User talk:Eteethan/Archive 4

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

First of all, thanks for the barnstar! I really appreciate it! I do request though that you make sure to mark a page as "patrolled" when tagging it for speedy deletion. Thanks :) --allthefoxes ^(Talk) 00:52, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

@Allthefoxes: First, you're welcome! Second, I use Twinkle for most of my tagging but if something pops up on Huggle I tag it through huggle. I'm not sure if Huggle marks CSDs as patrolled but after this message it evidently doesn't. I'll ask for that in a feature request when I have time. You should look into getting rollback, as much as I like Stiki I think Huggle is a lot more effective (but I'm a little biased). Thanks, and all the best, Ethan. Eteethan(talk)🎄 01:04, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

@Eteethan: - I was planning on giving it a try once I got rb, but I plan on waiting a little bit before asking. Definitely seems nice! --allthefoxes ^(Talk) 01:06, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

@Allthefoxes: I see you got rollback. Have fun! Eteethan(talk)🎄 00:35, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Sorry you left a message on my page about the edit I made. I am not used to messaging on this format and am more used to editing on wikis. I am actually an editor on the Harry Potter Wiki and you msged me about me editing the muggle page. It was actually announced by J.k Rowling  

on November 5th that the American version of the word muggle is a ¨no-maj¨ as in no magic and that the term muggle is a pretty muched used only in the UK. In the new upcoming Harry Potter prequel movie ,Fantastic Beast And Where to find them, which takes place in New York 1926 the term no-maj is used frequently by american wizards instead of the word muggle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.218.27.80 (talk) 03:18, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Fair game removing my post. I was going to change it after screen grabbing the original post for fun. On a serious note, Taxis at the train station are a joke. I sat there waiting for 45 mins last year and people should know that there are no services for last mile connections. If I had read this that would be helpful information. Maybe you could look into this and find out what they do provide in regards to Taxis.

Hi. If Betty Boop was fashioned after Helen Kane, who copied her style and voice from "Baby Esther" Jones, who sang in the Cotton Club, then why isn't Esther Jones given any credit or royalties for the Betty Boop character, since she is the Original inspiration for the voice,song,look, and character????? Thanks 166.170.222.219 (talk) 19:46, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Howdy. A quick read of the Z v. S fuse articles, as well as the illustration referenced will show why the lazy dog gets a 'Z' fuze. Air Force v. air force: Caps are standard use for the USAF as opposed to a generic air force. I'm not interested in a revision war and would enjoy hearing your input otherwise, will revert.

Regards,

PC2601:283:301:1500:50CB:4410:E2EF:DCD3 (talk) 22:19, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi. I'm really not knowledgeable about this topic and when I saw "Fuze" I thought it was a band. You can revert. Eteethan(talk)🎄 22:37, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Wilco. I'm a military nut and have spent most of a decade in the monotonously ongoing 'V' v. 'Z' debate. Hope I didn't come across as too short. A band named 'Fuze'? There's something I'll gladly defer to the expertise of others. Most of my music comes from the last millennium.

We get a lot of crap like that :) Eteethan(talk)🎄 22:51, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

¡Prospero año! Keep on keepin' the faith. - Pete

Hi. I just filled out my registration form for ACC and, following the guide, here is my ID noticeboard diff. I just finished reading the private policy and the ACC guide. Cheers, Ethan. Eteethan(talk)🎄 01:10, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Much appreciated, I upset someone or someones when I protected a page! Doug Weller talk 16:17, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

You have no right to edit this page about Laszlo Csatary. Most of what is on this page is fabrication. You do not know what you are talking about in this case. If you want the truth read the book listed there otherwise leave the page alone. I will be monitoring this page weekly from now on to avoid any sabotage or erasure of the truth here. Who are you to make a judgement in this case? Are you working for someone? Do not mess with other people's lives when you don't know what you are doing? There are now legal consequences...even in your country!

First of all, I have every right to edit any page on Wikipedia. You can't stop me from editing a page. Second, "There are now legal consequences...even in your country!" sounds like a legal threat. Read

WP:LEGAL. Eteethan(talk)

🎄 16:33, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Taco spiders

Taco spiders are real and I'm sorry that you had to take my edit down. They live in the Arkansas River Valley. JUDY IS REAL AND RARE!!!!! Lots of people don't believe us, because they don't understand the endless possibilities of awesomeness. Well good sir, LOTS OF PEOPLE DIDNT BELIEVE THAT HARRY POTTER WAS REAL BUT IT IS!!!!! I'm not mad, I just hope you can open your mind to amazing stuff like this With love,

       Napoleon dynamite, owner of Judy Spider Judy.taco (talk) 16:31, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Really? Eteethan(talk)🎄 16:33, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Here's a comment because you said that I could do this so technically you can't report me for asking you a question leaving a comment when you said I could do that. Ok here it is- vandalism is leaving something in appropriate on a webpage or the side of a building or something. This isn't vandalism. Call it what you want but it's not vandalism. It's an innocent joke, an informative notation, etc. but it isn't vandalism. I'm not mad at this, and I won't do it on your page again, but I would still like to tell you that I'm not meaning any trouble and it's all just a "joke" Judy.taco (talk) 16:44, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Please read

WP:VAND.Eteethan(talk)

🎄 17:51, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Congratulations from STiki!

