User talk:Artist Formerly Known As Whocares

Kimimaro Kaguya has an article. It is FAR below the standard page requirement (10,000 if I'm correct) but unlike the other two Lows (Sai and Yamato) he had a good place that fits. Just wanted to let you know.TheUltimate3 17:11, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are not an admin, hence you cannot protect pages. If you wish to submit a request for page protection, see

Sorry, and I already suggested (you were just 30 seconds late). User:Artist Formerly Known As Whocares, 15:00 (Eastern Stanard Time), 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Would you happen to own the Naruto manga translated by Viz? If so, can you add the ISBN for each volume in the ref section? Again, this is only if you possess the English manga book(s). See me for any questions or concerns, if you'd like. Lord Sesshomaru

They're for verification, just standard protocal. This way, others can confirm whether you're referring to the right graphic novel or not. Either the first or second barcode you place is fine. See the ones given at this section for reference. Lord Sesshomaru

I don't see why its confusing. Pick either one, here's another example: Dr. Slump, Volume 2 — note that there's usually an ISBN 13 or ISBN 10, correct? I'll pick, let's say, the ISBN 10 one. Here's is how you type it,

ISBN 1-59116-951-8 (make sure you don't include the "10" or "13" because it appears to not work that way). Clicking on the link will lead you to a special page titled "Book sources". Scroll down to the "Online databases" section, click on one of those links (World Cat, Google, etc.) and ta-da! It should take you to the book you claim to be using. Okay? Lord Sesshomaru

You said you owned the graphic novel volumes up to 13, right? Perhaps you could put the other remaining ones here in this new section? Lord Sesshomaru

You are a sane person, so please, believe me!!!!!!! Tobi is not Madara!!! -Tobi4242 01:40, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yes, I some how was also convinced, but it is still hard to belive, I mean someone like madara would never act like tobi, witch is why i was so against this idea. -Tobi4242 01:56, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.  uniQue tree →talk← 20:31, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

You're not allowed to copy and paste articles. Have a look at

Because the Sources section is the lazy version of the References section. It is what is used when nobody has gotten around to actually indicating where a piece of information can be found. When there are a reasonably large amount of legitimate references, there's no reason to have the inadequate substitute anymore. ~SnapperTo 03:11, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sesshomaru started a move request for Kurama (YuYu Hakusho) - He wants it to be moved to "Yoko Kurama" WhisperToMe 22:26, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you have the poll data issue, it would be most helpful if you could place the issue name, page(s), and ISBN for verification in a <ref></ref> style. Itachi is needing them, along with all the other Naruto characters with main articles including Naruto, Guy, Sasuke, Kakashi, Neji and various others. Lord Sesshomaru 16:41, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still wondering why you removed the bibliography section from Naruto. For Itachi, the term "popular" sounds point of view-ish and opinionated; while he's popular to some, he isn't to others. In my opinion, "favoured" sounds more appropiate there. There is no ISBN listed for those popularity polls anywhere. Lord Sesshomaru 16:57, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see, though why use the controversial term "popular" over the "favoured"? Again, there is no ISBN for the Shonen Jump popularity polls, that you can add. Though if you choose not to, I can't quite encourage you. Lord Sesshomaru 17:08, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Understood about the ISBNs, they're not required or recommended upon any rule for that matter anyway, I won't carry that on. That one phrase in Itachi's article; "Itachi is immensely popular among many fans" seems bias from one perspective. If we were to reword it to something like "Itachi is most favoured among many fans of Naruto" or "Itachi is [immensely] favoured among many Naruto fans" then we might not have a problem. Popular would be more like The Terminator or Star Wars; on the other hand, Dragon Ball, could be considered popular for being one of the most influential Japanese works. Should I contact another member to place their thought on this here? Lord Sesshomaru 17:41, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have a good point, here are a few thesaurus words: accepted, well-liked, likable, eye-catching, prominent, well-known, accepted, most-liked, pleasing, most-known, enjoyed, highest. Which would you agree with instead of "popular" or "favoured" for that matter? Lord Sesshomaru 17:59, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. {^_^} Lord Sesshomaru 18:03, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't know. There's probably a special page or bot or something that counts how many times a page was viewed. Where is this current article located? Lord Sesshomaru 18:11, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've given each and every one of those fanboys one of the policies even if I didn't link it directly.Sam ov the blue sand, Editor Review 04:45, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you happen to own the Viz-translated MÄR manga ? If you do could you tell me the name of the town Jack does his tradings (vol.2) and the castle populated by Vidar's trees (vol.3) ? Profet 666 00:39, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Will Wikipedia answer? Thats what I ask. I have already began helping get the site in pure working order....but its going to need alot of help. Good editors are needed and this is the only place I can think of.--TheUltimate3 16:57, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Buddy, hell has been going on. You already saw the images got purged, and now it appears like its us vs. them(admins) who in my opinion seems corrupt. In the meantime I started helping Narutopedia (http://naruto.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page) and because Wikipedia seems to be heading down a dark path, I asked you for help (see above 2 if I'm correct). I also started a Bleach wiki which I won't link to as its still in is VERY early development. Back to Wikipedia Prime, yes if you look at the Akatsuki members talk page, it is very fudged up, involving a large conspiracy and a rebellion of sorts. Hopefully things can be sorted in a civil and fair manner. Thats about all I got. Welcome back my friend.--TheUltimate3 20:12, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I fear he will not care. (You used his name, therefore I shall use it to. been refering to him as He Who Purged the Images as to not incriminate him among the rebels.) But it is a start, and the warning is just. Someone said we should have a discussion about it, to resolve the issue without going through all this drama. If our conditions (if we have conditions) are met and we are able to talk together as equals then hopefully this can be resolved quickly.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by TheUltimate3 (talk • contribs) 20:22, August 26, 2007 (UTC)

