User talk:Brosenow

Hello, I'm GiantSnowman. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Reece James (footballer, born 1999) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. GiantSnowman 09:19, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. When trying to add a new section such as an awards section how did I do that

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. Welcome to Wikipedia! I just wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions was not quite right. When updating statistics within the infobox of a footballer, please make sure you update the timestamp at the same time, so that both readers and fellow editors know when the information was last updated.

You can do this by replacing the existing timestamp within the |club-update= or |pcupdate= parameter for club stats, or the |nationalteam-update= or |ntupdate= parameter for international stats, by adding five tildes (~~~~~), which generates the specific time the update was made.

If you have any questions about this, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you, Mattythewhite (talk) 12:28, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Richard Jefferson, you may be blocked from editing. —Bagumba (talk) 04:43, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what your point is, but you had better stop. Favonian (talk) 19:18, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just trying to get some blocks off my page. A lot of them are for no reason.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Brosenow (talk • contribs)

You are not blocked. These are not blocks, these are warnings. You can remove them any time you want.--SharabSalam (talk) 20:05, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Edgar181. Favonian (talk) 19:20, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Brosenow (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I think I understand what I did wrong. I thought those were my blocks. I was mistaken now that I read into it more. Please unblock my page

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲_水 08:27, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You received plenty of warnings. I don't understand what could possibly lead you to believe you were blocked and that placing an unblock request on someone else's page was the way to go about getting unblocked. Comments like this show perhaps

I understand that now. It was a mistake and I messed up. Please unblock me. I have an Edits I’d like to complete regarding the NBA G League Drfat. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brosenow (talk • contribs)

"I have an Edits I’d like to complete regarding the NBA G League Drfat." I'm tempted to extend the block indefinitely. --Yamla (talk) 00:21, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I accidentally messed up Vitto Brown page and I need help fixing it Brosenow (talk) 22:01, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Brosenow, I have noticed you have repeatedly linked to

Does anyone have a template to help create a wiki page? Specifically for an athlete Brosenow (talk) 04:33, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I need help finishing Malik Taylor’s infobox I started. Can’t get it into right format Brosenow (talk) 01:48, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

I could use some help with my references format. Trying to fix error Brosenow (talk) 02:09, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How do I move a page into the drafts? I need to move Curtis Bolton knot drafts Brosenow (talk) 17:36, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind Brosenow (talk) 18:54, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Brosenow! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 04:18, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article

reliable source

that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

Thank you for creating Delontae Scott.

Doesn't meet

WP:GNG

.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willsome429}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 23:39, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Brosenow,

Thank you for creating Zack Johnson (American football).

Doesn't meet

WP:GNG

.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willsome429}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 23:41, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

He was a three time FCS champ. I thought that would meet the guidelines Brosenow (talk) 00:42, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, what work do you consider it needing to be published Brosenow (talk) 00:47, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late reply. Page Curation messages are automatic, so I don't wind up watching talk pages. If you ever need to ask a reviewer a question again, please use the {{re|username}} code so they get a ping. You're not the first to think that being an FCS champ is enough, and I'm sure you won't be the last. The tricky part about that is that the backup punter is also technically an FCS champion while he contributed almost nothing to the team.

routine coverage, so right now the Yahoo one is the only one that demonstrates notability. Three or four more of those type of sources and he should meet GNG. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 00:32, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

thank you so much for the help Brosenow (talk) 03:12, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Willsome429: last question. Does being a two time FCS all American count or is that similar to the national champ situation Brosenow (talk) 03:18, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No. Since FCS is a lower level of competition, it’s not regarded as a notable honor. However, if a player wins one of the awards listed in the “Division 1 FCS” section of

WP:NCOLLATH. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 14:02, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

