talk) 01:59, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to .
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions " link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page . Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk ) 18:03, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[ reply ]
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk ) 20:18, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[ reply ]
sockpuppet editing
There is an open WP:SPI case looking at sockpuppet editing primarily on the Johann Hari / Talk page. As you edited the Johann Hari/Talk page between 2004 and 2011, your input is welcomed.
Category:Gamma Cassiopeiae variables , which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 19:49, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[ reply ]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chloe Angeline Stickney Hall.gif , has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page . You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk ) 17:40, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[ reply ]
Hello. You are receiving this message because of a
WP:BN for review by the crats. Thank you.
MBisanz talk 04:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
[ reply ]
(delivered by mabdul 23:12, 3 December 2012 (UTC))[ reply ]
Category:Astronomy people , which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger One ping only 21:35, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[ reply ]
The article Pelageya Shajn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not notable under any criteria. No source that I can find (including a few about her husband) gives her more than a passing mention. Per Notability and a discussion at here , discovering a few asteroids or even having an asteroid named after her does not make a subject notable.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process , but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RockMagnetist (talk ) 19:06, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[ reply ]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articles titled "Transit of X from Y", of which you have authored one or more, are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted .
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transit of Venus from Uranus until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Primefac (talk ) 05:22, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[ reply ]
The real name of "A. Laurent" was Joseph Jean Pierre Laurent . The Minor Planet Center now lists the discoverer of 51 Nemausa as "J. J. P. Laurent" rather than "A. Laurent". You discussed this at User_talk:Urhixidur/Archive/2004#O._Bancilhon -- P.T. Aufrette (talk ) 06:13, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect
talk) 16:26, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
[ reply ]
The article
because of the following concern:
No indication this passes
WP:PLOT
. Minor plot device, sources are all 100% primary, no indication of real world significance/impact/reception. Pure fancruft.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page .
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process , but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 10:08, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[ reply ]
The article The Initiative (Buffy the Vampire Slayer organization) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence this fictional organization passes
WP:NFICTION
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page .
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process , but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 09:28, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[ reply ]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Initiative (Buffy the Vampire Slayer organization) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted .
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Initiative (Buffy the Vampire Slayer organization) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
talk) 00:37, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Hello Curps,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged
Zaurac
for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion , but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Xx236 (talk ) 10:32, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading File:90 Antiope.gif . I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use . However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion . This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent ; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed |<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page , write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license , or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link . Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy . If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page . Thank you. Vitaium (talk ) 12:56, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[ reply ]
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:90 Antiope.gif . The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use . However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion . Thank you. Vitaium (talk ) 13:01, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[ reply ]
The redirect List of people charged with Section 213 of the USA PATRIOT ACT has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines . Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 15 § List of people charged with Section 213 of the USA PATRIOT ACT until a consensus is reached. Tartar Torte 00:52, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[ reply ]
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Gastonpied.gif . The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use . However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion . Thank you. --B-bot (talk ) 02:28, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[ reply ]
The redirect Æon Flux(movie) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines . Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 15 § Æon Flux(movie) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk ) 09:09, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[ reply ]
The redirect Khovanski has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines . Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 3 § Khovanski until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 19:20, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[ reply ]
The redirect Betria has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines . Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 22 § Betria until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk ) 19:48, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[ reply ]