Which reminds me, so would you help even a little at Narutopedia? If you do it would be good to regester as this name, it would be easier to find you.--TheUltimate3 20:42, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As for the images themselves, you'll need to prove that each contributes significantly to the article and that they cannot be communicated through words alone. If you can do that then Durin has no policial-legs to stand on. ~SnapperTo 23:43, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• And you'll have a nigh on impossible job of doing that, given that a very broad range of articles have had similar image usages removed. This article isn't any different. We are a free content encyclopedia, not a repository of copyrighted images, regardless of how bad the absence of copyrighted images makes an article look. --Durin 20:30, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Careful friend, careful. Don't tred down a slippery path.--TheUltimate3 21:17, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

With regard to your comments on User talk:Durin: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Vassyana 21:13, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On Wikipedia, we comment on the content and not the editor. This comment of yours to Durin was extremely out of line and incivil (as is the whole thread that you jumped into). Please do not repeat these actions.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 21:14, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't do anything rash or hasty. Don't want to see you banned friend.--TheUltimate3 21:39, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I won't disagree that wasn't exactly friendly, I will admit I was angry at the fact he refuses to even recognize another's opinion and shuts them down automatically and makes major decisions about an articles' images (deleting them) without so much about posting it on the talk page beforehand. Keep this in mind, however, if I were to actually wish to insult him, it would have been very graphic (I'll say it again, I'm not someone to cross paths with when angry ^_^) Artist Formerly Known As Whocares 21:48, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, he's not a sysop, so he cannot delete them. Also, the "don't mess with me" attitude implying you're even more unpleasant when "actually" angry isn't going to be helpful to you here. Vassyana 21:57, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• If we were to debate every deletion under policy before the deletion takes place, Wikipedia would be a swamp. There's precedent, there's policy, and there's resolutions. All of them support my actions. I have always carefully checked that what I am doing is in line with our principles before doing it. I've made no judgments in isolation from anybody. My actions have been reviewed over and over and over again by a wide spectrum of administrators. I'm sorry you disagree with the actions. You are welcome to debate the general issues at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content if you like. It should be telling that I've performed something on the order of eight thousand fair use image abuse corrections over the last year and a half without a single reversion of those actions that stuck. I'm very careful in what I do, because I wholeheartedly believe in the mission of Wikipedia. If I acted independent of Wiki thought on these subjects, policy, resolutions and precedent, I would have been blocked on numerous occasions or by now banned from the project. You will note the emptiness of my block log [2], other than a mistaken block. --Durin 22:00, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Somehow I don't think you guys understood the jest (joke) in his "angry" comment. I got it, plain as day...EXPANSION also, I know alot of people dissagree with the Crusade of None Free crap that is going on right now, but its just the (excuse my language, no personal attack intended) the jerkassedness of how you put the policy out. You merely appear, delete, say policy and when people try to comment you (again excuse the language) jerkassedly recite the policy, ignore them and go on and that drives people crazy. Nobody likes being ignored.--TheUltimate3 23:08, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are plenty of avenues for people to express displeasure with admins. You can go

