User talk:Bob the ducq

As they say in the movies, "oh be-have". Seriously, though, we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so don't make joke edits. Some readers looking for a serious article might not find them amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do a bit seriously here. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write whatever you want (as long as it's not offensive).

Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 15:48, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That was a serious article! Finola Hackett is a real person who studies French in Alberta, came in second in the 2006 Scripps National Spelling Bee to Catherine Close after misspelling the German word Weltschmerz, plays the piano, and sings. I'm not making a joke, I'm trying to give the general public information.

Uh, yeah, um, uh, Finola Hackett is an amazing speller, but why is this on the bob the ducq discussion?

Because shut up.

Sorry, I couldn't pass up that opportunity. For real though, because Bob the Ducq created the article, and then some wise-guy moderator thought it was a joke and deleted it. Shows how much Wikipedia cares about our younger generation's spelling abilities.

Hi,

MediaWiki provides lots of ways to avoid using HTML. For paragraphs, simply put a blank line between them; no HTML markup is needed. It makes it easier for future editors! --Rschmertz 00:34, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, sorry. I'll try and remember to avoid using HTML.

Thanks for uploading

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:05, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

You contributed Image:SPEEDLIMIT2535.JPG and I was curious as to where it was taken. Thank you. Marc Kupper (talk) (contribs) 04:05, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's somewhere in New Albany, Indiana--I'm not sure what the name of the street is. Bob the ducq (talk) 02:19, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gengelbert Humperdinck. Since you had some involvement with the Gengelbert Humperdinck redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:50, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Gengelbert Humperdinck, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bridgeplayer (talk) 19:01, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit

]

File permission problem with File:DeckardEternalVigilance.png

Thanks for uploading File:DeckardEternalVigilance.png, which you've sourced to John Silk Deckard.. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  OTRS pending
  }} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at

non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags

for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 21:12, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Deckard Eternal Vigilance.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Deckard Eternal Vigilance.jpg, which you've sourced to John Silk Deckard.. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  OTRS pending
  }} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at

non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags

for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 21:12, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE: Freedom to photograph sculptures in the USA only applies to those installed before 1978 - see commons:commons:Freedom_of_panorama#United_States  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 21:15, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Spikeball

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on

section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify

their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. ZappyLongNose (talk) 01:15, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

He got off a little while ago listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect He got off a little while ago. Since you had some involvement with the He got off a little while ago redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:25, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]