User talk:FAAHS

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, FAAHS. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:59, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Mothparjs
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  Draft:Mothparjs, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:08, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FAAHS! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 11:08, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help Kuru😀👍🙏 FAAHS (talk) 09:21, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sir I have added and improved this article with great help of you but still that it isn't correctly shown in Google search results like other Wikipedia articles. And Sir this article is still stub-class so please let me know how can I increase its level. FAAHS (talk) 09:36, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have a response to this help desk question.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:39, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I can answer the question about Google search results. The complicated explanation is here. The simple explanation is here. It will normally take 90 days to show up on Google.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:12, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition here has again added a reference to a clearly identified Wikipedia mirror. This appears to be one of the same ones you used earlier. Additionally, this reference is to a "book" that notes "this book primarily consists of articles available from Wikipedia or other free sources online", making it also a

Sorry for my mistakes, I hadn't seen that those references were mirrors. And thank you for helping me and contributing on my article. Next time I will be more careful. And again Thank you a lot. FAAHS (talk) 08:25, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

]

Your thread has been archived

Hi FAAHS! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Request for improvement of an Article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk) 19:02, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply ]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FAAHS (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 103.7.77.79. I don't use VPN an any other proxy changing service but except that my id is blocked many times please unblock it. Thanks. FAAHS (talk) 10:06, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed P2P proxy. Yamla (talk) 10:35, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ScottishFinnishRadish was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Many of these sources do not support the prose they are used for, and are not reliable anyway. Forebears.io does not have an entry for this name, and even if it did it would not support the prose about a "famous author." The original Sanskrit texts source does not mention Sahito or Sahita anywhere I can find, and no page number is provided for the citation. The development of Buddhism source also does not mention Sahito or Sahita, and is a thesis, not a reliable source. The Payot source lists it's sourcing as Wikipedia, so is not reliable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sahito and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sahito, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:56, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that your article is not supported by the references you have provided. All these references happen to be in English. Did you know that you may provide references in any language you can read, such as Urdu? English Wikipedia prefers English references; however, if Urdu references are of better quality (e.g.,aptness, reliability), you should use them to support your article's content.--Quisqualis (talk) 20:40, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

primary schools are not necessarily notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Government Boys Primary School, Mothparja and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Government Boys Primary School, Mothparja, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 13:28, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, FAAHS. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:51, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]