dispute resolution. If you really object to the reading of the policy, you could also raise it on the policy's talk page. Also, you may disagree with the fundamental position on non-free content, but it's not up for negotiation.[3] Vassyana 00:35, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Wow... it is true, bad news does travel fast. ;_; And you still don't seem to get the point: people like to be informed. For example, people would be more likely to agree with you sooner, Durin, should you post on the talk page that you would be deleting majority/most/all images on a page and why. If that isn't done... well, the former

List of Akatsuki members article that was deleted because of this lack of communication could happen several more times, especially with popular articles (popular as in viewed a very large amount of times per day). Artist Formerly Known As Whocares 19:23, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

But anyway - it was supposed to be a way to show Durin how he's being irrational without breaking policy or fully ruining the article. He already put the page up for merge so that he could justify calling it a character list, and thus, "unworthy of having non-free images".KrytenKoro 21:39, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you show Kishimoto-sensei's version of the creature, a picture is pointless. Artist Formerly Known As Whocares 19:37, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you said on akatsuki talk page you needed a template for the refs, right? It's on my page if you want it.Sam ov the blue sand, Editor Review 20:52, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see you used it, took you awhile though. ^_^ I hate templates, what about you?Sam ov the blue sand, Editor Review 22:37, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ughh its totally getting out of hand. Please just don't simply merge articles without reaching a decision among editors. You must understand, some people don't have free time. Now to business. I believe you really really want to merge Shinji and Isshin. I have my reasons for keeping them. Firstly, Isshin is afterall one of the secondary characters as he is an ex-shinigami, with one hell of a spoiler if we merged him and put him into the characters page. Shinji, you already know, is one of the main vizards and I really think he deserves his page, although you are right, it is a little stubby. Regardless of

While that may be true, that Isshin and Shinji isn't as notable as I point out, the vizard page needs a whole new makeover if you were to merge Shinji's article because the format is just bleh. But, to merge Isshin's article is one of the most difficult, simarly to Mayuri or Ukitake, due to the HUGE spoiler and the content of information such as the character outline. I think though, Yumichika is much like Shinji and Isshin, its stubby and won't survive without the synopsis. Like I said, we should concentrate on improving the standard of the articles, first with Ichigo, Orihime and Rukia.--Hanaichi 12:11, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop merging the article

Note that you should put a bold support next your post if that is your stated intention. It makes it easier for the closing editor to detect, and firmly declares your stance. Thanks. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 06:51, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you give the other Knights and major Bishops and Rooks their own bios like you did with Phantom, Halloween, Peta, and Loco? I was hoping that their pictures can be saved upon this request before they're deleted. Rtkat3 (talk) 1:49, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

I was planning to, but I was sidetracked elsewhere. I'll begin starting again either today or tomorrow. Artist Formerly Known As Whocares 19:49, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand why you are going about doing this, but this is a little to much and is probably getting the articles unneeded attention, more than they don't need.--TheUltimate3 21:28, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Pano (MÄR), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the

remove the Membership status in the Akatsuki article?--Blue-EyesGold Dragon 00:13, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not complaining, i just want to know, so can you please answer?--Blue-EyesGold Dragon 12:35, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

oh ok--Blue-EyesGold Dragon 00:15, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for condensing the synopsis sections in some of the articles. I'll try and do some to, but school is currently killing me right now. The Ichigo, Orihime, Ishida, Sado and Rukia synopsis definetely have to be condensed, but I know it will take some time. They are the MAIN characters after all, right?--Hanaichi 05:37, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I second that. This practice is good and should be continued, although care should be taken each time a summary is trimmed from, say, 10 paragraphs, to 1-2. Still, keep going and don't be discouraged by changes made to your edits. -- Ynhockey ^(Talk) 23:04, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Which do you second, shortening plot, or not giving Ichigo any? Artist Formerly Known As Whocares 23:09, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A Marpedia site has been established under Wikia property. If you'd like you can write out individual articles there too (that's what Wikia's like that are about). Rtkat3 (talk) 6:30, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

