User talk:Bitwits

Hello, Bitwits, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:49, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bitwits, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double
  inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners
  , for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is
  Wikipedia:Copy-paste
  .
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tracy Von Doom (talk) 19:33, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Shei Je Holud Pakhi, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See
  Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations
  for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See
  section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
  .

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. LuciferEdits (talk) 13:11, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam-2727 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Try looking for reviews of the film online. Since this is a webseries, it isn't presumed notable, so you should find sources that indicate its notability (usually found through reviews of the film).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MisMatch and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:MisMatch, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sam-2727 (talk) 00:36, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bitwits! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sam-2727 (talk) 00:36, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

বাংলা উইকিতে অবদান রাখার আহবান জানাচ্ছি। দুঃখেত বিষয় বাংলা উইকিতে অবদান রাখার মত লোকজন না থাকায় বাংলা উইকিতেই বাংলা নাটক/চলচ্চিত্র নিয়ে তেমন লেখা হয় না। আপনি এখানে যা লিখেন তাই বাংলায় লিখতে পারেন। আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 15:28, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bonyo Premer Golpo, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonyo Premer Golpo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Synthetic Sati, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Synthetic Sati until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kamini (web series), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamini (web series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello bro plz maintain discipline Thewonderboy2001 (talk) 10:37, 4 March 2021 (UTC) Hey Bro Can you please let me know what kind of rules that I have broken?[reply]

Hello, Bitwits. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:53, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pabitra Puppies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pabitra Puppies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Dixiku (talk) 23:40, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Hello Bitwits. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Bitwits. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Bitwits|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 2402:3A80:6DD:A6DC:C10B:FE33:C382:DFB8 (talk) 18:15, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Its clear you are being paid or have a conflict-of-Interest in creating, promoting and editing Shree Venkatesh Films related works and associated artists as a part of Shree Venkatesh Films's Talent Management. 2402:3A80:6DD:A6DC:C10B:FE33:C382:DFB8 (talk) 18:15, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Bitwits, there are a huge number of sources that talk about the company - see Google scholar, Google books, and Google news. There are many ways to build up an article - one is to go through sources, one by one, adding useful stuff from the source into the article. In some cases, the right thing to do is to complete a citation template for a source, and put it in a sandbox with a few notes about what the source is useful for.

I built a new article called Haren Prison in January. If you look at the edit history you can see how I built up the article in little steps.-- Toddy1 (talk) 14:14, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I added to the article on Nicole Parks in response to an AFD. It was the same process - see edit history - find a relevant source - add information from it to the article - find another relevant source, etc.-- Toddy1 (talk) 14:20, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What the article should look like.

Hoichoi is company that transmits films and television programmes to people. Have a look at the articles on other companies that also do this, for example: RTÉ. Notice that it does not list all the films and TV programmes RTÉ are showing. This old version of the article on Hoichoi has gigantic tables with the films and TV programmes Hoichoi are showing. Can you understand why the tables got deleted?-- Toddy1 (talk) 15:28, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The big table

The big table the effect of the dts template

The big table, discussion

Two editors have removed the big table from the article on Hoichoi on the grounds that it is uncited. In practical terms, that means that it should not go back unless each line of the table has a citation. One way to do that would be to have a footnotes column. Sortable tables are often messed up by having footnotes in the sortable cells.

With respect of dates, there is a template for dates that makes them look right whilst being sortable: {{dts|2 July 1959}} produces 2 July 1959. You can see an example of a table using that feature at

I put the dts template in the first of the big tables above.-- Toddy1 (talk) 16:46, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for making this changes. Also can you add some details on the deletion discussion page so it won't get deleted. Bitwits (talk) 16:52, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Toddy, I request you to add relevant details on hoichoi wikipedia page to increase the notability of the platform so it won't get deleted. Also I request you if you can help me to bring the content table for the same page. 43.231.243.126 (talk) 16:49, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Toddy, I request you to add relevant details on hoichoi wikipedia page to increase the notability of the platform so it won't get deleted. Also I request you if you can help me to bring the content table for the same page. Bitwits (talk) 16:50, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I already commented on the deletion discussion page on 11 and 14 March 2023. Commenting a third time will carry no weight.

If the article is deleted, the answer is to rebuild the article as Draft:Hoichoi basing it on what reliable sources say. It would be a lot of work going through the many sources that talk about the company. The table belongs in a daughter-article. But of course, they need citations for every line.-- Toddy1 (talk) 16:59, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bitwits! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Hoichoi that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 12:24, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Toddy, I am just trying to resolve the current errors to remove the consideration of page deletion. It is my request to you if you you can make some necessary changes to Hoichoi page to increase the overall score of the page. I am also trying to get some genuine and reliable source to get back the published content list. Bitwits (talk) 12:58, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So you think that deleting citations to reliable independent sources will help - well it will help the case for deleting the article.-- Toddy1 (talk) 15:17, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]