User talk:Arjayay/Archive 17

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

hey! Am trying to put in the correct figures of Nigerian Christians according Pew research. I am a nigeria citizen and i have and know more about Nigeria morethan you So restrained from editing what i added.. For more info check religion in nigeria — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dankafanchan (talk • contribs) 16:00, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Sources giving the figures you keep adding, then you must cite them, not just change the figures. If you continue entering false figures, as you keep doing, you will end up being blocked. - Arjayay (talk

) 16:16, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello , thanks a lot for editing my misspelled words. Please lead me to be a perfect Wikipedian. Can u help me how to create articles in right way,how to write,how to be a profession writing. Victoria tnds (talk) 18:12, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi

WP:Your first article and if you have any questions please come back and ask them here - sorry for the delay - Arjayay (talk

) 09:36, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I made an edit on the topic of "Barisal" which is my city - so I know all about it. Once you deleted the edit, I reverted it and put wikipedia link on "Barisal guns" which itself has reliable sources and I thought that is enough. Is that not enough evidence and source? This is a scientific phenomenon which even has an entry in Encyclopedia Britannica and many textbooks, and you are deleting mentioning that phenomenon. This sounds kind of absurd. Please tell me how you/I can revert it back - this information must be in that entry somewhere. Please follow the link on "Barisal guns" on Wiki to find out more. Thanks and please let me know.

Hi DhanshiriM - thanks for your post, which I found near the top of the page. Please put new posts at the bottom of talk pages, and please sign all posts on talk pages with 4 tildes ( ~~~~ ) which will add your signature and a timestamp.
As for the point you raised, I must apologise; your first post at Barisal included no references or links, so I deleted it as unsourced, I thought your second post was exactly the same, but I missed that you changed the quotes i.e. "Barisal Guns" to wikilinks i.e. [[Barisal Guns]]. I have just reinstated your addition, and removed Barisal guns from the "See also" section, as we don't duplicate links used in the article. - apologies again - Arjayay (talk) 09:53, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

About editing Contents About 'JALPAIGURI'.How much do you know about the district and it's people.It has majority of 'Rajbanshi' people who are some how neglected because of political and social reasons.These 'Rajbanshi' community is backward and cheated at multiple occasions.I didn't see a page about 'Rajabnshi' but I saw a page about their language.I don't know what did you mean by reliable.These are the people who never bother themselves about wikipedia.But I do care.How can some source be reliable better than the locals of Jalpaiguri.I do understand what you have said about giving liable sources but the way you deliver it to me is quit rude and as you are British you better get rid of your mastering behaviour.You better keep your nose stick to your own business.

Ashimipi (talk) 06:41, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources which explains this, and WP:Verifiability for the reasons information must be sourced.
"the locals of Jalpaiguri" are not a reliable source, and what they "know" cannot be verified, so any such claims cannot be included in Wikipedia articles.
Please ensure that any future edits you make are supported by proper references - see Help:Referencing for beginners for how to do this
Thank you - Arjayay (talk

) 10:17, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

What's going on with that article? I see all sorts of stuff being added without citations and possibly some edit warring (not sure). Let me know if some admin action is required. --regentspark (comment) 15:18, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

much appricated on the assisstance for the sin city page and aathe correct fomating infomation. I was able to insert a number of links founde on this club, and greatly appicate your assistance in helping with the correct fomatiing — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dictionary2015 (talk • contribs) 14:18, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

In no way am I "vandalizing" this page. I'm merely adding "citations needed". Can we please escalate this issue to the proper people asap? I do not like being threatened when nothing wrong has been done. Thank you.

You are adding large numbers of citation needed tags all falsely dated as July 2012 - as this has been pointed out to you, but you have continued to add these false dates, this is clear disruption. - Arjayay (talk) 14:52, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Fuck u u fat cunt. Go and die in a hole, mother fucker. You shut the fuck up or I will put you to your grave. Capeach? I 84.45.238.145 (talk) 20:53, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

My section header - Arjayay (talk) 20:56, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

You erased an edition in the wikipedia page of the Catalan Independence referendum of 2007 in which I stated that until now there is no evidence that the images of people voting twice or more are false. I would like to know if you have information that contradicts this or, if not, why do you think that information about people being able to vote twice in a referendum like this is not important enoug to be here.

