User talk:Brankestein/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Brankestein. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive for discussions between 2014 and 2018.

You are invited to join invite to join the WikiProject Latin music, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and languages of Ibero-America. Simply click here to accept! Or, if you're interested in reading more on Latin music, you may want to check out the Latin music portal.

Erick (talk) 21:14, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi Brankestein. Just wanted to check in with you about this edit. Yes, I know in Spanish the diacritics on the words are needed, but in usage for the name of the group? All of the sources I can find, as well as self-references (such as [1]) leave this off. I just was wondering what rationale you had for making that edit. Spencer^T♦C 20:59, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Metacritic game rankings (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to SCEA, Rare and N-Gage

Metacritic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to SCEA

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Metacritic game rankings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metacritic game rankings until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Soetermans. T / C 07:07, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Impacto, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fergie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daddy Yankee discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Send Me An Angel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daddy Yankee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Send Me An Angel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:47, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to El Cartel II may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | single 3 = [igga What What <small>([[MC Ceja]])</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eliel (producer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sampler. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wise (composer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Bad Boy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

14F

added a link pointing to Maluma

Love and Sex (Plan B album)

added a link pointing to

Es Un Secreto

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Last Don 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reflection. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vico C, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Producer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

File permission problem with File:14Falbumcover.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:14Falbumcover.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  OTRS pending
  }} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Terrence C. Carson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kratos. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daddy Yankee discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Worldwide. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dangerous (Yandel album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neve. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Babilla (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santurce. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yandel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maluma. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Brankestein. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi, creo que hablas español, y mi inglés, no es muy bueno, sólo te dejo este artículo de la nueva política de certificación que maneja PROMUSICAE. Así las cosas, yo estaba en lo cierto en mi edición.

)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Just wanted to let you know that your contributions to Latin-music related articles have not gone unnoticed and you've been doing an outstanding job! —Fundude99talk to me 05:07, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! That's really cool! --Brankestein (talk) 18:51, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. 220 of ^Borg 03:40, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of awards and nominations received by Yandel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Los Extraterrestres. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi,

Your request for assessment, I`m afraid, is out of the music albums hands, since the article is already a B, the highest rating we can provide, you should ask for a GA nomination.

Regards. Zidane tribal (talk) 18:01, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jowell & Randy discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Loco. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tbhotch -- Tbhotch (talk) 08:21, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

WP:Good Article status, unfortunately, has failed as it needs a lot of work. Please see the review page

The article Despacito you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Despacito for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tbhotch -- Tbhotch (talk) 21:01, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Train2104 (t • c) 15:19, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Hey Brankestein, as you are the main contributor to Despacito, you must have seen that the user Iknow23 disputed that the original and remix versions are being counted as one. I think Billboard has made it quite clear thus far with their two articles ([2] and [3]) that they are being counted as one, considering it was noted as having moved up the chart from "48–9" when Bieber was not credited last week. As I have said to them, the original version is still selling and its sales are merely being combined with the remix from this week on. Billboard's articles have also just said the remix has "helped" it make the top 10, not that the remix alone has achieved this. If you disagree, can you please make it clear to them that you do as well/revert as you see fit? I really hope they don't start an edit war over it, but surely if more than one editor disagrees with them, especially you, as the user who has contributed the most to the article, it helps the case. Thanks. Ss112 04:31, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

@Ss112: I agree with you. You want to delete the Billboard Hot 100 No. 9 peak of the Remix version section? Brankestein (talk) 04:43, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

I'm not sure we should delete that, as Billboard has combined both unlike other countries' charts that have just credited the original "Despacito" (while only a few have credited "Despacito (Remix)", like Sweden). I'm assuming when Billboard updates its charts later, they will credit Bieber's version in the top 10, whereas prior to this week it just said "Luis Fonsi and Daddy Yankee", and their article has made it clear they are combining the remix's chart history with that of the original version (as the No. 9 peak won't be credited as a new entry, but will say it has moved up from 48), so it makes sense to have it in both to me. Ss112 04:49, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Okay, I will make it clear if this happens again. Brankestein (talk) 04:56, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Despacito, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spanish guitar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for all your work on Despacito. On the Despacito updated view count table, I have a few concerns to discuss with you.

a) I don't think it is clear that the ranking means "Fastest to each milestone".

b) I think that the "peak" ranking is less informative to a reader than the current ranking. The source also refers to current ranking, so the peak ranking is unsourced.

c) In the same vein, I don't think that the "Displaced by" column is significant, it is also unsourced, and it is also not really expandable if more videos displace it (or if one Spanish-language video and one overall music video displace it). So I would get rid of this.

