User talk:Cnbrb/Archive/2017

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

I notice that on a couple of your recent messages on a talk page you've signed with a date and time but no user name. I wonder whether you accidentally used 5 tildes rather than 4? --David Biddulph (talk) 14:46, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

I use the four tildes but it doesn't work for some reason. Are 5 tildes also a thing? Cnbrb (talk) 14:48, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Just testing the 5 tildes. 14:48, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

I didn't know 5 tildes even existed but it must be the reason.Cnbrb (talk) 14:49, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

There are three forms, see

WP:5TILDES. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk

) 00:54, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you - you learn something new every day! (now carefully types 4 tildes...) Cnbrb (talk) 11:05, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Template:LUL line label has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 15:18, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

On 19 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells is a term given to people, traditionally ascribed as being from Royal Tunbridge Wells, who write letters of incensed conservative moral outrage? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:01, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello - The information you've added to the History section repeats quite a lot of the detail that's already there in the Architecture section, including architect, Temple of the Winds, Plymouth Grove etc. I don't think it's needed in both places, and my own preference would be for it to sit in the Architecture section. KJP1 (talk) 12:36, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Moved before I'd even finished. The extra detail's very good. Best regards. KJP1 (talk) 12:38, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Oh I was hoping nobody would notice until I'd corrected it! You're too quick....! I've merged the duplicate content and am making a couple of historical additions. Thanks Cnbrb (talk) 12:41, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Manchester Metrolink, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Middleton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alderaan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CGI. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aldbury, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bust and Hind. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tatooine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bestine. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks....

Let's see what the response is. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:54, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

We shall see - there's definitely a lot of legal inconsistency which could be tightened up, although obviously I have my view against deletion.... we'll see what happens! Cnbrb (talk) 10:31, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I have significantly expanded and improved this article over the past few weeks and I was wondering if you, as one of the original contributors to the article, could possibly cast your eye over it? I'm hoping to take it to GA/FA before long. Many thanks. Aiken D 23:05, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi - wow! Well done, a lot of work! I'll look at it sometime - so good to see such a big contribution. thank you for all your work.Cnbrb (talk) 11:06, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV (talk

The article Cassiobury House you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Cassiobury House for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV (talk) 14:22, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

I reverted your edit to

Hi - thanks for the heads-up. Don't think I've quite got to the stage of "senior moments"... yet! Of course, it might have helped if I had added some sort of references, for which I apologise. Anyway, here's the official info, indicating that the Busway services now run all the way to MK. Here's the Busway website if you want to investigate further. Perhaps you'd like to find some more precise info and update as you think is appropriate. Cnbrb (talk) 17:55, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The

discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Electronic cigarette topic area, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here

.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

QuackGuru (talk) 19:38, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

On 15 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Foundling Hospital Anthem, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Handel composed the Foundling Hospital Anthem in 1749 for a benefit concert for abandoned children in London? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Foundling Hospital Anthem. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Foundling Hospital Anthem), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih^Talk 01:32, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Nice DYK. - I am working on a "recent death", - I simply have no time to blow up something small, sorry. I think I made two useful suggestion: go to the article talk, and a name. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:35, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Fine, no worries. I'll leave it. Cnbrb (talk) 13:40, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

	The Writer's Barnstar
	You have been a perfect contributer to Wikipedia through your constructive edits and I reviewed some of your articles like Dan Perri which have been written in a fabulous way and I proud to review your article. Thanks for your vital contributions and I hope you would continue your consistent editing in the future. Abishe (talk) 08:09, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Goodness me! Thank you!! Cnbrb (talk) 17:01, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:16, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Precious

Anglican church music

Thank you for quality articles around choral music, beginning with London Symphony Chorus, more recently Foundling Hospital Anthem, for articles on historic places and people, for uploading images, for categories and templates such as Anglican church music, for improving as Es ist ein Ros entsprungen, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:43, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Cnbrb. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Move discussions

Hi, Cnbrb. Thanks for starting those move discussions for

WP:RM/TR. They were all contested, resulting in six separate and concurrent RM discussions (for some reason, I think New English Hymnal was forgotten about so no discussion was started). In consultation with TonyBallioni

, I withdrew all of the requests that hadn't been commented on yet so as to ensure that I could devote myself fully to the discussions.

The discussion at Talk:Anglican Missal § Requested move 17 December 2017 remains ongoing if you wouldn't mind lending your two cents. And regarding the other withdrawn requests and the forgotten request, might you be interested in starting RM discussions for English Hymnal, New English Hymnal, and English Missal?

Thanks again, 142.161.81.20 (talk) 20:41, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi thanks for getting in touch. Oh! It's all so complicated! I'll see if I can chip in - I wish there was somewhere that these discussions could be conducted in one place as a matter of naming conventions rather than on an ad-hoc basis. Cnbrb (talk) 22:10, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Heddwch ac ewyllys da

		Compliments of the season Wishing you all the best for 2018 — good health, sufficient wealth, peace and contentment
		Cheers! ‑ ‑ Gareth Griffith‑Jones The Welsh Buzzard ‑ ‑ 18:44, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Diolch yn fawr iawn! Have a great Christmas yourself! Cnbrb (talk) 01:32, 25 December 2017 (UTC)