User talk:Badehmasare

This is Badehmasare's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Your submission at Articles for creation: Provence Honey has been accepted

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation

if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 19:15, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Juan Carlos Reyna (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by L293D was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is not bad, just not well supported by

reliable sources

in English. You are welcome to notify me on my that page when this issue is fixed so I can review your draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Juan Carlos Reyna and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

L293D (☎ • ✎) 13:01, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Charbelfakhoury! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! L293D (☎ • ✎) 13:01, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Austrian Economics Master URJC (February 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by L293D was:

This submission appears to

independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability

of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Austrian Economics Master URJC and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

L293D (☎ • ✎) 16:01, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at

Basic Attention Token

has been accepted

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation

if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Dial911 (talk) 21:54, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at

1896–1897 Greek Macedonian rebellion

has been accepted

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation

if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 09:12, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Local service delivery has been accepted

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation

if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 12:48, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your AfD submission

Draft:NMS Rechinul

Hi Charbelfakhoury, I have removed your nomination for deletion on

Articles for Deletion is reserved for mainspace articles. Drafts are nominated at WP:Miscellany for deletion. Please follow the instructions there and complete your nomination with appropriate reasons if you still want the draft deleted. Thanks, MT Train^Talk 18:00, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nowhera Shaik has been accepted

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation

if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:42, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tolani Fatilewa has been accepted

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation

if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 00:29, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at

Constructive Development (biology)

has been accepted

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation

if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Ravenswing 05:49, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eric Geyer (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MadeYourReadThis was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published,

notable

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

lacks significant coverage in multiple 3rd party reliable sources demonstrating roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. Does not meet

WP:NACTOR

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eric Geyer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MadeYourReadThis (talk) 15:06, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to join WikiProject Dinosaurs

Hi Charbelfakhoury,

Welcome! You are receiving this message because we've noticed your great edits related to our project WikiProject Dinosaurs!. We are a group of editors working on improving articles in the scope of this project, and we need your help to meet the project goals. Please come over to our project page to take a look!

• You will see a list of articles that need most improvement .
• You will find a group of editors who share similar interest with you.
• Overall, this is a friendly place to discuss any issues related to Dinosaurs, ask questions, and collaborate on improving articles on Dinosaurs!

Feel free to put your name on the project member list. Hope you will have fun here, let us know if you need any help! Bobo.03 (talk) 19:50, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page comments

Hello, Charbelfakhoury. Your recent additions [1] [2] to user talk pages appear to be incomprehensible non-English. What is the purpose or your intent with these? — CactusWriter ^(talk) 17:15, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

talk) 20:27, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

On the english wikipedia, we communicate in english. I have no idea what you are trying to communicate here, or here. SQL^{Query me!} 19:22, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@CactusWriter: @SQL: Fwiw, it's this not that the translations bring any more light to it. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 19:42, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

lol kissaker (

talk) 20:12, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

July 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article
  article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards
  .
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. The persistent addition of indecipherable non-English comments (despite requests for explanation and your refusal to comply) is considered disruptive. I suggest that you review Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 22:11, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

tayeb moss w ntk ya mstl. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.135.80.213 (talk) 05:35, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So, if you are unable, or are unwilling to communicate in english - you will very likely end up blocked indefinitely. SQL^{Query me!} 05:46, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

who? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.135.80.213 (talk) 06:26, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@

talk) 09:16, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

WP:NPA. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:14, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

talk) 18:17, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User:Chrissymad. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 18:24, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

talk

) 18:26, 17 July 2018 (UTC) @

talk) 13:03, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

July 2018 - blocked

💖 21:44, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Badehmasare (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

User:Drewmutt said that I attacked User:Chrissymad personally even though I didn't and asked him to clarify where I attacked her and refused to answer me. So I shouldn't be bocked.

Decline reason:

You called another user a racist above. You will need to address this if you choose to make another unblock request. I am declining this request. 331dot (talk) 09:33, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{unblock | reason= @331dot: Yeah and that was wrong to say but after that I got a warning that if I make ANOTHER personal attack I will be blocked, and I didn't.}

• If you are just addressing me, your comment should not be an unblock request. If you choose to make another request, it will be reviewed by someone else. You did not seem to recognize that you had made a personal attack, as you asked "Can you explain to me where I attacked her?". That would suggest that the behavior would continue. I also think that if you make another unblock request you should address your non-English postings. This is the English Wikipedia, communication in English that others can understand is mandatory. If English is not your primary language, there is likely a version of Wikipedia in a language that you are more comfortable with. 331dot (talk) 09:46, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@

talk) 09:51, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Badehmasare (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

After I called a user racist I got a warning that I shouldn't personally attack users so I didn't attack anyone again but I got blocked regardless.

Decline reason:

This does not address the concerns above. Yamla (talk) 11:01, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@331dot: For the record, the block wasn't just for the talk page nonsense where he called SQL a racist but the content which he was adding elsewhere which was the equivalent of something....very nasty in several places (I asked a native arab speaker to translate.) CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 10:44, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

is open. If this request is acceptable, and if we can unblock, user can them request unlocking. Pinging stakeholders. I will copy this below for your consideration.

@TheresNoTime, CactusWriter, 331dot, and SQL:

--Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:27, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: I've left a comment at the relevant UTRS. While I am inclined to assume good faith here, that the user has matured over the last four years, I'm also concerned about this account being globally locked as an LTA, and if that's something we'd need to overcome first? SQL^{Query Me!} 05:39, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking about that last evening during my walk. There may be more here than we have seen, Will ask. Badehmasare, if you are some ' LTA, I'll find out eventually. 😜 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:14, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User has been unlocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:37, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

restore TPA --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:57, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When I return, I will write up an unblock request and present it at

WP:AN. I just need to write a preamble. You already did the hard part. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:31, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Badehmasare: Let me ask you this directly, here. @RoySmith has found technical evidence (presumably from site logs) that they have mentioned here, that you have another account, Cookiefinger. Do you have an explanation for this? SQL^{Query Me!} 03:34, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I created it after I was blocked but I made contributions to it. wikipedian (talk) 07:04, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I want to stop using the other account and use this one that is why I appeales the block and lock. wikipedian (talk) 07:07, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What should I do now?

You might want to withdraw before there is a pile on of declines.

Don't edit or sock for six months and try again. You need to deal with the block evasion at that time. The unblock request per se was pretty good. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:15, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Okay thank you wikipedian (talk) 12:39, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure. reveiwing and composing. I type slow --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:59, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Posted. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:40, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mooted. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:19, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Badehmasare. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- RoySmith (talk) 12:20, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]