	The Anti-Vandalism + STiki Barnstar
	Congratulations, Eteethan! You're receiving this barnstar because you recently crossed the 1,000 classification threshold using leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (developer) and ƬheStrikeΣagle 14:32, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! Eteethan(talk) 16:09, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

You do not have the right to suppress the truth. That is illegal. You do not know what you are talking about in this case. If you persist in vandalizing this entry you will need a lot of money to deal with possible legal consequences. Documented evidence proves my edit correct. Do not touch it. What business is of yours anyway? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.150.36.88 (talk) 15:10, 4 January 2016‎ (UTC)

What do you mean, "Legal consequences"? Are you going to sue me? Is that a violation of Federal or State law? Eteethan(talk) 20:20, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

(

blocked from editing immediately. General Ization ^Talk

20:24, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

I Will Report You

Everyone has the right to defend themselves against slander and libel in America. No matter what anyone says. Anything else is censorship and suppression of the truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.150.36.88 (talk • contribs) 01:04, 5 January 2016‎ (UTC)

I have edited your contribution at

you will be blocked from editing, and I will be the first to request that you be blocked. Understood? General Ization ^Talk

02:11, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

In addition, please offer a translation of the title Kassa Arnyekaban: A Csatary-ugy a dokumentumok tukreben so that it can be included for our mostly English-speaking audience. General Ization ^Talk 02:16, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Eteethan, I noticed that you reverted all of my edits on the List of IndyCar Series teams page, saying that they weren't constructive. The reason that I made those edits was because a large majority of the information was either outdated, or seemed unnecessary. A fellow editor edited the article after my edits were undone and updated the section, so I have no desire to have my edits replaced or returned to the article, but I am still unsure as to why my edits were removed. Thank you for your help. 173.67.173.109 (talk) 00:48, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Removing content and replacing it with "None" is very suspicious. Instead of doing this maybe start a discussion on the talk page. Eteethan(talk) 20:04, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

The reason that I put "none" there was because there really weren't any at the present time, but there may be some in the future. And the talk page hasn't been used in nine years, but I see what you are saying. 173.67.173.109 (talk) 20:24, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Eteethan, This is my first time and I'm not sure I understand all instructions. Thank you for your patience. On Dec 22, 2015, I noticed that a portion of information in the "History" section of "U.S. Route 178" that was missing from what I had read many times in the past. See below:

US 178 is built along one of the OLDEST NATIVE AMERICAN PATHS IN THE SOUTHEAST. It is recorded by the Smithsonian Institution's Bureau of Ethnology's 42nd Annual Report, 1924-1925 in a 1923 map section about the Indian trails of the southeast by William E. Myer. It is labeled trail #81 and starts at present-day Charleston and comes inland through Dorchester to the town of Orangeburg, S.C. along present-day US 178 until it intersects with present-day I-20 running from Columbia to Augusta. From this point, upcountry, US 178 has varied in its modern route from the route of the ancient trail though sections of it are still the same as the trail.

Presently it reads as follows: US 178 is built along and starts at present-day Charleston and comes inland through Dorchester to the town of Orangeburg, S.C. along present-day US 178 until it intersects with present-day I-20 running from Columbia to Augusta. From this point, upcountry, US 178 has varied in its modern route from the route of the ancient trail though sections of it are still the same as the trail.

The lines missing were as follows:

one of the OLDEST NATIVE AMERICAN PATHS IN THE SOUTHEAST. It is recorded by the Smithsonian Institution's Bureau of Ethnology's 42nd Annual Report, 1924-1925 in a 1923 map section about the Indian trails of the southeast by William E. Myer. It is labeled trail #81

I saw where I was allowed to edit and tried to correct this, just as it was originally. I then received a message that stated it appeared to be "non constructive". If I may be allowed, please refer to the source of information where the fact that was omitted is found on page 447 from the book <Annual report of the Bureau of American Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution> as being labeled as Road #81, "The trail from Charleston to Fort Charlotte". A map is included on the next page illustrating <The Trail System of the Southeastern United States in the early Colonial Period by W.E. Myer in 1923>.

Other sources of use and description about this ancient trial can be found in the book, <Indians and Artifacts in the Southeast by Bert W. Bierer>. Also in the year 1770 parts of this Indian trail was constructed into a road as found in the <Statues at Large of South Carolina, Acts relating to Roads, Bridges and Ferries, page 233 Roman Numeral I>. The road can be seen in use during the Amerian Revolution, with one source one being the book <Ninety Six: The Struggle for the South Carolina Back Country" by Robert D. Bass> when Lord Rawdon was on this way from Charleston through Orangeburg to Fort Ninety Six to relieve Col. Cruger. <Maps used as an instrument for teaching in schools> show Lord Rawdon used the very road that matches with the route of what is now part of Highway 178.

