User talk:Gazifikator
Armenian Genocide denial
See
- Please don't revert my well-sourced additions. If you think some sources are missing, please add them yourself. I've done my part by adding half a dozen; you can contribute too. --Adoniscik(t, c) 15:51, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- Stop joking. What you're doing is misinterpretation of MY own sources [1]. Your deletion of 'guerilla' is a biased POV-pushing. Did you read any of them to make your "changes"?Gazifikator (talk) 16:22, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- gaz, i didn't delete it, i moved it. you have to read. --Adoniscik(t, c) 16:31, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Im going to report you. what you're doing is permanent POV-pushing and deletion of sourced material. you add what you want to see. Gazifikator (talk) 16:34, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- Please go ahead. I'm deleting sourced material? That's a good one. Perhaps you want to move the citations after the word "guerrilla"? If so, go ahead. All I am doing is making the sentence read more naturally. Your version was stilted. I don't doubt that he leads a guerrilla movement. --Adoniscik(t, c) 16:38, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- your edits deffer from each other. you dont doubt it in the last one. i believe we need to have some principles Gazifikator (talk) 07:50, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
You made an edit to
- Please discuss you reversals of my edits of the talk) 07:37, 30 March 2009 (UTC)]
Welcome
Hello, Gazifikator, and
{{helpme}}
and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
We hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Moses of Chorene
I've been monitoring the page through my live RC feed. I'll leave a note for all editors to stay away from major content changes and stick to consensus building. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 15:29, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for the fast reply! Can I ask you also to check this editors [2] activities, I just dont know if I can notice about his edits anywhere else? He is adding unjustified tags to Armenian Genocide-related articles and pushing denialist sources. Gazifikator (talk) 15:34, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
June 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an
- Please be advised that if I see you involved in an Azerbaijan-related edit war one more time, I will sanction you under Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Amended Remedies and Enforcement. Sandstein 20:48, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- Hmmm ... One of the "usual suspects" strikes again, with his usual trumped-up charges. Gazifikator - I suggest you appeal immediately against the editing restriction. Do it while the dung is still fresh and smelly. Meowy 19:08, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks, Meowy! I afraid that I just cant take this dirty game you mentioned seriously! Should I? Gazifikator (talk) 05:06, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Bernard Lewis
The Lewis article may be a bit redundant (and is way too long as are most W articles for my taste), but I think you have erased a well written sentence and now the less well written stuff dominates the head of the article, so I have reverted your revert. Also, his work on the history of the Ottoman empire should be mentioned very early on.--Radh (talk) 08:54, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
- I really wanted to avoid any ideological clashes this time around and did not revert from my pov stance. And I really think the article could be half as long, as many more on W.. But at least his early work of the history of Turkey was well respected in academia. It is of course always good to find sources, but the Lewis book I have read on the history of the Ottoman empire was not ideological in any strong sense and he cannot have gotten his "infamous" reputation (he def has) with it. I know everything is ideological in the end etc, but I know the difference between a work of Holocaust denial and a strongly opinionated, but serious text. I will try to find a citation, but am to ignorant to really debate the things you are interested in. I just consider it rude to simply revert hotly debated things, so have tried to give a reason.--Radh (talk) 09:17, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for so detailed answer! In reality, I have not the good knowledge of his academic works on OE, I know about his late denialist works and related critics, so I'm trying to make the article more neutral. It is important to mention topics where he is obviously controversial, to not have him cited in genocide-related articles as a reliable scholar of OE. And yes, his late works are rather ideological, than academic, but many people don't see the difference. Gazifikator (talk) 04:56, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you! Perhaps you are right and Wikipedia should concentrate on the controversial stuff, the things people get upset about. But there are many people here who want this to be the new Britannica. I am all for a good fight, but it is also nice if articles are well written and also look good.
- Just had a look at a discussion page of Denial of Armenian holocaust. What a mess! Good luck to you.--Radh (talk) 06:03, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for so detailed answer! In reality, I have not the good knowledge of his academic works on OE, I know about his late denialist works and related critics, so I'm trying to make the article more neutral. It is important to mention topics where he is obviously controversial, to not have him cited in genocide-related articles as a reliable scholar of OE. And yes, his late works are rather ideological, than academic, but many people don't see the difference. Gazifikator (talk) 04:56, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Barnstar
Thanks! File:Blush.png Sardur (talk) 14:56, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Mediation Cabal: Recognition of the Armenian
See
Armenia–Turkey relations reversions
With reference to Armenia–Turkey relations, I would caution you to not be so quick to undo another editor. Edit warring is totally unhelpful. You are probably already aware of the discretionary sanctions remedy of the Armenia-Azerbaijan 2 arbitration case, but, for the purposes of this log, I attach this formal notification:
“ | The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to Armenia-Azerbaijan and related ethnic conflicts if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, including blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Final decision. | ” |
If I can be of assistance, in arbitration enforcement matters or otherwise, please contact me.