Proving a negative is always difficult, but anyone can claim that any images, or any other claims, are false, without presenting any evidence whatsoever; which is what you did, and why I reverted it.
You need to prove that the images are false, or at least provide evidence, from

independent sources that they are probably false. - Arjayay (talk

) 21:08, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi greetings, I saw that you undid the edits made by me in some articles. I only added the name of the place in malayalam.--PATH SLOPU ^(Talk) 10:52, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi User:Path slopu - As explained on your talk page, such additions contravene NO:INDICSCRIPT, so please stop - Arjayay (talk) 10:54, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for your valuable advice. I will never try to do this type of indic scripts in enwiki. I saw this is used in other articles and I added this script like them.--PATH SLOPU ^(Talk) 11:00, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

		The Good Friend Award
		Thank you for your advice about indic scripts to me. If you didn't say it I would place it in more articles. You told about the WP:INDICSCRIPTS. Thank you for your valuable advice. This is for you. Thank you. PATH SLOPU (Talk ) 11:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

		The Original Barnstar
		This is for your valuable efforts for contributing to Wikipedia PATH SLOPU (Talk) 13:16, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

In no way am I "vandalizing" this page. I'm merely editing some rather sloppy work. Can we please escalate this issue to the proper people asap? I do not like being threatened when nothing wrong has been done. Thank you.

WP:ANI, but it appears that your edit has now "stuck" and I suspect ANI will consider a complaint, about a single reversion, is rather trivial.
As an aside, I think you should read Help:Referencing for beginners so that your references are properly formatted in the future, and please sign all posts on talk pages with 4 tildes ( ~~~~ ) which will add your signature and a timestamp - Thanks - Arjayay (talk

) 08:14, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

) 15:03, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

		The Guidance Barnstar
		This is for your valuable advices and guidance given to me about overlinking in articles. Thank you. PATH SLOPU (Talk) 15:07, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Autism Speaks

Sorry about the revert, I clicked the wrong version and when I went to fix it you beat me to it. Thanks for cleaning it up.PackMecEng (talk) 15:54, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi PackMecEng - no worries - we all make mistakes, especially when there is edit warring going on - Arjayay (talk) 15:56, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello, You have reverted 6 of my edits citing, WP:Notdirectory; i read the section https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_directory and I don't understand which part of it I violated. There are 1700 temples under the management of Andhra Pradesh endowments department (through Trust Boards) and I am planning to create a page for all of them. To start with I have listed them in the district pages. I am learning to create individual pages for each temple in that list.

I am new here and you seem have plenty of experience. Could you please undo the deletion and guide me through the page creation process. Thank you. SaiLakkaraju (talk) 21:20, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi

WP:NOTDIR we do not want lists without context information. Furthermore, your entries totally dominated the articles to which they were added - e.g. at East Godavari district your list took up 10 screens, whilst the rest of the article took just 7 screens. The article is about East Godavari district, and should not be dominated by any subsection.
If you wish to create a List of Temples in East Godavari district. please read and follow Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists. I am also concerned about a possible copyright violation - the website you have cited clearly states it is copyright, so you cannot just copy vast amounts of information from their site and paste it into Wikipedia. I don't know how else you can obtain and format the information, but that needs to be resolved before creating multiple list-articles.
As for my undoing the deletions - no, I won't, but you can retrieve the information from the page history, click on your version of the page in the history, and then click the edit tab, this will allow you to copy the table including the wikicode - Arjayay (talk

) 16:42, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Greetings Arjayay, thank you for your reply. A small program reads input files and prepares Wikipedia tables for me. If you check the timestamps of my 6 edits they combinedly took me 30~40 minutes. That for copy pasting and manual verification. So, I am least bothered about your edits WRT data loss. There are more than 25 thousand temples in Andhra Pradesh and I will be documenting them online. I have chosen Wikipedia as once entered it will be stored for the rest of the life of Wikipedia as current or as history. I like your idea of standalone lists. May be that is the way to go. Build stand alone lists and populate them into new pages. Could you please also guide me to an article (template/ example) about creating a new page for a temple (church or mosque). Finally, coming to the copyright violation, I have provided references, have not used all the data (not even 10% of the website), I will check with my lawyer and will get back to you. Could you please guide me to the legal department of Wikipedia so that I can work with them as well. Thank you for your time and kind consideration. SaiLakkaraju (talk) 00:11, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. See this RSN discussion. And this "Despite the technicaJ explanations and elaborate coding rubric, the underlying framework reflects the persistence of scientific racism and discredited anthropological classification systems. As a result, one theologian laments that the 10/40 Window concept and people group research are based on outdated anthropology, poorquality geography and questionable theology, and comments that this combination has become "another colonial burden that has to be borne" (Rynkiewich 2007, 225)." That's not in 10/40 window nor is this which I might ask for at resource request. Sadly it's widely used in our articles.[1]Doug Weller talk 14:08, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