It may be that the table I made yesterday wasn't the best way of fixing these issues but it might be a good starting point - I am going away for a few days, and so if you agree, please fix it in your preferred way.

Tcamfield (talk) 07:18, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi Brankestein. You may like to chime in at User talk:Ss112#"Despacito" Are you thinking what I'm thinking?. If so, please keep all discussion there in one place. Thank you. —Iknow23 (talk) 09:46, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

The discussion is no longer at my talk page because it affects more than just me, and I don't like extended discussions being held at my talk page. I have requested it be opened at Talk:Despacito, if anything. Ss112 10:51, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barrio Fino, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puerto Rican. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Hey, I was thinking of writing something about it, but then I was thinking you'd probably like to kinda restructure the chart performance section on Despacito now that it's reached number one on the Hot 100? Ss112 18:44, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Feel free to write what you have in mind. We will see if the section needs to be restructured. Brankestein (talk) 19:19, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

I've added a bit, but I'm still not sure if that is noticeable enough or worded as well as it could be. I think reaching number 1 on the Hot 100 is one of its most notable achievements thus far, so it should definitely be/stay in the first paragraph somewhere. Ss112

I don't think there's much more information to add. We should wait some time if the song has consecutive weeks at number one on the Hot 100 or something else, like a record of some kind. Brankestein (talk) 20:48, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! :) Brankestein (talk) 23:44, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi

Good Articles: Music needs the help of willing reviewers!

Hi there. You nominated an article for evaluation against the good article criteria some time ago, but I noticed you have yet to review an article yourself. Although it's not mandatory, it would be helpful if every user who creates a nomination also reviewed at least one other article, as this would help clear the massive backlog. Reviewing someone else's article can also help you in the long run: every article reviewed brings yours one position closer to the top of the nominations list! If you worked on the article you nominated, chances are you're already familiar with the six good article criteria. It really isn't hard to review, and may take an experienced editor only a few hours to complete. If you have the time and would like to help, please click here, take a moment to figure out which article you'd like to review, then click on its (start review) button. Thank you for reading, and if you need assistance with your review at any point, please feel free to leave a message on my talk page and I'll respond to you as soon as I can. Homeostasis07 (talk)

Not that I particularly care about your removal of the column, but what do you mean with this edit summary? Ireland and the UK are two separate countries and two separate charts. While it's true that the Official Charts Company has recently taken up helping to publish the Irish charts, we don't exclude Ireland solely based on the fact that an album or artist charted in the UK as well. That may apply to Scotland. Ss112 21:55, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

My bad, I thought that Ireland was part of the UK. What a foolish mistake... Thanks for letting me know. Brankestein (talk) 23:11, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Daddy Yankee Puerto Rico Star.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 23:40, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

@Train2104: The other image is non-free and I already requested its deletion. Brankestein (talk) 01:09, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in

section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Despacito Remix by Luis Fonsi.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in

section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Barrio Fino

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Barrio Fino has been completed.

In the Composition section I added a "clarification needed" tag to this section as I was unsure exactly what the last part meant.

"Corazones" is a social rap that focuses on how every person, represented by hearts, "is different and feels different things".[13] Daddy Yankee wrote the lyrics because he believes that the mass media focuses more on reporting negative news, entailing him to take notice about the needs of poor neighborhoods.[13][18]

Other than that I think the article is in great shape.

Good luck with your GA nimination.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:20, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Daddy Yankee Orchestra.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Daddy Yankee Orchestra.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 16:02, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

How could this image be replaceable by a freely-licensed equivalent file if it is a screenshot of a copyrighted music video? Brankestein (talk) 22:40, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Despacito

How do you know??? Johnnyboytoy (talk) 23:09, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

How do I know... what? Brankestein (talk) 03:24, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

oops man! nice work....