@Willsime429: alright I should probably put it in drafts Incase he makes the team. How do I do that? Brosenow (talk) 16:03, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moving to drafts is reserved for New Page Patrollers in most cases. I can do that for you real quick so you can develop it further. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 23:02, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Willsome429: can you do the same for Delontae Scott Brosenow (talk) 00:08, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Hi Brosenow, Good day. Pls note that a mixed martial arts fighter needs to have at least 3 fights under tier one promotor (UFC or Invicta) to meet the

talk) 01:15, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Alright I will. I submitted it before I read this my apologies Brosenow (talk) 01:39, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Would his Bellator fight count as one? Brosenow (talk) 01:41, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Brosenow, Bellator Fighting Championships is one of the top tier from 2009 to 2015. So if a MMA fighter fought during those year then their fought can be counted as one of the 3 fights needed. Example 3 fights in Bellator (2009-2015) or 2 fights in Bellor (2009 - 2015) and 1 fight in UFC that would counts as total 3 fights in top tier. Let me know if anything else I could help. Do note the draft will stay in Wikipedia for 6 months before deleted. So you might want to save the body text in "note" / "notepage" (not words) so you dont need to recreate the content again. Let me know if anything else I could help. Stay safe and best.

talk) 02:02, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Yes he fought in 2014. That’s one ufc and one Bellator. So after his next UFC fight I should publish it? Brosenow (talk) 02:05, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Last question, does the contender series count as one? Brosenow (talk) 02:29, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for bothering you but after Jaynes fights next week I should resubmit correct? He has 1 Bellator fight in 2014 and would have 2 ufc fights Brosenow (talk) 02:53, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Cassiopeia: sorry forgot to tag you in the replies. Jaynes fought once in Bellator in 2014. Saturday will be his 2nd UFC Fight. Should I submit after the fight? Brosenow (talk) 23:26, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Brosenow, Jaynes will be notable after his fight this Sunday a

talk) 09:19, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

@Cassiopeia: Sounds good I can do that. Thank you for getting back to me! Stay safe as well Brosenow (talk) 16:08, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Brosenow, I have improved the ref and adding some content. Btw Dana White Contender Series does not count as one of the UFC fights. Stay safe.

talk) 04:12, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Alright that’s what I was thinking thank you for confirming. Stay safe as well Brosenow (talk) 14:18, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Cassiopeia: if a fighter fought in Bellator 5 times (2016-2018) and once in the ufc would he meet the notability standards? Brosenow (talk) 05:22, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Brosenow, Bellator was a top tier promoter from 2009 to 2015, so a fighter fought from 2016 onward is not considered fought under tier one promoter which is the requirement to meet

talk) 08:53, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

@Cassiopeia: thank you for answering. I understood the Jaynes situation but with 5 Bellator fights I didn’t know if that bypassed the standards. Thank you Brosenow (talk) 14:36, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cassiopeia was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

As mentioned in your talk page, the subject fails

WP:MMABIO

requirements. Pls wait until the subject secure 3 fights under tier one promoter, UFC of Invicta, before resubmiting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Justin Jaynes
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  Draft:Justin Jaynes, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

talk) 01:47, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

(talk page watcher) Done. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 19:32, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Willsome429: thank you Brosenow (talk) 21:46, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Justin Jaynes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

talk) 23:44, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Twitter and Fantasy Football feeds are insufficient to establish that he actually played a game. I had a cursory search on NFL.com and couldn't see any stats for Malik Taylor..

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Malik Taylor (American football)
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  Draft:Malik Taylor (American football), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 07:25, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

Draft:Malik Taylor (American football). Thanks! Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 12:22, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

@Willsome429: I know he played yesterday but he must not of recorded any stats. I’ll wait till I can find a better source Brosenow (talk) 13:08, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PFR must've just been a little slow on updating their stuff. I've cleaned up the page and moved it into the mainspace. As a general editing note, references come after punctuation. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 02:37, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Willsome429: awesome thank you Brosenow (talk) 20:54, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Scott Symons (American football) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet

WP:NSPORTS

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:00, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Brosenow. It has been over six months since you last edited the

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 00:09, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Brosenow. It has been over six months since you last edited the

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:39, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

Draft:Brandon Austin. Thanks! Bkissin (talk) 03:12, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

Draft:Brandon Austin. Thanks! Bkissin (talk) 03:44, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

The article

reliable source

that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Zack Steffen, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:31, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Zack Steffen, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 01:42, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I added a source to the page. Is Transfer Markt not a reliable Source? I know Stefan has played in more than 1 game for Man City Brosenow (talk) 12:51, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Steffen has played a lot of cup games, but he has one appearance in the domestic league, which is what we enter in the infobox.

talk) 14:20, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chicago Bears, you may be blocked from editing. Politicsfan4 (talk) 20:10, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]