No worries. I saw no reason to apply a speedy-tag to it, and as a card-carrying deletionist who's normally pretty liberal wiht those tags, that's saying something.  ;-) Thanks, and take care. --Finngall ^talk 23:11, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure you jest.. We know next to nothing about the 1st War, while the 2nd War, well, I was under the impression I poured everything I know in to the MÄR-Heaven article. And by everything, I mean materials STRICTLY regarding the Wars - WARS! The Wars of MÄR-Heaven, its GENERAL information, not some in-depth details which tells us in-depth plots and then leaves us hopeless and lost as to what to cram in the character articles. The War Games takes up half the space of this War, but we already have an article for it. Or do you mean to take in every detail of the akts in the 2nd War ? In this case it's fine with me, though admittedly with exception to the King akt, the remaining akts - MÄR's journey in fake Tokyo, the encounter with Alibaba previous to the Final Battles, Ghost Chess akt - look pretty much.. personal. They don't concern the War - they do Team MÄR, so I'd like to have your opinion. Anyway I believe development will often have to put on hold (exams kill, and there're other series waiting, you know) but I can while my times away with it when waiting for the subs.

And I prefer you reverted your editions to the Chimera article (which is what I'm going to do). It's not all that uncommon to have the personality section first before the past section that you have to changed it - and in fact, when I start on developing the rest of the character articles, I will act accordingly. Profet 666 06:11, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well since my last talk I've been pondering over this, and while it might sound ridiculous coming from one who just days earlier said she was unsure whether to participate, I've come up with a general outline for this article. In case it has not occurred to you, here it goes:

- First MÄR-Heaven war: overall I agree with you about merging the War campaign with the War Game into one complete 1st War section. However personally I beg to differ with the following statement "The two, together with Gaira 3rd-in-command and Jake". While it might sound okay to you, to me this statement is equivalent to saying only Danna, Gaira, Alan and Jake entered the War Games - and we know this is singularly erroneous (click here for more information). You may leave the rest as it is (I'll see if I can better it) - but this you must correct, pronto. I've seen RPG sites extracting word-to-word faulty MÄR materials from Wiki (for which we as the editors should also take resposibility); and to me they look no less than zombies unawere of their undeadhood strolling around and infect people with their inaccurate conceptions. Also there's this thing bugging me - should we leave details of the Cross Guard death toll & their rise-and-fall in the Cross Guard section, or move them to this War page ? If we do, please draw out another outline for its headings - we have time of creation, rationale and leaders, but since the WG-related things are removed after those I'm helplessly unoriented.

- Second MÄR-Heaven war: my opinion is that it will include -

+ War campaign: I can only thank God I've jotted down the time details on the MÄR-Heaven page.

+ War Games: we can direct it to the War Game page and save ourselves hellish hours of writing. We've gotta make it long so the article won't join the line of candidates for deletion anway, so I think we may as well add the filler akts (Zonnen akt, Journey in Tokyo akt and Reginlief akt) into this section.

+ Phantom's death (yeah you heard me right it's not post-WG): two subsections - his manga ending and his anime ending. The anime ending will, of course, revolve around the Ghost Chess akt (just you don't delve into too much details in case you do it, we still have the character articles to fill remember).

+ King akt: another two-subsection section - manga and anime.

Well then what do you think ? Profet 666 03:31, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I answered the question you left on my editor review. DurinsBane87 03:54, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Artist Formerly Known As Whocares 15:03, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You deserve this.

