User talk:BcRIPster

January 2007 – December 2007

January 2008 – November 2009

December 2009 – April 2014

Hi BcRIPster, I feel bad that nobody has answered you at WP:VG/RS. I've been quite busy myself and I don't think there's consensus sufficient for including the magazine in the RS section yet, but your suggestion has given me the idea to go through and make a proper research of the older magazines I have with an eye toward determining which of the oldest online sources were notable and reliable back in the 90s and early 2000s. As I said in talk at VG/RS, I know there is coverage of old internet websites and hopefully it should produce some interesting topics to expand the video game journalism article. Anyway I just wanted to let you know that I anticipate this project will take me quite a while but I'll be keeping an eye out for mentions of Game Zero and I'll let you know if I run across anything in print. -Thibbs (talk) 01:30, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I know a lot of older paper magazines around the dawn of the internet liked to have a 1-2 page section covering what was "hot" online

Reference link to the related archived conversation for context. BcRIPster (talk) 00:10, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

Hi Frεcklεfσσt! Thanks for reaching out. Yes, I've seen you around as well... you're quite the prolific editor. :) Unfortunately I never seem to have the time to be as active as I would like so I tend to only gravitate around a handful of pages where I feel that I can help make the best contribution with my time and perspective. But it's all good. Thanks again and cheers! BcRIPster (talk) 20:32, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BcRIPster, I have been thinking about what you said back in January of last year, and I wondered if you were aware of Wikipedia:WikiProject Websites/Early web history task force. Sadly the group seems to have gone defunct, but you might be able to contact some of the (former) participants still there to help you locate coverage of Game Zero that would allow it to be documented as part of the early history of the web. I am chronically short of time these days, but I still do intend to make an exhaustive search of the physical paper-based gaming magazines to see if I can find anything, and I'll definitely let you know if I find coverage. -Thibbs (talk) 13:50, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Template_talk:PD-US-patent#Now_we_need_another_template,_or_a_parameter,_to_indicate_lack_of_copyright_verified. —Catsquisher (talk) 19:55, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please see Template_talk:PD-US-patent-no_notice. —Catsquisher (talk) 20:09, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Video game lists by franchise has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 12:17, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 14, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2023
Previous issue | Index

Project At a Glance
As of Q4

2022

, the project has:

259 Featured Articles 95 Featured Lists 10 Featured Topics

35 Featured Pictures 1,862 Good Articles 31 Good Topics

---

Content

Changes to Featured and Good content News items and announcements

Survey: How does WikiProject Video games determine character notability? Some news regarding the status of the newsletter

---

Project Navigation

• VG Project Main pages

  • Main project – talk
  • Project category – talk
  • Portal – talk

  VG Project Departments

  • talk
  • Cleanup – talk
  • Peer review – talk

   

  • Reference library – talk
  • Newsletter – talk
  • talk

To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to update the distribution list.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:40, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Video game gameplay has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 23:59, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]