User:Doug Weller - I fully agree, it is a regular problem - especially in Indian sub-continent and African articles. We have an ethnic warrior on the Pashtuns article, extrapolating figures from articles, whether or not there are actually any figures in the cited articles. Could I ask you to take a look? - Thanks - Arjayay (talk) 14:39, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

3RR warning given, let me know if he reverts you. Doug Weller talk 16:53, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Hey Arjayay,

In that case, the only term that needs to be changed back is eggplant to aubergine. Chevon is the proper culinary term for goat meat regardless of the variety of English, as indicated on its page. My changes had many other grammatical corrections as well; could you revert it back and change the one word to aubergine? Also, in the future, could you post discussions like these on the article's talk page rather than just directly reverting changes?

Thanks, Varun — Preceding unsigned comment added by Getsnoopy (talk • contribs) 12:10, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi Getsnoopy - firstly, please sign all posts on talk pages with 4 tildes ( ~~~~ ) which will add your signature and a timestamp
As for your request, there appear to be two problems:-

1. In addition to changing "goat" to "chevon", you were substituting multiple references to "mutton" by "goat meat/chevon". Mutton is sheep, not goat, so you would need to provide references to justify each of those changes, not only to show that goat was correct, but also that mutton was incorrect.
2. Although chevon may be "the proper culinary term" for goat meat, it is not widely understood. Wikipedia does not want to "dumb-down" its articles, but it wants them to be understood by as many people as possible. There is, therefore, a basic principle of
   WP:COMMONALITY
   , that we should use widely understood terms.

As for your grammatical corrections, I will reinstate those shortly - Arjayay (talk) 12:31, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi Arjayay,

1. That is exactly my point. Biryani is almost always made with goat meat, not sheep meat. This is corroborated by citation 18 on the page itself and also by the article referenced here.^[1]
2. In the spirit of
   WP:COMMONALITY then, the choice term should be goat meat or simply goat since that's what its article
   is named. Mutton is simply incorrect in the places where I replaced it regardless of its popularity. The article also refers to certain varieties of biryani using lamb as the meat of choice which is unambiguous; you'll notice I didn't change these instances.

- Getsnoopy (talk) 12:54, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Dear Arjayay, The previous name was 'Ukarh' or 'Nagarukhra'. Ukhra is a census town in Paschim Burdwan (Link:ukhra-wikipedia article). But this article, which actual name is 'Ukrah' or 'Nagarukhra', is situated in Nadia district. (Link:ukrah village detail & google map detail).

• Link:census data of India

If you kindly change the specific names of this article, then it will be easy to get the proper & reliable information. Iamakashnathsarkar (talk) 14:32, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Iamakashnathsarkar Thank you for pointing out my mistake, I have corrected the title in the infobox. Arjayay (talk) 14:49, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello Arjayay, im new to the Wikipedia, SO i need to know about wikipedia, I need your Help to know about wikipedia, can you help me please ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Naveenreddygnr (talk • contribs) 15:54, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi

The_Wikipedia_Adventure which will teach you most of the basics - enjoy - Arjayay (talk

) 16:17, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Arjayay Thank you, Actually i need to add a Article on Wikipedia, So i checked some basics in which to upload a new image, we need at least 10 edits, thats y im finding mistakes whether it is small or big in articles --NaveenReddy Gnr (talk) 16:31, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

I placed the information in the article based on the various articles in the wikipedia articles. So You think Wikipedia Articles are provided wrong information ? --NaveenReddy Gnr (talk) 04:35, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Arjayay. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{

ygm}} template.NaveenReddy Gnr (talk

) 04:38, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

NaveenReddy Gnr if you "Need to talk with me" please do so here. I do not communicate with other editors via WhatsApp, Facebook or any other social media - thank you - Arjayay (talk) 08:01, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

I don't know what happened on that edit and now the user name is fixed. I was just using the automatic tool Twinkle to notice that user. I think because you are the last user leaving a message on that talk page, then Twinkle accidentally did a wrong operation. Sorry for that. — Phenolla ⚫️🔵  15:20, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For your huge counter vandalism contribution. Thank you. ---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 18:39, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting the problematic edits by

Per Wikipedia:Proposed_deletion as a page editor, you are being informed of the proposed deletion of the page.