Hello mate! A new discussion was opened on the talk-page of the Armenian Genocide article for adding a new section to the Article. The proposed new paragraph is meant to be about Patriocide, along with other losses due to Genocide. Would be glad to see more contributors. Regards, Aregakn (talk) 19:26, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
New Paragraph for the Article of the Armenian Genocide: "Patriocide"
Hello mate! A new discussion was opened on the talk-page of the Armenian Genocide article for adding a new section to the Article. The proposed new paragraph is meant to be about Patriocide, along with other losses due to Genocide. Would be glad to see more contributors. Regards, Aregakn (talk) 19:27, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Parajanov.jpg
Thanks for uploading
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the
Orphaned non-free image File:Crtalaat.jpg
Hello Gazafikator, do you speak/read/write Armenian?? If yes, would you mind helping me to translate the article. --
- I'll try to be useful. By the way there are 2 good sources in English too. Gazifikator (talk) 20:15, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 9
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Makhluto (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Georgia and Sardarapat
- Henri Verneuil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Oscar
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:The trial of ASALA members in Paris, 1984.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The trial of ASALA members in Paris, 1984.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:31, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Mushegh Galshoyan
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.to help you create articles.You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
A tag has been placed on
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. George Ponderevo (talk) 14:29, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Removing Speedy at Mushegh Galshoyan
Hi Gazifikator, you recently removed a deletion tag from
Your note
I see you sate that you have rewritten Mushegh Galshoyan. However, it is my opinion that the results constitute a Close paraphrasing of the original. I've found that if I copy and paste the material, and try to rewrite it, that it still ends up too close to the original. A better approach is to find more than one source (always desirable), then, put them aside, and write about the subject in one's own words. After writing, return to the original text, and determine whether it is too close (if you have a better memory than I do), or if some points would be better made by an explicit quote and attribution, with the quote suitably short.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 21:48, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Raymond Kevorkian for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond Kevorkian until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
Thanks for creating the new article Raymond Kevorkian and for your efforts to improve the encyclopedia for the public. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:45, 28 May 2012 (UTC) ]
|
message
I left a message on User:Grandmaster's talk pages on Armenians in Azerbaijan. Sprutt (talk) 01:56, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
To Gazificator: Regarding your post today at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Armenian_Genocide&diff=495790789&oldid=495787044 you have just made a grave mistake. You posted a forgery of an edit that I did not do on the date and at the time indicated. My edit today was on in section 2.1 "The Young Turk Revolution of 1908", the last paragraph. This reflects very badly on your judgement and constitutes an unethical attempt to impeach my credentials as an editor. I did not touch line 37 in my last edit. Please take note. Diranakir (talk) 18:29, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
GAZIFICATOR: I have let Dispute Resolution Noticeboard know about the conflict you have created between us and asked for their involvement ( http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard&action=submit#editform ) Diranakir (talk) 23:16, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
- I am a volunteer clerk/mediator at ]
Nikolai Bayev
Noted your removal of Parishan's propaganda. I've got a book in Armenian that is about Armenian architects who worked in Baku, Yerevan, and Tbilisi at the turn of the 19th century. It has a chapter on Bayev if more info is needed. I can't read Armenian so it would need to be translated. Meowy 15:52, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you! It must be interesting. Do you have a scan? If yes, you can send it by e-mail (by the form "E-mail this user"). Gazifikator (talk) 16:42, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
- I got your email. Will respond. I am investigating the implications of discussing it here. Meowy 15:24, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
- I suggest that the discussion be in the context of a broader discussion about pre and post-Russian Revolution Armenian architects. There is no such Wikipedia article, so you will not be breaking your edit restriction. Meowy 16:07, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
- I got your email. Will respond. I am investigating the implications of discussing it here. Meowy 15:24, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Development of articles
Gazificator, you added a paragraph in Khojaly Massacre, which definitely improves the aerticle. I was trying to reedit your text but when you revert Grandmaster's editwarring you erase my edits already for the second time. Please be more careful. Sprutt (talk) 04:45, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
AA2
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Gazifikator. Brandmeistertalk 09:38, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Notice of topic ban
You are notified that, as a result of an
WP:AE
Please see this AE request: [4] Grandmaster 20:26, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
June 2012
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:53, 13 June 2012 (UTC)Proposed deletion of Alikhanian-Alikhanov mass spectrometer
The article
- Not notable.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kkmurray (talk) 22:51, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
The article
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see
Possibly unfree File:Alikhanian.jpg
Nomination of Ismail Shabanov for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ismail Shabanov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.