History is amazing to see and Wikipedia is a wonderful source for many people to see what once was. I would like to urge you to reconsider returning the omitted information that matches with the Bureau of Ethnology dated 1924-1925 to the Wikipedia website about Highway 178 under the category "History".

Thank you so much for your time and consideration in this matter. 173.93.155.211 (talk) 13:12, 6 January 2016 (UTC) [Special:Contributions/173.93.155.211|173.93.155.211]] (talk) 13:12, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Try it again without capitol letters. Eteethan(talk) 18:47, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for the invitation from your robot to respond here. however i responded where you originally wrote a message to me, on my talk page. User talk:190.128.84.249 190.128.84.249 (talk) 22:23, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page.Eteethan(talk) 12:24, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

ah thanks for fixing the heading problem on Flatlands, Brooklyn, man... how do you do that though?

You get to know these things after you get to know Wikipedia. Thanks for your contrbutions. Wikipedia needs people like you. You should create an account!Eteethan(talk) 01:10, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Richview Middle School is a real and public school. I don't understand why we can't make a wiki for our school. Darre123 (talk) 02:15, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

You certainly can if you can find reliable sources to show that the school is notable. See

WP:Notable. I redirected the article because as it stood there was no claim to notability, and it's standard procedure to redirect new articles about non-notable schools (less than high schools) to the school board or town. If the school is notable then by all means write the article in your user space and have it moved back over the redirect. The mere existence of a middle school is not sufficient to show notability though. Meters (talk

) 02:22, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Richview Middle School

2

What's the purpose of your changes to this? I redirected a completely non-notable middle school article to the school board rather than having it deleted. There seems to be no point in labelling a redirect as a stub since there is nothing to expand. There's only slightly more use in labelling it as an orphan. Why ask people to track down any references to this school just so they can add a link to a redirect? The only article I see that refers to this school is the school board article, which would make for a circular redirect. The only other likely article is the town article, which does not list any middle schools. As for expanding "Redr" to "This is a redirect" they both expand to exactly the same thing, but knock yourself out. Meters (talk) 02:16, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

I left the tags on the redirect in case there's something I'm missing. Meters (talk) 02:58, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

@Meters: AWB often insists on these little changes, like changing "cn" to "citation needed". I didn't mean to add the stub and orphan tags, as I'm still getting used to this software. Eteethan(talk) 12:27, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

No problem. I was afraid I was missing something. I see someone else has removed the orphan and stub tags in the meantime (and fixed my formatting blunder too). Meters (talk) 21:49, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Great, and sorry for the inconvenience. Eteethan(talk) 21:49, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Eteethan,
See this.
--Shirt58 (talk) 12:55, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

@Shirt58: Whoops. That was a complete mistake. Eteethan(talk) 19:50, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Dear Ethan

John Boyega is a traitor. The galaxy deserves to know of his treachery

Love From FN-2199 (TR-8R)

HAHAHA Wikipedia

vandalism is SO FUNNY!! HAHA WOW! --allthefoxes ^(Talk

) 22:12, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

DOGE, behave...or else you will become...TRAITOR!!!

Love From FN-2199 (TR-8R)

Ok, then... But please stop. Eteethan(talk) 22:18, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

It's a game that indisputably has a wide variety of names, and it seems unhelpful for wikipedia to pretend that's the only name. In particular it's unfriendly for search engines as these alternate names are just as likely to be search terms as the "picture consequences" name - in particular as that name is ambiguous. Boardgame geek is fairly encyclopedic on this matter, I simply selected the names from their list that I have encountered it under most frequently. Fatphil (talk) 22:51, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello

I wrote an article about the Syrian actor Wael Sharaf, and it's was deleted by Bbb23 and I don't know the real reason behind it, because I can find other articles about Syrian actors on wikipedia. Therefor I want and answer for my question and I hope we can bring the article back again, because he is one of the most popular actor in the Arab world. By the way, I'm in touch with the actor himself and I have all rights to share information about him.

Regards

Wisam Shakir.

It doesn't look like it was deleted. If you want to ask Bbb23, he might have more information. Eteethan(talk) 17:42, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Eteethan, I saw only your first edit in my watchlist, and it was only after I edited the article that I realized that had been a little edit war going on in the meantime. Was that necessary? Did you disagree with them on the substance or only on the form? If the latter, why didn't you simply put the right template in in the first place and thank the editor for pointing it out? — Sebastian 00:38, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

@SebastianHelm: It was purely the style, and since I was RCPing on Huggle I just left a quick note.