Proposed deletion of Carol Morgan

The article Carol Morgan has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Reason: Subject does not wish to have page. --JEM1406a (talk) 12:11, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

so thank you !!! Đông Minh (talk) 13:31, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For your outstanding efforts and determination in keeping this place free of disruption/vandalism. Keep up the great work! - LouisAragon (talk) 23:09, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

I am resident of village I know it personally Gurvarandeep (talk) 12:46, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi

reliable published sources have said about a subject and those sources must be cited as references to support any additions or changes you may wish to make, as all information should be verifiable.
Any information added or changed without a citation to a reliable published source is liable to be deleted or reverted. - Arjayay (talk

) 08:42, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

I welcome your keen interest in what I posted/corrected. As regards my source of contribution so let me say it loud and clear that I'm his descendant and have books(hand-written) in my possession that only belong to his grandsons and great grandsons. What proof do you have of He being a follower of Baha ud Din Zakariya? Would you like to share? I was brought and raised here in the land where Sher Shah Sayed Jala ud Din served his holy cause. You want to take it personally-i can't help you but the truth is he was his father's mureed(follower/influenced). As regards Aitchison College, so the name I mentioned was the 1st prime minister of the state of aitchisonia-a college only for the chiefs of punjab then! Makhdoomzada (talk) 11:37, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi

reliable published sources have already said about a subject and those sources must be cited as references to support any additions or changes you may wish to make, as all information should be verifiable.
Any information added or changed without a citation to a reliable published source, is liable to be deleted or reverted, which is why your changes keep being reverted. - Arjayay (talk

) 08:52, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

             Myself maverickindian i started writing my second article with utmost care. Please give a glance at my article, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Maverickindian/sandbox.As you made my first article slate the school in a proper manner. i thought it would be great if i show this article to you. before sending it for wiki approval.

Thanking you --Maverickindian (talk) 06:56, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

i am a kachwaha rajput myself and we are not connected with kachwaha kachis and koeris of other states they are different people and we are different. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ksiksiksi (talk • contribs) 09:48, 30 September 2018 (UTC) you can check our websitehttp://togawask.blogspot.com/2017/02/68.html

Hi

reliable published sources have said about a subject and those sources must be cited as references to support any additions or changes you make.
Please note that blogs, such as the one you have referred to, and any other self-published information, are not acceptable sources, as they are not reliable.
All information should be verifiable and any information added or changed without a citation to a reliable published source is liable to be deleted or reverted. - Arjayay (talk

) 09:59, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

OK I WILL COME UP WITH EVIDENCE ON KACHWAHA AND MAJOR DHYANCHAND'S FAMILY AS THE CASTE OF THESE TWO HEROES OF RAJPUTS ARE BEING TRIED TO CHANGE BUT STILLT HEIR FAMILY IS ALIVE AND YES WE HAVE MANY DOCUMENTS I WILL UPLOAD IN A WEEK. WELL I HAVE CONNECTION WITH HIS FAMILY AND WILL PRODUCE EVIDENCE — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ksiksiksi (talk • contribs) 10:18, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

reliable published sources have already said about a subject. - Arjayay (talk

) 10:30, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

why are you reverting changes , and trying to promote an ambuguity about Rajput shiromani Major dhyanchand bains . The reference i quoted is a research paper in a reputed journal. Dont try to revert it again, without any proper reference with you which mentions his caste.International Journal of Physical Education, Sports and Health 2016; 3(6): 327-331[1]  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ksiksiksi (talk • contribs) 15:22, 2 October 2018 (UTC) 

Reliable sources and to stop trying to promote your caste, or you will be blocked - Arjayay (talk

)

Ksiksiksi as has already been pointed out by User:Utcursch when he deleted it, the "International Journal of Physical Education" is NOT at all "reputable", it is not even an acceptable source, as it just copies an old version of the English Wikipedia article - Arjayay (talk) 15:46, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

I agree, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Journal of Physical Education, Fitness and Sports. Doug Weller talk 18:10, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi Arjayay, you removed the following line from Act 2 Cam in a recent edit, citing puffery:

The company is notable for their student-centred and and existential approach. They encourage and guide young people to celebrate their individuality, ask their own questions and develop their own unique understandings.

The company has a self-declared child-centred and existential approach, and has been reported as such in the media. I agree the second part of that sentence sounds gushy, but the first part is factually accurate.