		The Resilient Barnstar
		We might not get along together well, we might not agree with each other well, but you and I know that you definitely deserve this award for your constant improvement.--Hanaichi 11:08, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you just edit the parts I pointed out earlier so I can savor both it and your commend altogether ? Profet 666 07:02, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. Sorry for being inconsiderate. And I took out the Jake part so don't bother yourself with it anymore. Profet 666 09:39, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Which is his last name? I ask this because I would like to defaultsort and categorize the redirect in Category:YuYu Hakusho characters since

Thanks, hopefully WhisperToMe (who I also asked) will give the same response. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 20:03, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Great MÄR-Heaven Wars during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 23:29, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Your suggested changes

I've provided a set of responses. Great job on getting the ball moving. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 02:06, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Queen's image

[4] ..is the link to an image of our dear Diana the Queen of Kleptomaniacs, captured in one of her canopied moments. My account was blocked thanks to proxy-something #)!@()#*!#@(#*, I'm as of now incapacitated in any editorial actions unless I can guarantee they're carried out in the secure page but it, well, simply HAVEN'T enabled the Upload file tool *raises fists to sky*. So could you upload this pic for me ? You don't have to strain your brain for any blasted non-fair use rationale, just copy the whole thing from the unmasked Diana image.

Best regards,

P/S: Don't copy the whole thing. If my memories serve the other image is described to describe an unmasked woman. Profet 666 (talk) 13:33, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the topic you were referring to, the link doesn't work. Even if it did, I'd need to know where the image is from (episode, chapter), what it is of, where it should go, etc. before uploading it. ~SnapperTo 23:12, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

100 Scariest Movie Moments

Hi. Editorial lists such as this are copyrighted and posting the complete lists are a copyright violation. Cheers. The JPS^{talk to me} 18:33, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

T•@•C) 17:32, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Ahem, Ginta's page was 2/3rds plot. All I had simply done was removethe plot, and was about to center it more about personality and the character (rather than what he did) when I recieved this message. The Marchen Awakens Romance character pages are almost entirely plot, and we give more articles to normal characters than main characters who deserve it, and thus I decided to merge them. If you look at the merges, they can be put into 2-3 paragraphs and still have all the information the article listed in a shortened version. Artist Formerly Known As Whocares 17:37, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Horror Icons

the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Enter Movie 02:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Uncivil

Would you care to point out where I have been uncivil? I have shown why these fail policies, ignored fans per

WP:ATA. TTN (talk) 22:18, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Since I assume you're referring to TTN, I'll put this here. If you want to report someone you first need to give them the appropriate number/levels of

these is most appropriate. I will say that, though I haven't read the One Piece merger discussion, I've never seen TTN intentionally be uncivil to anyone who wasn't following him around Wikipedia. He might disregard your opinion for whatever reason, but he doesn't usually venture far from a "bad cop" attitude. ~SnapperTo 23:00, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Naruto

I have been working in the Naruto jutsu adding non-fictional info about jutsu. The article of IGN really helped me. Could you give me other pages containing info about naruto videogames or sth like that to keep adding? See you (offtopic: Merry christmas!) Tintor2 (talk) 11:15, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Editor Review

I've had this thing up since July and only have 3 reviews so can you please review me, good bad, I don't care, speak your mind. Please. Sam ov the blue sand, Editor Review 02:20, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, glad to see you're not mad over the whole itachi thing. I'll try to edit more articles.Sam ov the blue sand, Editor Review 21:50, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Greatest

On your user page, is number 1 on the villians list the one you think is the greatest?

Earthbendingmaster (talk) 04:02, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

I would have to have number 10 as number 1. I love Darth Sidious.

Earthbendingmaster (talk) 19:42, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Black Book Club

Another editor has added the "{{

prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 12:45, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Naruto (character)

I know you didn't quite like it before, but does it look better now? I did an edit to List of Naruto media too. Please reply on your talk page, I'll be watching it. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 07:48, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I plan on doing similar changes to other characters. We should talk about this first though. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 09:24, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay then. About you media article edit, my only concern was saying "action Figures". "Figurines" sounds like a much more adult term to use. I like what you did to Naruto's article. About Naruto, like Sasuke, a picture of him in a video game or a picture of one of his cards from the CCG series would be a nice addition. Both together might be a bit much, however, but hey, Pokemon did it, vso why shouldn't we? As for the plot summary, I'm completely satisfied with it as it currently is. I am concerned with the reception area, however, as it does look a bit empty (it might not be, but it appears that way), so we should try to find more to put there. Expanding the CCG would be nice, but not being much of a fan for CCG, I can't be much help here. Finallyonce this (and anything else that comes up) gets added, we have a review of the article, and mabye invite one of the members of the Anime and manga GA-deciding force (I forgot what exactly it was called ^_^ ) to give an opinion. Artist Formerly Known As Whocares (talk) 16:33, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About YuYu Hakusho characters