I see. Yes, interesting, the use of automated tools can lead us to be less personal. Well, I guess we'll just have to live with it, since there is a lot of work that Huggle saves. I am grateful that you're doing that work, so please don't feel discouraged by my critical message. (BTW, another automatism didn't work: I didn't get a "yo!". I wonder if T78424 is risen from the dead?) — Sebastian 00:56, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

@SebastianHelm: Uh-uo. While you're here, can you PC protect Pleasantville High School (New York)? Sorry to ask but having problems there. :) Did that ping work? Eteethan(talk) 01:00, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Done. I set it to one week, since this appears to be only a very recent spade of incidents. But the ping again didn't work. — Sebastian 18:26, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

The riddle of the ping has been solved by Mattflaschen. Check out his explanation at T78424. — Sebastian 21:12, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

@SebastianHelm: Oops. I forgot to sign my own post. That is completely my fault. I hope this one worked. Eteethan(talk) 21:53, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Yup! — Sebastian 21:56, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Eteethan, I am editing the page for my old high school - it is not vandalism. My edits got undid by a BOT, I think. I actually just started using wikipedia.

is there some way to prevent the BOTS? Or do I just keep an eye on the edits? thanks

you can search reading central catholic high school for my edits — Preceding unsigned comment added by Papalecki (talk • contribs) 02:40, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

No, there is no way to prevent cluebot from reverting your edits. Eteethan(talk) 22:09, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Good morning Wish this finds you well. We have no idea why Rezan's page is subject to deletetion and why you consider our corrects not constructive. Rezan is a respectable artist with significant work with significant people. To be frank ,one of the ten approx, Greek artist that work internationally (since the 70s) and that have been featured in major Greek and International publications. Also the correction were confirmed with her PR rep and she agrees to them.That the text should be smaller and more simple and particular. Thank you. PS:ALso,The only reason we've been removing deletion notices is that they're being made by unregistered users and/or competitors that try to rate it as of not of high interest. If the notice was placed by an admin, we would be looking to improve the page as per their guidelines - however, we've been far too busy removing erroneous additions and edits by unregistered users.

If the page could be protected, we would be able to update it as per your guidelines PS2:The page has tones of visit, we do not know if you can see that and we have been receiving fantastic feedback.Also this page was not created by us,but from other users.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.65.169.47 (talk) 01:40, 15 January 2016 (UTC) 

@LavaBaron: Thank you for the funny barnstar! Eteethan(talk) 19:47, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Truth is truth. Nolies10 (talk) 02:24, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

@

reliable source, than it is not truth. Eteethan(talk)

14:50, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Hawkmountain Ranger Page

Hello my edit was not vandalism. A staff member is a leader, it is self evident that a staff leads. Their motto is inconsistent. SAVE THE BUNNIES!!!!

66.87.31.218 (talk) 15:11, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Dear Eteethan, You have made a dire mistake reverting my honest contributions to the page Cameron Borthwick-Jackson. This information is truthful and new, and has only just been announced on national news. Please reconsider your negative choices in life. You may also need to eat a fan. Sincerely, Borthwick-Jackson himself — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.185.118.185 (talk) 15:24, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:25, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! I really needed some sugar. Eteethan(talk) 15:37, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kcmartenslol (talk • contribs) 19:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Hii I just wanted you to know that 173.67.173.109 editor removed content from List of IndyCar Series teams it seemed like a suspicious edit so I reverted it but later the editor explained to me that it was outdated information that the editor removed I need your help what should I do I'm quite new on wikipedia and you seem to have reverted this editors previous edit that is the reason I'm asking your help. Dinnypaul (talk) 16:38, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

That page needs modifying as it is misleading, basing the principle argument stated as fact but based on a student thesis.

Correct it yourself if you prefer but it given the current in out eu debate it can't be left to stand as is.  Oldguyscruel (talk) 19:32, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Dear Wikipedia User

Could you please let me know what's wrong with my article, I'm new here could you please help me out

Regards Louise LR 19:33, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi. I am sorry i did not see that you have already mentioned that thing. You did great job Turaevshokhrukh (talk) 19:34, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Actually, it was sourced. I was restoring sourced text that was deleted without explanation. 216.58.11.15 (talk) 20:22, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello Eteethan, why did you revert my edit at RS-24_Yars three minutes later and then accuse me of being "unconstructive"? Think about it: refueling a solid-fuel rocket makes no sense. Take some time to study the topic before blaming me. In my opinion the stupid STiki tool needs to be used by intelligent human with discernment. Boevaya mashina (talk) 20:46, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

My edit was obviously no case of Wp:Vandalism. So if your "Responsibility" should not just be a Buzz-Phrase, could you at least reply to my post here? I don't think that it is my part to try again. --Boevaya mashina (talk) 18:33, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

@

WP:CIVIL. STiki has been made 880,000 successful reverts. Thanks, Ethan. Eteethan(talk)

19:54, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for replying and undoing. I am sorry for possibly having expressed me wrong. I ment, if someone uses such an automated tool, he has to be careful and has to check. As far as I understood the STiki system, it is the tool that gives a warning but the human has to use his intelligence to decide. What I really don't like is, what you have written on top of this page: "If you think that your edit was correct, try again". So you reserve the right to do mistakes but the other has to work to undo your fail. On STiki: I have not seen any vandalism at all on Wp yet. Does STiki also count unsuccessful reverts? If yes, how? --Boevaya mashina (talk) 22:49, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Hey, just wondering, what are your thoughts on cotton candy? :) 2.122.144.66 (talk) 00:49, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

I thought it made sense to have the 'Notes' immediately under the table that it applied to, rather than there being another 3 tables before you get to the notes you want to look at. So I think my revision was best and I might change it back at some point.Pizzasandcider (talk) 22:02, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

I got the information that he died of tetanus from his mother's Wiki page:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonne_of_Bourbon

Where that person got it, I don't know.