Obsteve (talk) 19:40, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi

independent, third-parties have published. This would include the " self-declared child-centred and existential approach" you refer to above. That is also a "Mission statement" which are also not allowed - please see Wikipedia:Avoid mission statements for the rationale. - Arjayay (talk

) 08:30, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi Arjayay, I will source some independent third party material and get back to you for approval in time. Many thanks for your help! Obsteve (talk) 12:19, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

this is user 103. can i ask you? are you administrator of this wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.66.223.15 (talk) 17:59, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Hello IP from Santo Tomas
Firstly, please put new posts into their own section, with a title, and sign all posts on talk pages with 4 tildes ( ~~~~ ) which will add your signature and a timestamp
As for your question; no, I am not an admin - just an ordinary editor - albeit with nearly 11 years experience and over 194,000 edits.
I have had to revert a number of your recent edits, because they were totally unsourced, and contradicted the existing references, and was about to warn you about those - please do not add, or change, any information in any of our articles without citing a

reliable source that verifies that the addition or change you have made is correct.
For more information on how to create such references, please see Help:Referencing for beginners - Thank you - Arjayay (talk

) 18:51, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Please explain your removal. What is unsourced? --85.211.171.152 (talk) 14:30, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Our edits crossed - At 14.21 you re-added the actor with a source, and the location, without a source. I, therefore, edited that version and removed the location as it was unsourced. However, in the meantime, between my starting to edit the page and my saving it, you had added a source. Normally, this would have given me an "edit conflict" warning telling me that the page had been altered in the meantime, but for some reason it did not. I then went back to revert my deletion, but you had done that yourself in the meantime. - Arjayay (talk) 14:38, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

You are not making any sense. You have no excuse so you are just saying nonsense. There have been wikipedians like you who received their first block because of their ip biting. I will not report your behaviour in the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, but if I, you will definitely be warned if not blocked. Thank you--85.211.171.152 (talk) 14:51, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

You are falsifying data at Languages of India. If you have a problem with the sources used in the article, take it to the talk page.

Specifically, you are counting Maithili as Hindi while claiming you are not, and in addition duplicate it in the table, which means you're counting it twice. In addition, the census figure you're using is demonstrably incorrect. (There are about 40M speakers of Maithili, not 13M, because most speakers reported their language as 'Hindi' or 'Bihari' in the 2011 census.) Maithili also does not fit in the table, as the source does not use it. There's no purpose to adding languages to the table when we have no data for them (in this case, the number of L2 and L3 speakers). — kwami (talk) 00:00, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Thandi Alankaaram wrote by Dandin. Dandin Parun3247 (talk) 07:07, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

https://ta.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%AE%A4%E0%AE%A3%E0%AF%8D%E0%AE%9F%E0%AE%BF%E0%AE%AF%E0%AE%B2%E0%AE%99%E0%AF%8D%E0%AE%95%E0%AE%BE%E0%AE%B0%E0%AE%AE%E0%AF%8D Parun3247 (talk) 07:07, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

https://ta.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%AE%A4%E0%AE%A3%E0%AF%8D%E0%AE%9F%E0%AE%BF_(%E0%AE%B5%E0%AE%9F%E0%AE%AE%E0%AF%8A%E0%AE%B4%E0%AE%BF%E0%AE%AA%E0%AF%8D_%E0%AE%AA%E0%AF%81%E0%AE%B2%E0%AE%B5%E0%AE%B0%E0%AF%8D) Parun3247 (talk) 07:09, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi

reliable source - Arjayay (talk

) 09:46, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi Arjay - could you be able to give you wisdom on the talk page of my article Stephen Church regarding notability - a fellow editor seems to beleive he does not meet notability. I am not asking for your supoort just your constructive opinion as I regard your opinion as good.Davidstewartharvey (talk) 12:26, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi

WP:ACADEMIC, whereas the requirement is just to meet one of the criteria, not all of them. I seem to recall that there are ways of using Google Scholar to assess the impact of an academic, but I have no idea how this works. Sorry I can't help further. - Arjayay (talk

