User talk:Guekpat
Welcome!
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/50/Chocolate_chip_cookies.jpg/220px-Chocolate_chip_cookies.jpg)
Hello, Guekpat, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
- Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
- and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}}
on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! SchreiberBike | ⌨ 01:08, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- P.S. Please use edit summaries when you make a change. That's how your fellow editors know what is going on. Thank you. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 01:09, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
February 2023
Hi Guekpat! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at The Gunpowder Plot: Exploding the Legend that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. You have been marking mutliple edits as Minor when they are not, including The Gunpowder Plot and practically every article you edited February 26th and February 25th. Shearonink (talk) 19:21, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
"de" in Spanish
Hey, saw your edit at XHEAT-FM and explaining the reversion. I'm assuming this is a suggested task? The name Dolores Porras Vda. de Pérez
is a name with an abbreviation in it. Vda. is short for viuda (widow). Like "of", de is not usually capitalized in Spanish. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 01:47, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
March 2023
Hello, I'm ButterCashier. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sympathy for the Devil (Supernatural) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ButterCashier (talk) 09:25, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
National varieties of English
Hello. In a recent edit to the page Macchi C.200 Saetta, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.
For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.
In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 20:02, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Advice, tips, and suggestions
Hi Guekpat! I have been going through your recent edits and first wanted to thank you for many of your helpful edits! There are some areas that I feel you could improve on.
1. You seem to have not done it since it was mentioned, but I feel like it needs to be emphasized since there were so many edits that I think that it important to emphasize that Wikipedia’s Manual of Style (MOS) requires that straight quotes be used, and not curly quotes per the policy
2. Make sure that you do not change words or change punctuation of direct quotes.
3. Make sure that you do not unnecessarily capitalize words, especially after commas or references. Commas and references are not the end of sentences.
4. Another editor already mentioned it, but please do not switch between British and English spellings. Please see
5. You seem to be confusing certain words with similar meanings and/or spellings. Examples include "to" and "from" ([1]), "wear" and "were" ([2]), "stared" and "starred" ([3]), and "cause" and "case"([4]). Please check the definition of words if you are unsure of their meanings.
6. Make sure you maintain a
To me, your edits indicate that you are making good faith edits and appear to be
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review