Hi. You can't use Wikipedia as a source within Wikipedia. Thanks, Ethan. Eteethan(talk) 12:29, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

I've actually fixed this, and added a Google Books source supporting the tetanus claim (and a slightly younger age of death) to the article. Hallward's Ghost ^{(Kevin) (My talkpage)} 21:50, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Sorry for the confusion regarding the vandalism warnings for that IP. I've unstruck your warning, since I hadn't realized that the IP immediately vandalized the article AGAIN right after I put the level 2 warning on their talkpage. Totally my mistake. Hallward's Ghost ^{(Kevin) (My talkpage)} 21:49, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Edwin D. Hill's page was incomplete, and IBEW members need to be aware of his past. Your reversions constitute historical revisionism. Transparency is needed, and facts from court records are not biased.

Hello Eteethan, Thank you for caring for this page and ensuring changes made are accurate. The Waking Down Teachers Association changed its name to the Trillium Awakening Teachers Circle, and I wanted the Wikipedia page on Waking Down to reflect that fact. The context is thoroughly detailed at http://www.trilliumawakening.org/in-depth-history/. Could you kindly review and restore the edits I made, or let me know what else is needed to proceed? Many thanks, Deborah Boyar2601:647:280:630B:58DF:235D:176B:AE9C (talk) 21:07, 27 January 2016 (UTC) http://teachers.trilliumawakening.org/DeborahBoyar/

I do not identify this as test/vandalism. It appears to have been a good faith edit. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:40, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Greetings. I've just listed that page on

) 12:41, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Ok, great. I was just NPP-ing and didn't really look at the source. Anyways, It's probably not a great idea to have a direct copy-paste page. Eteethan(talk) 12:43, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

The correction to Abe Vogoda page came from his family. I will be glad to give you his daughter phone number if you want to speak with her. Your information is wrong and it's not fair to have it on the internet with wrong information. How do you go about making the corrections. Abe Vigoda's Funeral is Sunday and his daughetr would like the page corrected as many fans will be looking at this page. Valerie — Preceding unsigned comment added by ValBarber (talk • contribs) 14:31, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Dear Eteethan,

I was asked by Carol Vigoda Fuchs ,Abe Vigoda's daughter to make these changes to his page.Abe Vigoda does not have a middle name, So I was aksed to remove Charles and listed his only child as Carol Vigoda Fuchs. Abe Funeral is on Sunday and she would like the page fixed as many Fans will be looking at this page and it would be nice to have the correct information on the internet. I'll be glad to give you her phone number for verification if you would like it. Thank You , Valerie BarberValerie Barber 18:59, 29 January 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ValBarber (talk • contribs)

Hi. First, it is not common practice to add children's names into a infobox. Second, if you can find a

reliable source for your edits, please insert it/them and your edits may stay up. Eteethan(talk)

20:22, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Wander Over Yonder Season 2 Synopsis Addding (When to add them appropriately, meant also for Geraldo)

Hi Eteethen,

I have a similar message with Geraldo about something to do with adding the synopsis before the eps. premiere as the press release have been updated just now:

"Geraldo,

What do you recommend when it comes to putting in the Synopsis? There are sources I found that I can add to the summaries for each upcoming episodes of Wander Over Yonder:

http://www.broadwayworld.com/bwwtv/article/Disney-XD-Announces-February-2016-Programming-Highlights-20160129

and

http://www.disneyabcpress.com/disneyxd/

Both updated the info of each episodes and synopsis. And they are reliable sources. Would putting in the exact same words infringe on what kind of summaries would be about? In the past, the summaries were added BEFORE the episodes aired. But deleting them until it airs seemed like it doesn't make sense that way. Paraphrasing I tried, but seemed that it's deemed not constructive enough.

Just wondering this notion."

WingedArtist28 (talk) 23:15, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Take a look at your talk page. Eteethan(talk) 23:38, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi there Eteethan,

This is the American Film Institute (AFI) and we are updating our wikipedia pages for our upcoming 50th anniversary. Within the AFI Lifetime Achievement Award page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AFI_Life_Achievement_Award#Televised_Broadcast), there lies a section titled Notable Emissions. This section, which is not only using the wrong word, as well as a part of the section above it, seem to be filled with passive aggressive conjecture when describing certain directors and actors that have not been selected to receive our award. We do not believe this information to have any particular relevance to the article as a whole, as there is not a section within the Academy Awards wikipedia page for artists that have not received Oscar nominations. Please let me know if this can be remedied and how we can go about correcting this page as soon as possible.

Thank you, AFI Social Media Team

Hi. Unfortunately, as per

edit request here. Thanks, Ethan. Eteethan(talk)

23:43, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

06:49:31, 31 January 2016 review of submission by 50.161.76.71

• 50.161.76.71 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Nou Hach Literary Association (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Now that the copyrighted material has been removed, how can I resubmit the page for consideration to be published?