) 12:48, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Thats ok Arjayay the page was reviewed by a new page reviewer and ok'd, so I have asked them as the have administrator rights too for their opinion. Thanks for the prompt response - and thatnks again for correcting my typos.Davidstewartharvey (talk) 16:19, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Whoops, looks like we rolled back at the same time I'm going to leave the warning up on the talk page though the IP's been blocked before. --Whispering 17:06, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi User:Whispering - no worries, it is easily done - it used to be clearer when an edit was not successful, but now only shows an edit conflict on some occasions and not on others - Arjayay (talk) 17:10, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi Arjay. Thank you for the information regarding the content addition in the article Nanjangud. I will add references soon. Nsoujanya (talk) 15:37, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Yes that is correct. Thank you for making the correction within the undo. --Ishmailer (talk) 11:00, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Dear Arjayay reverting any edits that you personally disagree with and calling them vandalism or pseudoscience (apart from contravening Wikipedia Neutral Point of View guidelines) is the reason the general public have a diminishing regard for the usefulness of wikipedia as a resource. Like you I consider this a shame. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.146.223.69 (talk • contribs) 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Arjayay, PLEASE RESPOND TO MY MESSAGE ON Magstyso. I also ask you to go to http://www.hellfirecorner.co.uk/thankful.htm and read what they have to say about Doubly Thankful Villages. Bradbourne, Derbyshire is listed as a DTV and has a (D) Butterton, Staffordshire is listed as a DTV and does NOT have a (D) P.S Where is 'email this user' in the panel on the left ??Magstyso (talk) 20:27, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Answered on users talk page - Arjayay (talk) 15:21, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Therefore I request you to please write an article about such a notable journalist, if you think I am lying just check out his YouTube channel . Modibhakt (talk) 10:00, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi

reliable sources - Arjayay (talk

) 10:09, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

List of Old Emanuels (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Arthur James, George Spencer, James Vaughan, George Stephens and Henry Sanders

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the instruction. I took me little a bit, but I found Wikipedia:Image_use_policy#Displayed_image_size on my own. I understand it now. The result of your changes did not wreck the layout.

• I personally prefer the margin images be generally larger than the gallery images though, and enlarging some of them with upright would be OK with you?
• The two lead images were set to fill in some of the annoying white space of of the TOC.
• The critical sections were I have the combined left and right images over a gallery look good as you left them.
  • Even if it technically a text sandwich, I selected images that were not wide, and I like how the layout presents an arrangement multiple images around an intentionally limited amount of text.
• My style of 5 image galleries seems more stable using upright, thanks.
• I want the welcome post to be the height of the list.
• Benecke and Gardner are not meant to be seen in the small!

Thanks again! IveGoneAway (talk) 01:05, 10 November 2018 (UTC) 01:05, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi IveGoneAway
That is much better, but, personally, I don't like the images besides the ToC, particularly the over-sizing; although some (other) editors routinely move images that sandwich text or tables, but that was not my concern. I wonder if the number of images could be reduced? but again I'm happy to leave them as is.
Many editors do not understand that px prevents users choosing their own image size, to suit their screen, whilst others try to get a "perfect" layout without realizing that it can appear totally different on a small screen, a wall-sized screen, a tablet, or a phone.
Happy editing - Arjayay (talk) 11:07, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Thank you. For me geology and historic architecture is a very visual subject. I think images in the lead crowd the text and accentuate the lead's isolation from the main that results from an overly long TOC (I wish I knew how to get the TOC limit to work). I have been taking pictures of the subject for 4 years, and I limited myself to 5 pictures per sectional gallery, one gallery per section. Under the identification and fossil sections, there is a lot of material, I would rather have pictures of the subject rather than text. If the choice was between a picture or a paragraph ... well, I did have a few cases where I had to come up with enough text to justify pictures I wanted to show ... which is a good thing because the text contributes the the subject.

FWIW, I had no idea this was going on, but apparently there is a movement to make Post Rock Country a historic district. Last week they had a meeting in Lucas and discussed the Fencepost article:

[The article is]] one of the most exhaustive resources about our region "Post Rock Country". It was also the subject of a meeting today at the theatre in Lucas, well attended and co-hosted by Kansas Tourism.'

Thank you everyone for the help and opportunity. IveGoneAway (talk) 14:19, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi IveGoneAway
I have taken the liberty of changing {{TOC limit|1}} (which doesn't work) to {{TOC limit|3}} which just excludes the sections with more than 3 = signs, each side of the section title. If that is not what you want, please feel free to alter. - Arjayay (talk) 14:29, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Thank you, never thought that that 2 would mean one level, which is what i wanted. Thank you , again. I can now put the monument where I wanted, if I could have the TOC at one level.

