User talk:Axeman89

thanks for putting such nice information in the article about the Frigate Ertugrul. I am one of the team members working in the actual excavation project of the shipwreck and I wanted to ask you about the information you have gathered about the accident. I do not seem to have the original sources for the description in English and I would really appreciate if you let me know where to get them. I'll appreciate your help, [email protected] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bertalledo (talk • contribs) 10:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You added a contradict box to the NVI F.K.31 article. Could you point out what is contradictory there? --MoRsE (talk) 06:10, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've been a subscriber for years too and remember many controversial covers . . . . though the only one that jumped to mind was the gay sailors kissing. I know there have been others.

I don't know that any have ever been this controversial and time will tell how big of a cover this really is.--Utahredrock (talk) 08:18, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted [this edit] as you had wiped out the ref tag. I am sure it was accidental. Just wanted to mention that. :) Thanks. Recordfreenow (talk) 03:14, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, it was indeed accidental. Thanks for letting me know! Axeman89 (talk)

My talk is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas

, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{

subst:User:Flaming/MC2008

}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

--

Ah, I assumed you were using a program, but that you were manually making the changes yourself. Axeman89 (talk) 08:14, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, but I do choose which edits to revert, and blatant vandalism is usually pretty obvious so it can be reverted immediately. --NellieBly (talk) 08:32, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:57, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Vz. 58. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the articles. Thank you. ROG5728 (talk) 22:41, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Source added, right next to the picture of the Slovak soldier holding an Vz. 58 while standing beneath the Slovakian seal. Axeman89 (talk) 23:52, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you put a contradict flag on the NVI F.K.31 article. I can't see any contradictions in it, so I have removed the tag. If I've missed the contradiction, please feel free to put the tag back, and leave a note on the talk page to expalin what the contradiction is. Cheers -- WORMMЯOW  12:05, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the edit. I have no idea why I put in the contradiction tag, especially since I don't seem to have mentioned it on the talk page. Perhaps I found it peculiar that the tiny, poor Finnish Air Force of the 1920s would purchase and fly 12 planes for a mere 6 total hours? Axeman89 (talk) 21:35, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed that you don't use

RASAM (talk) 13:58, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that this was a typo. I've reverted it, since it's not clear what your intent was. Regards, Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 05:58, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's partially a typo. Referring to “the WWII conflicts” seemed a bit redundant, so I removed that part, but seem to have also accidentally removed the word “from.” If you agree with my change, you can make it, but with the word “from,” included this time, otherwise feel free to leave it alone. I'll leave the change to you. Axeman89 (talk) 15:55, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense. I've now made the adjustment. Regards, Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 17:41, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited RFB Fantrainer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page F4 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ludvig Puusepp, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ventriculography (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Outgassing may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• temperature vulcanization|RTV]] sealants outgas the poison [[cyanide]] for weeks after application.{{Citation needed|reason=this is a strong claim which can't be included here without proper

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barotrauma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rockfish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joseph Bailey (general), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wisconsin Dells. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Lisbon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:30, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

Hello, Axeman89. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are an accomplished editor, so perhaps I am missing something related to your recent edit of this article. I found the text here, which may suggest it came from a source now in public domain, but I don't see that you used quotes or a blockquote or identified the source.S Philbrick(Talk) 12:12, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up. I was just copying this section, although I apparently didn't bother to seek out its source. It just seems strange that the one thing missing from the Orisini Affair article is the assassination at the center--the article simply goes from background to the arrest, with no description of the act itself. Axeman89 (talk) 12:14, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Axeman89. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:14, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Axeman89. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Axeman89. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the

guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Cabayi (talk) 15:40, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eleonore Prochaska, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dannenberg.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Bailén, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cabrera.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bracteate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George Kennan (explorer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Koryak.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see

Hello! Voting in the

2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply

]