User talk:Edson Frainlar

Hello, Edson Frainlar! talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 22:45, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply ] Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Domdeparis (talk) 10:35, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• I see that at Talk:DMI College of Engineering you wrote that the article should not be deleted "because.. this is a true article about DMI College of Engineering. You can verify it." However, if you had read the messages about the deletion proposal, both on this page and on the article, you would have seen that the reason for deletion was copyright infringement, not untruthfulness or unverifiability.
• Apart from the copyright issue, there is another reason why the article was unsuitable for Wikipedia, namely that it was purely promotional. A Wikipedia article must be written from a neutral point of view, and should not say, for example, that its subject is "prestigious", that its surroundings are "salubrious", that the managers have a "clear vision", and so on. The editor who uses the pseudonym "
  talk) 11:38, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Edson Frainlar, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Edson Frainlar! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Rev. Fr. Dr. J.E. Arulraj requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

The article

reliable source

that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

A tag has been placed on DMI Foundations Trust, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See
  Wikipedia:FAQ/Business
  for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See
  section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
  .

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at DMI Foundations Trust, you may be blocked from editing. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at DMI Foundations Trust. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at DMI Foundations Trust. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:49, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on DMI Foundations Trust, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See
  Wikipedia:FAQ/Business
  for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See
  section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
  .

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article J. E. Arulraj is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. E. Arulraj until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sisters of Daughters of Mary Immaculate and Collaborators has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unsourced, wildly promotional, unrescuable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bishonen | talk 22:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Fathers of Missionaries of Mary Immaculate has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sourced to the society's own material only, with no indication of notability, and wildly promotional.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bishonen | talk 22:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Don't get into my nerves by continuously saying such filthy reasons. I have given all type of references available in internet. Moreover as a proof of religious congregation, i have included the reference from www.indiancathokiconline.com . Please view all the references carefully. Don't come and complaint without proper observation. Change your attitude. If you are perfect, let those skills rest with you. You don't pinpoint others like a senseless creature. Edson Frainlar (talk) 11:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Edson Frainlar. You posted an argument at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/J. E. Arulraj. It should be at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. E. Arulraj, without the "talk", because these project pages are discussions in themselves – you don't have to go to the talkpage to discuss, in fact nobody would notice your post on the talkpage. I have moved it to the right page. Bishonen | talk 22:27, 9 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Please stop harassing and attacking everybody who speaks about your articles or tries to talk with you, as you did here, here, here, and here (the last is a whole dialogue, very aggressive on your side). They are experienced users trying to help by advising you about Wikipedia's policies, and all they get in return from you is abuse. Wikipedia is a place where people are supposed to be able to discuss articles without being attacked. Stop it or you may be

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:02, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am a new writer in wikipedia. For all articles immediately it is placed under speedy deletion list. No one is saying the reason for proposing the article to get deleted. Really I was disappointed. Whatever I do , (i don't want to mention their name) they will be there to discourage me by repeatedly saying to delete. No time will be given for changing the errors in that article. From all my experience, i realized that Wikipedia is not a good place for emerging or budding article writers. I have decided to get out of wikipedia. Sorry for any inconvenience caused by me. Finally, i say that this is not a healthy place for new writers. Edson Frainlar (talk) 14:17, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's fine for new writers who realize this is an encyclopedia and not a place to promote people/organizations. If you try writing about subjects you don't have a personal relationship with you'll probably get a different reception. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:51, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | talk 15:39, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All right, that's enough. You keep saying you quit, but apparently that doesn't mean you'll quit harassing people and impugning their

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Edson Frainlar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #17885 was submitted on Mar 25, 2017 19:28:55. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 19:28, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into

sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Edson Frainlar, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations

, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

SorryNotSorry ✽ ✉ 07:43, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article DMI College of Engineering has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BhaskaraPattelar (talk) 09:04, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]