Please don't revert my fully referenced edits which reflect the de jure name of this political sub-unit of the state of Uttar Pradesh. Whilst I can fully understand reluctance to change the smae of the settlement of Allahabad / Prayagraj due to COMMONNAME, I don't see how this applies to a district which is not a settlement but a political entity. There is president for the change as Faizabad District was renamed a few days ago to Ayodhya District and this is already reflected on Wikipedia (including a change in article title) with no controversy. Cordyceps-Zombie (talk) 16:28, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi Cordyceps-Zombie - AFAIK it applies throughout the English Wikipedia, I know of no distinction between "settlements" and "political sub-units" The reader coming across the article may think they are in the wrong place when all the references are to a name other than the article title. - Arjayay (talk) 16:32, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Then perhaps it is the name of the article that needs changisn as in the case of the article relating to Ayodhya District. It is actually misleading telling the reader that there is a district in India known as "Allahabad District" when no such district now exists. Cordyceps-Zombie (talk) 16:35, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

The article title is very specifically the subject of

WP:COMMONNAME - Arjayay (talk

) 16:37, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Belgaum name is officially changed to Belagavi and why you are changing the official name of Belagavi. You learn about the place and then talk to me...!!! I'm a resident of Belagavi...!!! You must know this...!!! Vardhamanvkhanapur (talk) 11:33, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

WP:COMMONNAME in English.
As a comparison, we still have an article on Bangalore, NOT Bengaluru, despite the name changing "officially" in 2006.
Please do not change the spelling again. Thank you - Arjayay (talk

) 11:37, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

You are most welcome.

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:53, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for being ever so vigilant. —Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 15:18, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. INeedSupport^{(Care free to give me support?)} 16:14, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

INeedSupport Deleting unsourced claims and speculation, which should not have been added, is not the same as edit-warring - Arjayay (talk) 16:18, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

@Arjayay: I do agree that those additions are unsourced and speculative. However, the edit warring rule still applies per this sentence: "An editor who repeatedly restores his or her preferred version is edit warring, regardless of whether their edits were justifiable: 'But my edits were right, so it wasn't edit warring' is no defense." INeedSupport^{(Care free to give me support?)} 16:25, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

I nominated "Lot No. 249" for GA; would you like to review it?MagicatthemovieS (talk) 16:50, 19 November 2018 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS

Hi MagicatthemovieS, thanks for the offer, but I think it should be done by someone who has at least read it - I have no idea whether the synopsis is accurate, or not - Arjayay (talk) 16:53, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

@Arjayay:If you are interested, the story (which is quite short) can be accessed through the WikiSource link at the bottom of the story 's Wiki article. It shouldn't take too long to read.MagicatthemovieS (talk) 17:18, 19 November 2018 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS

Putting World War One names in [[]] on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Old_Emanuels Why is this being done all of a sudden and added again if removed?

I found this unsigned post between two others near the top of the page earlier today, I see from the page history it was added on 10 November - I will explain on the article talk page shortly - Arjayay (talk) 17:32, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

The post was by me but can't remember my old username so that is why it was unsigned. New user name is Mick Travis If https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MickTravis_If

Hello, Arjayay. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Arjayay. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ankapur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ICAR (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Sorry about that nice clean blocklog of yours! ——SerialNumber54129 17:20, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Thanks Serial Number 54129 - for both the beer and your posts at User talk:Esanchez7587. Hopefully lessons about the security of admin accounts can be learnt, before the next time. - Arjayay (talk) 19:31, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Yes, silver linings, and all that; now you come to mention it, there's this  :) ——SerialNumber54129 19:35, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Thanks for reverting that edit on the David Irving page. I've just revision deleted your reversion in order to hide the material from view via the article's history given that its a fairly serious BLP violation. This of course no reflection at all on your action; the need to revision delete the edit is just the result of an annoying technical quirk. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 22:19, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Seems like this page needs to be protected again. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:15, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Fylindfotberserk - I'm sure you are right, but I have found that several admins dealing with RPP requests want 3 IPs before they protect a page, or they just block the IP(s) instead - we have had 2 so far today, so I'd wait for another, but if you want to go ahead, please do so. - Arjayay (talk) 15:29, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Bengali Brahmins - if you want to add that to your watchlist - Arjayay (talk