Just wondering if we should merge Yusuke, Kuwabara, Hiei, Genkai, and Kurama on to the list. Those crappy articles have existed for quite some time and they haven't been improved well. Or do you plan a major upgrade or something? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 21:49, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shichibukai merger

Thank you for taking the initiative to merge the Shichibukai article with The Three Great Powers. I was pretty sure I would be the only one supporting merges, so I appreciate the help. Ark (talk) 23:20, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bleach character cleanup

I've started a discussion over cleanup of the Bleach characters here. Comments would be appreciated. Cheers, Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 03:46, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Marpedia requests help

Any chance you can help this site by adding more pages of the characters? Rtkat3 (talk) 10:02, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rock Lee

I have been recreating the Rock Lee article here. I could get a lot of reception but I couldnt find conception information. If you have some conception info, could you add it? Thanks--Tintor2 (talk) 15:20, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you can use it. But why do you think Orochimaru will fail?Tintor2 (talk) 22:56, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Naruto characters revamp

See discussion here. Cheers, Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 07:43, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge complete. See discussion on stuff to do here. Cheers, Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 02:28, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suzuki or Suzuka?

Which is the official translated name of the YuYu Hakusho character? There is

Suzuki (YuYu Hakusho) and Suzuka (YuYu Hakusho)? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 16:21, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

My manga said Suzuki, although I'm completely fine with it either way. Artist Formerly Known As Whocares (talk) 20:34, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion

See discussion thread concerning merging

Akatsuki (Naruto) here. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 06:01, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Bleach cleanup

See this discussion. Cheers, Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 02:15, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy Template:Artist Formerly Known As Whocares

Greetings. Please move

subst}} with the appropriate syntax and parameters when using it in other namespaces. Thanks. --Thetrick (talk) 01:51, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Freinds

Im fourteen years old and is relatively new to wikipedia can you give me some pointers and talk to each other time eo time?

Grimmjow E6 (talk) 01:43, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

All the anime articles listed on my page as well as naruto among others......

Grimmjow E6 (talk) 19:32, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not

autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages

.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious

Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here

.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:53, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Anime and Manga Newsletter #1

Number 1, September 10, 2010

The Anime and Manga Newsletter

This is the monthly newsletter of

August 2010

Anime and Manga News

• August 9, 2010 - A fact from Black Rock Shooter appears on the main page.
• August 6, 2010 -
  Final Fantasy VII Advent Children undergoes a peer review
  .

• August 5, 2010 - A fact from List of Baccano! characters appears on the main page.
• August 4, 2010 - List of Digimon video games is promoted to featured list status.
• August 2, 2010 - Wandering Son is a good article nominee.

Requested articles
Articles that have been requested to be created can be found at

Anime and Manga and Seiyū

.

Articles that have been requested to be merged can be found at

Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga/Cleanup task force#Articles needing to be merged and Category:Anime and manga articles to be merged

.

Articles that have requests for images can be found at Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of anime and manga

Anime Premiered in August

• MonHun Nikki Girigiri Airū-mura Airū Kiki Ippatsu - 2010-08-05

Anime Premiering in September

• Battle Spirits: Brave - 2010-09-12
• Pocket Monsters: Best Wishes! - 2010-09-23
• MM! - 2010-09-26

Lists Requiring Help
These are lists that were demoted from featured list status and need improvement to become FL quality again.

• List of Fullmetal Alchemist episodes, see discussion
• List of The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya episodes, see discussion
• List of Planetes episodes, see discussion
• List of RahXephon media, see discussion

Articles Requiring Help

• .hack//Sign, see discussion
• Believers: Undersourced and contains original research
• The Big O, see discussion
• Bleach (manga), see discussion
• 
  discussion
• Death Note, see discussion
• Fate/stay night, see discussion: MoS violations, excessive plot, undersourced, excessive non-free images, missing pertinent info, need for copyedit
• Fist of the North Star, see discussion
• Elfen Lied, see discussion: Heavily under-sourced with original research, lacking neutrality, excessive plot, missing basic information, need for copyedit
• 
  discussion
• Golden Boy (manga), see discussion
• 
  discussion
• Jump Square, see discussion: Under-sourced, MoS violations, needs general copyedit.
• Loituma Girl, see discussion: Inadequate lead, under-sourced, need of general copyedit.
• Kirby (character), see discussion
• Planetes, see discussion: doesn't follow style, too much unsourced.
• Sailor Jupiter, Sailor Mars & Sailor Mercury, see discussion (all 3 are under the same discussion)
• Sailor Venus, see discussion: Needs copyediting and condensing prose.
• Suzuka (manga), see discussion
• X (manga), see discussion
• Yoshitaka Amano, see discussion: Insufficient referencing, prose problems, insufficient lead, MoS violations

