Please don't add these translations to articles on New Zealand places. Scottish Gaelic is not an official language of New Zealand, nor a commonly used one in that country. If there are articles on the same places in the Scottish Wikipedia, add interwiki links instead.-gadfium 23:03, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is important for these particular articles, as the names of these places are an anglicisation of the original Gaelic name. If you feel that rather it should be mentioned elsewhere in the article then you are welcome to change that. In the case of Seumas MacCoinneach/James Mckenzie; as he only spoke Gaelic, his actual name here is important.
It may well be appropriate to mention the origins of the names in the articles, but this should include references and be in the body of the article, not immediately following the article title.-gadfium 08:44, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale
.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:49, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-free rationale for File:PoorMan Icon.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to
non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale
.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:29, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Albatron Technology. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Your comments were not appreciated.GSK✉✓ 09:00, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
The article already had penalty of notoriety before I edited it. You may not have appreciated my comments, but they were warranted. I am not going to waste my time contesting poor moderation by someone who does even understand the topic of the article. (talk)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Albatron Logo.svg
Thank you for uploading
image copyright tag
; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. GSK✉✓ 09:03, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination of
NZXT Corp.
for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NZXT Corp. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cheers AKS 17:53, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Belfastnz1.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:06, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Another one of your uploads, File:Belfastnz4.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:04, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Another one of your uploads, File:Belfastnz5.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:04, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Another one of your uploads, File:Belfastnz3.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:07, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Another one of your uploads, File:Belfastnz2.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:07, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Another one of your uploads, File:Bryndwrnz2.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:24, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Another one of your uploads, File:Bryndwrnz1.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:24, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Haiku-small-logo.png
Thank you for uploading
image copyright tag
; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our
Tad bit padatic to say that a page is non existing becuase its name was changed. Dlpkbr (talk) 08:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Haiku-small-logo.png
Thank you for uploading
image copyright tag
; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our
File permission problem with File:Lian Li PC-A17.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lian Li PC-A17.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the
CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
OTRS pending
}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 05:07, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current