User talk:Cortezjayel

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

I noticed your recent edit to List of earthquakes in the Philippines does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Dawnseeker2000 07:51, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2022 Luzon earthquake, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 09:38, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2022 Luzon earthquake, you may be blocked from editing. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 06:39, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi it's been brought to my attention that a checkuser on Commons has blocked the account P88 Xft as being a sockpuppet of yours, which you used to evade your block over there. I see that P88 Xft edit 2022 Luzon earthquake, an article which you have edited many times through this account, but you have not publicly disclosed the connection between the accounts. In light of the guidance offered there, please explain why you were editing an article using two separate accounts. Girth Summit _(blether) 13:00, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please accept my apologies - the note I left above was intended for someone else. I'm not sure how I managed to post it on your talk page - I can only assume that I clicked on the wrong link from the article's history or something like that. Again, sorry for my carelessness. Best Girth Summit _(blether) 23:40, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2022 Luzon earthquake. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 01:28, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2022 Luzon earthquake. Do not misuse the label markers in the infobox. You have attempted this change five times, all of which have been reverted, so stop it now. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 05:16, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Maid in Malacañang, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Chlod (say hi!) 02:27, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Maid in Malacañang. Chlod (say hi!) 02:34, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2022 Luzon earthquake. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 02:41, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 03:03, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  WaggersTALK 12:31, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for disruptive editing. As you immediately resumed your disruptive editing after your previous block expired, without any attempt to engage in discussion about your edits or behaviour, you are giving me little choice but to extend your block further. Please make the effort to discuss your edits when your block expires. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  WaggersTALK 10:55, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Miss Universe 2022, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. ☆ Bri (talk) 16:02, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, I'm Sciencefish. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pia Wurtzbach, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sciencefish (talk) 21:46, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]