It's been resubmitted. Just wait for it to be reviewed. Eteethan(talk) 13:01, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Bonjour, Je corrige la page d'Alberto Sorbelli à sa demande ; je ne peux insérer une photo qu'il m'a adressé par mail libre de droit ! Comment puis-je l'insérer dans l'infobox artiste. Pourriez-vous l'y mettre cela me rendrait service il y a toujours un souci et comme tout est en Anglais ...!!! Beaucoup de personnes sont sur cette page et j'aimerais pouvoir y travailler sereinement (j'ai recommence plusieurs fois et je commence à saturer !! Merci de faire passer le message :) Dans l'attente Cordialement./.

I am frustrated that at Ethan has reverted by edits which of been approved by the subject of the page Artcarder (talk) 00:22, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

First, we don't put div tags in articles. Second, the content was a violation of

WP:BLP. Third, the format was not proper. Fourth, the content was not cited. Eteethan(talk)

00:25, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Please unrevert my change, as I was correcting an error.

In the Galvant entry, Madalena specifically said that she was there to see the DEL, and then clarified to the servent that it stood for Dark Evil Lord as a specific character name/title. This is in line with other acronyms used on the show like D'DEW (Dark, Dark Evil Ways). Whoever created the original entry had entered it wrong "The Dark Lord" doesn't fit with the acronym the show used, which (pending renewal) could play into jokes and rhymes for DEL (like it did for D'DEW).

Well, I haven't gotten to that episode so I guess it's fine. Eteethan(talk) 12:03, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

• Talprach1 (talk · contribs)
  • talk | history | links | watch | logs
    )

Hi, I have just submitted an article, which was declined. It was declined far too quickly for its veracity to be judged. Please advise. lol — Preceding unsigned comment added by .k8976t75e4ds5w4dyvujhy7yg5h7rn (talk • contribs) 12:38, 3 February 2016 (UTC) Vandalism Removed. Eteethan(talk) 20:28, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

The change was of course supposed to be for the 2016 article - it was just a mistake! Sorry... --46.243.83.176 (talk) 19:38, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Hey next time please do not change the edits on the May City, Iowa page. My name is Jake and I live in this town and participated in this election. I have lived here my whole life. I think I know more about May City than you ethan. So please stop. I'm asking you nicely. Please stop. Thank you. (Jake) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.66.18.154 (talk) 20:23, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your "sources" are a page that returns a

404 Error and a FCC radio license. Eteethan(talk)

22:03, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Recent changes to James Patterson's author page

Hello,

You recently sent me a message regarding changes made to James Patterson's author page. I work for him at his publishing house and the changes I am making reflect the most accurate author statistics and information that we have to date. I would appreciate if the changes are able to go through, as they reflect the most accurate facts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.34.122.70 (talk) 20:34, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi I have just edited the page Jannik Blair. The Edits are of photo captions that Jannik has asked me personally to change, please accept my edits.

Regards Ryan Morich

Ryan Morich (talk) 21:12, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

He really is a linebacker. Trust me I know he is! Ricky09876 (talk) 21:14, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

If you can find a

reliable source], than he is! However, you haven't included one. Eteethan(talk)

12:11, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Mater

Ummm...the removal of vandalism, changing the name of the characters 'significant other' from a name that does not appear in the movies, to the name of a character in movie 2, who specifically states that she is his girlfriend isn't constructive?! 85.229.56.88 (talk) 21:41, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi Ethan, I don't mind reversions but I just wanted to have the extant logo updated. The new one was just announced (1 Feb 2016).

louis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oulipo2 (talk • contribs) 21:44, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

That's fine, but in your edit you removed the infobox. Eteethan(talk) 12:12, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Sorry - my login wasn't working and I was trying to move this back to Italo-Greek. Have not updated things in years - apologies if I broke etiquette. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.193.216.151 (talk) 21:55, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Read the talk page. The page was already moved from there and moving it back would require

consensus. Eteethan(talk)

12:17, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Espresso Martini

Instead of blankly changing pages that have been edited, perhaps you should consider checking WHY they have been edited? 1, the changing of 'shot' to 'short' was reverting a previous vandalization, something you seem to have been fine with? 2, the IBA recipe, which the wikipedia guidelines clearly state is to be used when one exists, clearly state 'short', not 'shot'. 3, an espresso does not COME in 'shots'. A small espresso is, however, known as a 'short' one. 85.229.56.88 (talk) 22:15, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

First of all, you really need to

edit summary next time. Please don't accuse me of being fine with vandalism (when you said reverting a previous vandalization, something you seem to have been fine with?) without taking a look at my userpage. It shows that I am, in fact, very active in counter vandalism on Wikipedia. Take a look at Wikipedia:Mistakes are allowed before you reply. Eteethan(talk)

22:33, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

"Try a edit summary next time." You mean like the one I used, and you didn't bother checking? One of those. Stepping straight to 'I changed what you did because it looked like vandalism' without actually checking what I did or why? Instead of telling me to be calm, perhaps you should consider acting a bit more professionally? I would presume that you'd at least look at what the change was, but, quite clearly, you didn't.85.229.56.88 (talk) 22:46, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Yes, you made a mistake. Reference 18 should go with the subsequent sentence because the story is not about how great a development Riverside South is, but rather about how Trump lost control of his development