) 15:31, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

I think you are right. We can wait for the 3rd one. I already have

Bengali Brahmins in my watchlist. Fylindfotberserk (talk

) 15:47, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

I've requested page protection. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:55, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Fylindfotberserk - I know - I had an edit conflict with your request, when I tried adding it - ! - Arjayay (talk) 09:58, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Atleast they blocked this IP. It will force this troll to use other IPs and hopfully we can get three IPs and then the Admins might take a look into the matter. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:51, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

My Article Abhishek Lodha and Vikram Singh Oberoi The Both Are Famous Personality In India Abhishek Lodha is Managing Director of Lodha Group India Number One Real Estate Company

Vikram Singh Oberoi is CEO Oberoi Hotels Son of Hospitality Tycoon Prithvi Raj Singh Oberoi And Grandson of Rai Bahadur Mohan Singh Oberoi Founder of The

Hi RAUS India
The article on Abhishek Lodha was deleted once being non-notable, and a second version was moved from article space for being inadequate, whilst that on Vikram Singh Oberoi was also moved as it was deemed inadequate.
As for Samrat Singh Kapurpur, that article has already been deleted twice, as the person has been deemed to be non-notable, and it is probably about to be deleted again.
Please only add people to lists of "notable people" who already have their own articles - Thanks - Arjayay (talk) 11:41, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Thank You Arjayay

I Will Try My Best To Do Good For Wikipedia And People of India. RAUS India (talk) 11:45, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

OK RAUS India - but please stop typing in "Camel case" - thanks - Arjayay (talk) 11:47, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Note for the archive - user blocked as sock of User:Samrat Singh Jaunpur - Arjayay (talk) 13:05, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

I edited the Ilara Mokin page this November. Given the fact that my family is from the town, I assume I can edit the page. There were no instructions to add the references to the edits and If you asked me to before deleting, I would have. I didn't see anyone add any other references to the previously stated comments, so why? Thank you and I will reedit the page. 24.186.189.231 (talk) 01:09, 19 November 2018 (UTC) Oniwe

Hi

WP:Other stuff, we do not accept bad edits in one article as a reason for allowing them in another.
I see that another set of very similar unsourced additions has since been made at the Ilara-Mokin article, which I have also reverted, along with the blank sections and the "notable people" who were not "notable" in Wikipedias use of the word, as neither person had an article. The same rules apply to people using an account as to people editing as an IP.
If you have any questions, please come back and ask here, or, as I am not always about, ask at the Help desk or the Teahouse - Arjayay (talk

) 17:20, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Sorry for the mistakes and thank you for clarifying. Is it good for me to post here? Thanks again, I am just new to Wikipedia editing. Oniwe (talk) 22:24, 26 November 2018 (UTC)Oniwe

Respected Sir/Madam, The name of faizabad district is now officially changed to Ayodhya District as notification is issued Governor for the same....here is the source https://m.navbharattimes.indiatimes.com/metro/lucknow/other-news/notification-released-by-governor-house-for-ayodhya-district/articleshow/66777278.cms

Since the name is Ayodhya district now, so having article title as Faizabad district would be misleading....kindly either change article name to Ayodhya district to redirect it to the Ayodhya district page... Regards Thekkverma (talk) 10:28, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

WP:COMMONNAME in English.
As a comparison, we still have an article on Bangalore, NOT Bengaluru, despite the name changing "officially" in 2006.
Please do not redirect this again. Thank you - Arjayay (talk

) 10:34, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Got your point...can the page Ayodhya district be restarted with new content without copying from Faizabad page and redirect be removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thekkverma (talk • contribs) 10:41, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Thekkverma - No, we only have one article on each subject, hence the use of the redirect at Ayodhya District. - Arjayay (talk) 10:45, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Ok...keep it up... Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thekkverma (talk • contribs) 10:46, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

"Half knowledge is a dangerous thing " it really suits you. I have edited the list of famous Gujjar politicians of Pakistan and added Ch Abid Raza Kotla and Tanvir Ashraf Kaira are very much famous persons. Abid is twice elected MNA and his brother is district chairman Gujrat, Kaira is active politician and Former Finance Minister Punjab, it does imply that they are famous parliamentarians and not unknown persons like you. Always think positive and grow up! Regards Dr Salman Chohan (talk) 12:51, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Dr Salman Chohan - Our lists of people are restricted to people with articles. If you feel that these politicians are notable enough for inclusion, then please WP:Write the article first - and, if/when the articles are accepted, they then can be added. Until then further re-additions will be seen as disruptive editing. - Arjayay (talk) 12:58, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

You are welcome sir.

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:34, 6 December 2018 (UTC)