User talk:GoodWritingSolutions

Hi GoodWritingSolutions! I noticed your contributions to Lene Gammelgaard and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Happy days, ~ Lindsay^Hello 16:20, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To be fair, i did undo a couple of things you did ~ one had slightly degraded the English, the other had duplicated a link unnecessarily. On the other hand, i also formatted the reference you had added ~ though i should point out that i'm not sure the IMDB is considered a

Thank you! GoodWritingSolutions (talk) 00:07, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page.

Violating copyrights is not a good writing solution. Thank you. —Alalch E. 14:40, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I had that in a draft format, I thought, so I thought it was fine. I was not done with that work. I appreciate the feedback, however. Is it still possible for me to continue working on that as a draft? GoodWritingSolutions (talk) 00:53, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GoodWritingSolutions. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Richard C. Schwartz, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:GoodWritingSolutions. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=GoodWritingSolutions|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.  // Timothy :: talk  02:54, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not getting paid for anything like this. I'm just trying to learn how to do this because I'm...Lame? I used to be an English teacher and enjoy research. I am not being compensated for my edits. I'm just bored and this is enjoyable to me. GoodWritingSolutions (talk) 02:57, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GoodWritingSolutions is an interesting choice of username, especially considering your editing history.  // Timothy :: talk  03:20, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I used to be a teacher, so I used to give students my "Good Writing Solutions" since my last name is Good. I was going to just use my name, but Wikipedia suggested that it wasn't a good idea, so I threw back to a career I had a decade ago. I'm sorry that I have caused problems. I truly was just trying to learn here, and a lot of people have been very kind and helpful. I wrote about Richard Schwartz because I am reading one of his books per recommendation from my therapist. That's all. GoodWritingSolutions (talk) 03:22, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't know what else to do to explain things. I'm sort of flustered by this. I never even imagined that my idea to say I have "good writing solutions" would be such a to do. Maybe this isn't such a good thing for me to do I guess. It feels pretty bad. I was enjoying at the least finding punctuation errors. GoodWritingSolutions (talk) 03:25, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at

Inc. 5000

instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

No independent notability for this list / already covered in a section on the main article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Inc. 5000 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 14:15, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GoodWritingSolutions! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 14:15, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  // Timothy :: talk  02:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Excel High School (Minnesota) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails

WP:NCORP. There are no reliable independent sources for this school, which was self promoted by its author from AfC. 69.92.163.38 (talk

) 23:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the

]

Nomination of Excel High School (Minnesota) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Excel High School (Minnesota) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Excel High School (Minnesota) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:03, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Inc. 5000

request

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 20:06, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Your draft article, Draft:Inc. 5000

Hello, GoodWritingSolutions. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Inc. 5000

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:02, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]