Hello Eteethan. I´ve been to St Anton for several times and I think the current picture does not show St Anton in a good way. You can only see a piste like everywhere else in austria and in the valley in the background you can see Pettneu which is actual not St Anton. It would be better to use the other Picture of St Anton which I added. Thanks --24seven (talk) 10:21, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

no answer? --24seven (talk)

Sorry for the late response. If you want to change a picture, try an informative

edit summary. Thanks, Ethan. Eteethan(talk)

20:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

file deletion nomination

I was confused by your nomination of File:Net_crop_production_tropical_countries_1961-2013.png for deletion. Is the problem that I uploaded two versions? Note that the first one has a useless bit of info, which I removed in the second one. Or is it something else? CometEncke (talk) 13:55, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

@CometEncke: I moved that file to the commons (here) because files stored on Wikipedia are only there because they are copyrighted (and being used under Fair Use.) You can still use the file like it is on Wikipedia by typing [[File:Net crop production tropical countries 1961-2013.png]]. Thanks, Ethan. Eteethan(talk) 16:29, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

I removed the "General election results" section because there is already a section for electoral results and it has the same information. I said that in my edit summary, there is no need for two electoral results sections. 82.32.190.167 (talk) 22:17, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Mate, if you are some person with authority you need to get this JJMC89 "person" to stop Vandalizing my work. Its that simple. He continues to delete, without notice, which he is not entitle to do, my work. If you wonder whay Im angry then think about it....Nuro 19:59, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

@

NPA and you're probably going to be blocked. Next time, talk to him instead of attacking him. Eteethan(talk)

20:05, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi! I am working to improve my draft: TRIO bienal. One of the critics were the name of the article is bienal, but there was only one event until today (next will be 2017). So I changed it to a "single event". I mentioned my plan at the talk page of the article. Sorry for my mistake. --Robertsan (talk) 20:04, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Good afternoon. I am Byrne Offutt. I tried to make some changes to my page to update it but you erased them. Please return my changes to the page including the new links. I am an actor and would like to keep this page updated. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:B81B:62C0:5D4A:BF1F:F8ED:780D (talk) 20:01, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

You undid an edit on the change I made to List of jam band music festivals on February 16, 2016. My edit added The Peach Music Festival to the list because it is absolutely a jam band music festival that more than qualifies as an addition to the list.

I am SO sorry, that was a total accident. I saw "Scranton" and thought

The Office. My apologies. Eteethan(talk)

23:34, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Just checking in to see if you're able to continue with the review. For some reason, someone vandalized the review, but their IP/username was removed and they are unable to be identified. SounderBruce 06:34, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

@SounderBruce: First, I am SOOOOOO sorry!!! I forgot all about the review and I will complete it as soon as possible (probably tomorrow). Second, that IP was me - I was trying to complete the review but forgot to log in! Thanks, and sorry, Ethan. Eteethan(talk) 23:14, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

It's all right! I look forward to hammering out any issues you have with the article. SounderBruce 23:24, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	I have certainly noticed you around Wikipedia and I hope you enjoy this barnstar! SwisterTwister talk 03:54, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

I am writing to all those who have participated in editing this article that I have now nominated it for deletion. The discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isaiah Richardson Jr. – Voceditenore (talk) 09:17, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Because you deserve one for everything you do here. :-) (talk) (contribs) 19:14, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

(You are receiving this notice due to your having made some edits to the article discussed or its talk page sometime during its history)

In November of 2007

. This too was undone.

Throughout the history of the article, which spans more than a decade, it has never had any references. It has always been written in in-universe style. No outside universe perspective has ever been provided. As of June 2016, it will have been tagged for both of these problems for a year. I have asked, begged, and pleaded with people to rewrite this article to no avail. As the article stands (and has always stood), it continues to fail

, but this completely fails to address the failures noted. Where the content exists, either in its own article or as part of another, matters not. The issue is the content itself.

Barring a massive rewrite of the entire article into something that is encyclopedic in its treatment of the subject, I will be placing it for deletion on June 4, 2016. This notice is being sent as a last ditch attempt to find one or more people willing to do something to fix the serious problems extant in this content. Thank you for your attention, --Hammersoft (talk) 17:19, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you have listed yourself on the list of volunteers at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Volunteering#List of the DRN volunteers.

First, assistance is needed at DRN. We have recently closed a number of cases without any services being provided for lack of a volunteer willing to take the case. There are at least three cases awaiting a volunteer at this moment. Please consider taking one.

Second, this is a volunteer roll call. If you remain interested in helping at DRN and are willing to actively do so by taking at least one case (and seeing it through) or helping with administrative matters at least once per calendar month, please add your name to

will be removed from the principal volunteer list after June 30, 2016 unless the DRN Coordinator chooses to retain their name for the best interest of DRN or the encyclopedia. Individuals whose names are removed after June 30, 2016, should feel free to re-add their names to the principal volunteer list, but are respectfully requested not to do so unless they are willing to take part at DRN at least one time per month as noted above. No one is going to be monitoring to see if you live up to that commitment, but we respectfully ask that you either live up to it or remove your name from the principal volunteer list.

