them went relatively smoothly for you without a lot of "negative" feedback. Can I tell you that both of my solo FAs so far had some big bumps and opposes, and sure I got discouraged and thought about quitting. But I find the best way forward is to just buckle up and keep trying. Realize that everyone's preferences are a little bit different, and that reaching FAC can be thought of as just sticking it out and keeping working with other reviewers towards tweaking things to reach that consensus. There's no "right" and "wrong" perfect wording, and as you said it's not personal, and if your approach to the article isn't exactly the same as a reviewer's, so what? It's all about reaching consensus. It's the FA community that settles on the final wording that gets promoted, and if you have to make some concessions away from how you originally envisioned the article, there's no shame in that, and you can still be mighty proud of all the hard work you put into the article. That's how I've tried to approach it, even when I've gotten discouraged. For Sévérine, after you had adjusted the Characterization section, I saw a few more sentences I was possibly going to comment on, but felt I was getting quite close to supporting. Anyways, I hope you'll be back soon! Moisejp (talk) 07:14, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for your kind words. I greatly appreciate your help with this FAC and my previous one as your reviews always help to improve the article. I do plan on putting this article back through the FAC process sometime in the future, but I honestly just need to take a break from Wikipedia for a little bit as I was just getting too stressed out (which I know sounds a little silly). Your advice is very helpful, and will definitely help me to avoid getting so stressed out about Wikipedia things in the future. I hope you have a wonderful rest of your day!
    Aoba47 (talk) 16:26, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Heya

Hey, Aoba. I don't know you very well, but I had a wonderful experience "working" with you on the Kate Winslet FAC. From what I took away from your review of the article, I found you to be an excellent writer with great taste, and an altogether lovely person to talk and interact with (which from my almost 7 years on this website, I can safely say is both exceptionally and heartbreakingly rare).

I'm a poster child of "Wiki breakdowns", having quit the website no less than 3 times in the past -- mostly due to botched FACs or when faced with gruelling edit wars. I know first hand how worthless your hard work seems in such cases, and how the lack of solidarity from fellow editors renders the situation even worse. So I completely sympathise with you and believe that a break will do you tremendous good.

Call me a cynic, but I've come to believe that there will be people who will never see the best in you, who will try hard to make your contributions to this website seem superfluous, and make you feel entirely replaceable. But take it from me, they are wrong. You are an exceptional asset to Wikipedia, and I say this with utmost certainty despite "knowing" you very little. I see many other editors have lent their support to you in better ways than I ever can (especially by the wonderful Moisejp right above), but do count me among those voices who greatly appreciate you and your work here. I wish to see you back pretty soon, and am hopeful for a collaboration in the future. (Maybe on The Reader -- which I'm sure is something we can spend hours discussing and arguing about).

Take care, and illegitimi non carborundum. Cheers, Krimuk2.0 (talk) 17:10, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you! That is very sweet of you; you helped me feel less silly about my "Wiki breakdown" lol. I enjoyed reviewing your Kate Winslet FAC a lot. It would be great to collaborate with you in the future. I hope that you have a great rest of your day!
    Aoba47 (talk) 18:51, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Why?

I was going to comment on your FAC today but it has been archived. I don't understand. What happened?Krish | Talk 20:17, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for your message. I just felt too stressed to continue the FAC and I have decided to take a hiatus from Wikipedia for a least a month or so to destress and focus on off-Wikipedia projects. Hope you are doing well and have a wonderful rest of your day.
    Aoba47 (talk) 21:38, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Days in the Sun

No worries; good luck with your planned FAC nom. Cheers,
Baffle gab1978 (talk) 04:17, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

A reminder

Just wanted to remind you how wonderful your are. And since, it must be really hard being wonderful all the time, enjoy your break. NumerounovedantTalk 18:08, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

From Wikipedia, not from being wonderful. xD NumerounovedantTalk 18:09, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you! I knew what you meant lol. That is very sweet of you to say. I hope that you have a wonderful rest of your day, and I look forward to working with you further in the future.
    Aoba47 (talk) 18:10, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Veronica Clare

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Veronica Clare has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 19:45, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you!
    Aoba47 (talk) 21:37, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Aoba47/Archive_12&oldid=1141637430"