User talk:GM25LIVE

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patience (George Michael song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kellymoat (talk) 14:14, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Through (George Michael song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kellymoat (talk) 14:15, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have registered as "keep" on this article. It is a single with sufficient sources. The other two to me do not appear to be singles or significant, you will need yourself to improve sourcing for the songs or they should redirect to the album. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:20, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shenmue-II-logo.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. czar 06:04, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into

sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GM25LIVE, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations

, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

General Ization ^Talk 04:40, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GM25LIVE (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Yes I admit I have use them for my own purposes but it was before I fully read all the polices of rules of WP. Im really sorry for I've did and I promise no more of these actions will ever happen. I have even admitted in a new account of my attention to start fresh (not knowing it was going to be treated as sockpuppet). I also served one week ban on my IP address and use it fully to comprehend every important WP polices and rules. I will just make one more point, I have been contribution to WP since 2007 and I had ZERO issues until just about past month which I stupidly made these mistakes. Really regret big time. I have a lot to contribute here I respectfully ask to unblock

Decline reason:

You "voted" multiple times under various names in several discussions. Did you really need to read policies to understand that votestacking would be considered ... problematic? That was not a "fresh start", and I don't see you adress what you actually did there. Huon (talk) 22:21, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GM25LIVE (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Yes I did vote twice but it wasn't suppose to be that way. I stated that I don't particularly have a main account. I log in to all my accounts randomly. If you look at my accounts you would see all of them operating since 2008 without any violation until the past month. In that particular vote discussion (which was my first), I said made a mistake and I promsided never doing it again and I'm not trying in anyway to justice it, but voted keep and told my brother to back me up in the other account, which I thought was technically fine. But it was not and turns out if I did read the policies that's would be called meatpuppet and unacceptable. Lastly, the acccounts: chargerhellcat, manhatandude and that russian are NOT me.GM25LIVE (talk) 23:22, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

User has stated they were taking the

WP:SO as per below RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:14, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thank you. Are we free to decline the unblock request on User talk:ChargerHellcat where you went out of your way, twice, to refute the claims? --Yamla (talk) 21:24, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea about that user as well as manhatan dude and oДэеюп8. Looks like somebody is trying to frame me with more suck-puppet accounts and unfortunately they have succeeded. GM25LIVE (talk) 21:37, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, @Yamla: please don't imply that I admitted to being that charger guy in his talk page. I've said before and admitted publicly I've had multiple accounts here and it didn't matter to me which account I should use as long as I log in to any one of them. I've also said sometimes I don't even bother to log in and contribute as an IP address. The accounts are GM25LIVE, Faithtour, GeorgeMichael123 (which checkuser didn't even discover), and Shenmue III. Nothing more and nothing less. Now here Im being clean and admitting all of my wrongdoings. I pledge to you, I will never repeat abuse multiple account ever and I can do community work and whatever necessary to get a second chance GM25LIVE (talk) 22:09, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GeorgeMichael123 isn't registered. PhilKnight (talk) 01:04, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It does exist but not used much. Anyway, considering there isn't much satisfaction from the admins. I guess I have decided to go with the Standard offer, I will not be editing WP until the end of the six months period. So long GM25LIVE (talk) 17:54, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Patience tracks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:26, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:HCT muscat.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]