User talk:HighlyLogicalVulcan

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Leonard McCoy have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the
  introduction
  .
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Leonard McCoy was changed by HighlyLogicalVulcan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.852637 on 2021-02-02T10:54:58+00:00

Thank you.

Welcome HighlyLogicalVulcan!

Sm8900 (talk) 19:33, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Carole Baskin March 2021.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to
   Di-replaceable fair use disputed
   |<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 11:49, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I just reverted your removal of the "better source needed" citation tag from the discussion of the new Theroux documentary on the

Thank you for the reply. I apologise for getting the date of the doc wrong in my edits. The date I watched it was the 5th April, but it aired the previous day. I shall only use secondary and reliable sources.HighlyLogicalVulcan 14:28, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's

Hi HighlyLogicalVulcan. I saw that you put a meme category on Michael Stevens (educator). I don't think that is correct. The meme categories are mostly for articles about specific memes. I guess it might be OK to put them on articles about people who are primarily known for being in very prominent and sustained memes but it is important to remember that people are not themselves memes and we should certainly not put those categories on articles about people who just happen to be in a meme but are mostly known for other things. In Michael Stevens' case, the article does not even mention memes, so I think that one is definitely wrong. --DanielRigal (talk) 17:52, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I agree with your points since he is best known for his informative educational videos. I won't add meme categories to pages like that, which don't mention memes in the articles themselves.--HighlyLogicalVulcan (talk) 01:06, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello HighlyLogicalVulcan. What is your relationship with the account

Per this reply you made to User:Mz7, I thought you were going to stick to one account. -- Whpq (talk) 13:39, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will from this point onwards, but had to use this one briefly as I forgot the password for NoTribbleAtAll. i have remembered it since, so this will be the final edit I make on this account. --HighlyLogicalVulcan (talk) 14:02, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Late reply but I lost access to that account completely, so will be using this one instead. --HighlyLogicalVulcan (talk) 21:59, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Rick Kirkham.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to
   Di-replaceable fair use disputed
   |<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:35, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Read the standing orders! Read them and understand them! and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 23#Read the standing orders! Read them and understand them! until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 16:46, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from British government response to the COVID-19 pandemic into Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:16, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to Michael Jackson.
The specific details of these sanctions are described here.

Broadly,

uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here

. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

TheWikiholic (talk) 15:03, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Michael Jackson into List of Michael Jackson records and achievements. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 16:55, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Now you've copied content from Bill Cosby to Bill Cosby sexual assault cases and vice versa, without attribution. You have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself, and so that the actual authors get credit. It's also required under the terms of the license. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. Please let me know if you don't understand what we have to do or why we have to do it. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:11, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I understand why we have to give attribution, and I apologise for not doing so in these two instances. I will be sure, when copying content from one page to another, to give attribution in the edit summary. --HighlyLogicalVulcan (talk) 22:43, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please include an edit summary for your edits. This helps others to understand what changes you made and why. This is even more important on high-profile pages such as Rishi Sunak... this edit added over 10,000 bytes but you gave no information about what it contained. Expecting others to look through diffs of this size is unhelpful. EddieHugh (talk) 18:48, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello HighlyLogicalVulcan! Your additions to

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:35, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I understand why we have to give attribution, and I apologise for not doing so in these two instances. I will be sure, when copying content from one page to another, to give attribution in the edit summary. --HighlyLogicalVulcan (talk) 22:43, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi

sources. As said above if you continue to copy and paste copyrighted text you are likely to be blocked. Good look with future editing Cakelot1 (talk) 07:37, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

No worries, I understand that too. So I won't copy content from copyrighted websites in any further edits. --HighlyLogicalVulcan (talk) 12:33, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings HighlyLogicalVulcan. Do you have Vulcan, Spock, Leonard Nimoy, Star Trek, and Logic in your watchlist? Thinker78 (talk) 00:31, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not at the moment. --HighlyLogicalVulcan (talk) 02:29, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Humans are not logical. How do you feel? Thinker78 (talk) 01:03, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quite illogical. --HighlyLogicalVulcan (talk) 01:05, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In case you weren't aware, the 'engine' that converts our source text into the finished wikipedia article removes excess spaces. So, if the source has redundant spaces (as I have done here), they get discarded in the public version. So you don't need to spend time correcting them.

Thank you for letting me know. --HighlyLogicalVulcan (talk) 10:20, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]