Candidate Articles Requiring Help

These are well written articles that need improvement to become FA quality.

• Cowboy Bebop, see discussion
• InuYasha, see discussion
• Lupin III, see discussion
• Naruto, see discussion
• Strawberry Panic!, see discussion
• Twin Spica, see discussion

Featured articles The following articles reached

featured article

(FA) status and should be used as references for work on other articles in order to bring them up to FA level.

• Madlax
• School Rumble
• Shojo Beat
• Tokyo Mew Mew

Featured lists

• List of The Adventures of Mini-Goddess episodes
• List of Ah! My Goddess episodes (season 1)
• List of Asu no Yoichi! episodes
• List of Black Lagoon episodes
• List of Baccano! episodes
• List of Bleach chapters
• List of Bleach episodes
• List of Bleach episodes (season 1)
• List of Bleach episodes (season 2)
• List of Bleach episodes (season 3)
• List of Bleach episodes (season 4)
• List of Bleach episodes (season 5)
• List of Bleach episodes (season 6)
• List of Bleach episodes (season 7)
• List of Bleach episodes (season 8)
• List of Bleach episodes (season 9)
• List of Bleach episodes (season 10)
• List of Blue Drop: Tenshitachi no Gikyoku episodes
• List of Claymore chapters
• List of Claymore episodes
• List of D.Gray-man chapters
• List of D.Gray-man episodes
• List of Devil May Cry episodes
• List of Digimon video games
• List of Fate/stay night episodes
• List of FLCL episodes
• List of Fullmetal Alchemist chapters
• List of Gantz chapters
• List of Gunslinger Girl episodes
• List of Hitohira episodes
• List of Kashimashi: Girl Meets Girl episodes
• List of Kaze no Stigma episodes
• List of Kingdom Hearts media
• List of Last Exile episodes
• List of Lupin III Part II episodes
• List of Marmalade Boy chapters
• List of Myself ; Yourself episodes
• List of Naruto chapters (Part I)
• List of Naruto chapters (Part II)
• List of Naruto characters
• List of Naruto episodes (seasons 1–2)
• List of Naruto episodes (seasons 3–4)
• List of Naruto manga volumes
• List of Night Wizard episodes
• List of Oh My Goddess! episodes
• List of One Piece episodes (season 5)
• List of One Piece video games
• List of Popotan episodes
• List of Popotan soundtracks
• List of Rental Magica episodes
• List of Soul Eater chapters
• List of Tokyo Mew Mew chapters
• List of Tokyo Mew Mew characters
• List of Tokyo Mew Mew episodes
• List of Trinity Blood episodes
• List of True Tears episodes
• List of Tsukihime, Lunar Legend episodes
• List of Vampire Knight episodes
• List of Yotsuba&! chapters
• List of Yozakura Quartet episodes
• List of YuYu Hakusho episodes
• List of YuYu Hakusho episodes (season 1)
• List of YuYu Hakusho episodes (season 2)
• List of YuYu Hakusho episodes (season 3)
• List of YuYu Hakusho episodes (season 4)

MfD nomination of User:Artist Formerly Known As Whocares/Naruto Template Sandbox

sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Artist Formerly Known As Whocares/Naruto Template Sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 12:59, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

MÄR-Heaven is up for deletion on Wikipedia. I exported it all to the Manga wikia though

MÄR-Heaven is now at AFD. I did a full history export to http://manga.wikia.com/wiki/M%C3%84R-Heaven to preserve the content. Dream Focus 08:33, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Nomination of

Ninja World

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Ninja World is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ninja World until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 21:32, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of

Ginta Toramizu

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Ginta Toramizu, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted

.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ginta Toramizu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]