Best regards, TransporterMan (talk · contribs) (Current DRN coordinator) (Not watching this page) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

I wanted to thank you for reverting edits made by this IP address to Heisman Trophy winners page. It is the IP of a school... I go to that school and know the person whose name was referenced in the edit. I'm going to talk to him, but thanks for catching it. I would like to apologize on behalf of the school community for this and other vandalizing edits made by irreverent members of my class. Thanks for your time. --M0N57R0517Y (talk) 01:49, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Received this report from you. Just as an informational note, this is an IP originating from a Verizon IP pool, which is rotated on a weekly basis. I didn't do this. I don't know who did this.Bathrick (talk) 01:11, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Eteethan (talk | contribs) at 04:41, 22 November 2015 (Only warning: Personal attack directed at a specific editor on User:Penwhale. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) November 2015

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User:Penwhale, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Eteethan(talk) 04:41, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Even though I don't know you, you should take in consideration of coming back to Wikipedia with this adorable little kitten that will make anyone cry in awe. Cheers bud! Hope you feel better!

21:42, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

The page on the Honey Tree special was a complete mess. Did you not bother to read the 'production' segment, it was just explaining the short again and did NOT provide much information , making it a waste!

Totally right. My bad!Eteethan(talk) 00:42, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

No problem. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.1.5.16 (talk) 00:55, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Eteethan,

I am Hemotpaul Chaudhuri, indicated as the author of the book "Dutta Chaudhuri Chronicles". I have my own website "duttachaudhurichronicles.com".

The author of the Wiki "Dutta Chaudhuri Chronicles" is my nephew. While his intentions were good in order to honor my authorship, he should not have lifted my biodata from my website to create the Wiki page. He should not have lifted my picture from my website to add it to Wiki Commons as Hem_Chaudhuri.jpg

I am a private person. I do not like this publicity. I do not like my biodata and picture being freely projected in an open media like Wikipedia and Wiki Media. That is why I have been trying to request Speedy Deletion, but my requests are being rejected. Please help. Please delete the Wiki page and the Wiki Commons picture.Goborgunk (talk) 01:03, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Hey there! regarding the message you left on my talk page, about your undo of my edits on Daryl Gates' page. are you referring to the awards section? if so, there is a citation for this, it is in the body of the article as per guidelines. I was confused as most of the editing I did on that page was deleting material and not adding! Please let me know if you still think this information should be absent from his article and why. morsontologica (talk) 17:50, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

i didnt do any editing on grammar

Click Here: [1] Eteethan(talk) 21:52, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi Eteethan,

As an AfC reviewer you're probably aware that a new user right has been created for patrolling new pages (you might even have been granted the right already, and admins have it automatically).

Since July there has been a very serious backlog at Special:NewPagesFeed of over 14,000 pages, by far the worst since 2011, and we need an all out drive to get this back down to just a few hundred that can be easily maintained in the future. Unlike AfC, these pages are already in mainspace, and the thought of what might be there is quite scary. There are also many good faith article creators who need a simple, gentle push to the Tea House or their pages converted to Draft rather than being deleted.

Although

can occasionally be somewhat more challenging than AfC, the criteria for obtaining the right are roughly the same. The Page Curation tool is even easier to use than the Helper Script, so it's likely that most AfC reviewers already have more than enough knowledge for the task of New Page Review.

It is hoped that AfC reviewers will apply for this right at

.

(Sent to all active AfC reviewers) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

AfC Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (

) 00:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

The Center Line: Spring 2017

—delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 on 01:03, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

This terrible excuse for a human is making jokes about the dead children in Manchester and you say it ME who's not constructive??? Tb2186 (talk) 00:39, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Even if you don't like what someone is saying, you can't say things like this in an article. Eteethan(talk) 00:43, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi Eteethan, could you please provide clarification for why my edit is considered "unconstructive"? The article is flagged for having multiple issues, including content written like an advertisement. The content I removed is a list of publications where the organization is mentioned. I find this specific content to be non-encyclopedic, and feel it should not be included. Thank you. GlobalDollar (talk) 19:26, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

 Fixed This was clearly promotional; however it is often suspicious when such a large deletion is made.Eteethan(talk) 23:14, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing, Eteethan. GlobalDollar (talk) 17:09, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi Ethan,

My name is Oleg Smirnov, I am the producer of the band EXIT project whose page I was updating today. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exit_Project

Apparently, I was in the middle of my editing when you reverted the changes stating I did not edit the Edit Summary. I will do so when I am fimnished. Please kindly retore the edits I have made. I would hate to lose 2 hours of my work

Thanks Oleg Smirnov

Thank you!

-Oleg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.63.27.18 (talk) 15:17, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi Ethan,

Thanks

-Oleg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Exitproject (talk • contribs) 15:31, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Can you do anything about this guy:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/187.120.223.2

Seems all that user does is vandalize music chart numbers. I undid a few of those edits, but there are so many more. 206.16.201.81 (talk) 16:32, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.