Just checked the page views on Despacito, its amazing. Nice work creating the article man. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.112.32.118 (talk) 02:21, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Daddy Yankee (discography)

I would like to let you know that I understand why you reverted my edit, adding the Havana (Remix) track. However, if you ever decide to add it onto the page, make sure to add it to the lead artist subsection, not the featured artist subsection, as he owns the track along with Camila Cabello.

Every875 (talk) 22:29, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi! Every performer involved in a track, lead or guest, owns it for songwriting credits, and I'm surprised that Daddy Yankee isn't credited as a feature artist following the original song (which is credited as Camila Cabello featuring Young Thug). Anyway, I don't think that the song needs to be on the list for the moment, since it's a remix version that didn't manage to rank separately on any chart (yet). The table would be unnecessary long if we add every single remix version that featured Daddy Yankee... Brankestein (talk) 22:37, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Update: It looks like the track has just charted! Maybe now is a good time to add it to

Every875 (talk) 22:39, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi! Sorry but iTunes' charts are deprecated in Wikipedia: "Charts pertaining to only one specific retailer should not be used." Brankestein (talk) 01:24, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

At long last it has charted! I do not mean to be annoying but

Every875 (talk) 21:19, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

The Camila Cabello's discography page shows the remix of "Havana" on the Other charted songs section, so it should be correct to do the same on Daddy Yankee's discography. Brankestein (talk) 01:45, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Brankestein. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Billboard Latin Music Award for Hot Latin Songs Artist of the Year) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Billboard Latin Music Award for Hot Latin Songs Artist of the Year, Brankestein!

Wikipedia editor Babymissfortune just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for taking the time creating this page - nice job!

To reply, leave a comment on Babymissfortune's

talk page

.

Learn more about

page curation

.

Merry Christmas!

missfortune 01:56, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Despacito year-end charts

Hey, I don't know if it was you who added all the year-end charts to

WP:OVERLINK. Ss112 07:48, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, it was me. EDIT: Just to know, in future years, if "Despacito" appears on the year-end chart of Digital Songs (e.g.) without ranking on the Hot 100, could it be on the year-end column of that year? Brankestein (talk) 16:01, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject

.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Despacito Diamond RIAA.jpg

Thank you for uploading

image copyright tag

; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with

section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. ℯxplicit 02:11, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Despacito Grammy Awards.jpg

Thank you for uploading

image copyright tag

; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with

section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. ℯxplicit 02:11, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Barrio Fino

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Basilisk4u -- Basilisk4u (talk) 05:20, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Barrio Fino

The article

good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Barrio Fino for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Basilisk4u -- Basilisk4u (talk) 21:20, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Barrio Fino

The article Barrio Fino you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Barrio Fino for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Basilisk4u -- Basilisk4u (talk) 22:21, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

GA barnstar

		The Good Article Barnstar
		In recognition of your first good article, Barrio Fino, I proudly present this barnstar to you! Erick (talk) 20:41, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

BTW, did you know that the article for Barrio Fino is also now eligible for a DYK nomination? If you successfully nominate the article for a DYK, it will appear on the front page of Wikipedia. Erick (talk) 20:41, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you! I could try to nominate the article for a DYK. Brankestein (talk) 02:00, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 in Latin music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jason Boyd (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

"Rock Is Dead (Marilyn Manson song)"

Hi! I know you love music and I was wondering if you might like to review the (brief) article for "Rock Is Dead (Marilyn Manson song)"?--MagicatthemovieS MagicatthemovieS (talk) 17:12, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

I changed "Rock Is Dead (Marilyn Manson song)"

I addressed all of your concerns regarding the Marilyn Manson article. Thanks for your help!--MagicatthemovieS

"Rock Is Dead (Marilyn Manson song)"

Are you wiling to pass the article and allow it to receive GA status?--MagicatthemovieS

Your GA nomination of Despacito

The article Despacito you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Despacito for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Fhsig13 -- Fhsig13 (talk) 05:01, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Elton John

We worked so well together on the "Rock Is Dead" article, I was wondering if you would review the Elton John article when I nominate it for GA.MagicatthemovieS (talk) 03:53, 11 November 2018 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Brankestein. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)