User talk:Hnpatel07

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created,

introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 04:22, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Maayka se bandi...Dhor, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

December 2010

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our

talk) 20:02, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Another problem: You may not claim what is clearly someone else's work as your own; I refer to the photos you uploaded. This is a violation of copyright. --

talk) 20:04, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to

TC 01:55, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

File permission problem with File:Picturegsdrtert35t45y6.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Picturegsdrtert35t45y6.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at

non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 01:57, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to

Aap Ki Kachehri season3 constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Ruy Pugliesi 01:58, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply
]


Speedy deletion of "File:TereMereSapneblablablaetc123.jpg"

A page you created,

copyright infringement
.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our

guide to writing your first article
.

Thank you. --

TC 02:00, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

File permission problem with File:ChandChupaBadalMeinLOGOtvserialSTARPLUS.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:ChandChupaBadalMeinLOGOtvserialSTARPLUS.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at

non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 02:02, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Kaali-EkAgniparikshaLOGOtvserialSTARPLUS.jpg

Thank you for uploading

image description page
.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. 5 albert square (talk) 02:05, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:BeheneinLOGOTVSERIALSTARPLUS.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BeheneinLOGOTVSERIALSTARPLUS.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at

non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 02:13, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vidhi Sindhwad

The article

source
that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

place reason here

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Salih (talk) 06:13, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Possibly unfree File:SabkiLaadliBeboSTARPLUStvserialLOGOslb.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SabkiLaadliBeboSTARPLUStvserialLOGOslb.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Leo 04:46, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify
their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mhiji 23:32, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify
their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of

talk) 23:49, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Copyright Problems

Hey thanx for your uploads. The file (File:MasterchefIndiaSTARPLUStvserial.jpg) licensing is a complete

patent nonsense
. If u continue to vandalize you will be blocked for editing or maybe ban from editing. This is our first and the last warning. Any questions please contact me.
User:Ajayakumaar

Rubin Jose Statham

The article

source
that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

Unreferenced bio of a living person - must have references, but hasn't.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Schwede66 08:38, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

The article

source
that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 04:53, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

The article

source
that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 04:53, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

The article

source
that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 04:56, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

The article

source
that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 04:56, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

The article

source
that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Kamkek (talk) 05:04, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

The article

source
that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Kamkek (talk) 05:07, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Possibly unfree File:RajaKiAayegiBaraatSTARPLUStvserialRKAB.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RajaKiAayegiBaraatSTARPLUStvserialRKAB.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Leyo 14:54, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Star Parivaar Awards 2010 StarPlusChannel promotionallogo.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Star Parivaar Awards 2010 StarPlusChannel promotionallogo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Leyo 14:56, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Sapnon Se Bhare Naina STARPLUS TVSERIAL.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sapnon Se Bhare Naina STARPLUS TVSERIAL.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Leyo 14:57, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Star Parivaar Awards 2010 STARPLUSchannel.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Star Parivaar Awards 2010 STARPLUSchannel.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Leyo 14:58, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:RubinJoseStathamASBtenniscentreAUCKLAND,NEWZEALANDRjS.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RubinJoseStathamASBtenniscentreAUCKLAND,NEWZEALANDRjS.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Leyo 14:59, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:BeheneinSTARPLUStvserialBeheneinsisters.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BeheneinSTARPLUStvserialBeheneinsisters.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Leyo 14:59, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:SabkiLaadlibeboTVSERIALSTARPLUS.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SabkiLaadlibeboTVSERIALSTARPLUS.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Leyo 15:00, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:MannKeeAwaazPratigyaSTARPLUSpromotionlogodfrgtse56e5t5t4645645ggg.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MannKeeAwaazPratigyaSTARPLUSpromotionlogodfrgtse56e5t5t4645645ggg.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Leyo 15:01, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:HamariDevraniSTARPLUSNewPromotionalimagebablaetc12424v542.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:HamariDevraniSTARPLUSNewPromotionalimagebablaetc12424v542.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Leyo 15:01, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

The Modest Barnstar
Thanks for your recent contributions! 129.49.72.78 (talk) 16:58, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More unsourced biographies of living persons

The following articles have been proposed for deletion as unsourced biographies of living persons. The same information as given in messages above applies to these.

talk) 15:13, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Possibly unfree File:170111121806logo.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:170111121806logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Eeekster (talk) 02:33, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Your additions to Aap Ki Kachehri- Kiran Ke Saath, Hamari Devrani, and Discover India have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:08, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted, as you did at File:170111121806logo.jpg. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:16, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article

source
that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 04:49, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

The article

source
that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Jared Preston (talk) 20:27, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of

talk) 19:50, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

2011 ITF Women's Circuit: Mumbai – Singles

What a mess. Care to look at other draw articles and make the article like them. And also remove the Indian bias.n KnowIG (talk) 01:05, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2011 ITF Women's Circuit: Mumbai for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2011 ITF Women's Circuit: Mumbai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 ITF Women's Circuit: Mumbai until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. KnowIG (talk) 09:17, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2010 ITF Women's Circuit- Hatyai for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2010 ITF Women's Circuit- Hatyai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 ITF Women's Circuit- Hatyai until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. KnowIG (talk) 09:27, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2009 ITF Women's Circuit- Delhi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2009 ITF Women's Circuit- Delhi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 ITF Women's Circuit- Delhi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. KnowIG (talk) 09:35, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of professional tennis players from India is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of professional tennis players from India until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. KnowIG (talk) 09:39, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright
infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —SpacemanSpiff 10:20, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for repeating copyright violations even after being explained the rules and being blocked for similar violations before.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —SpacemanSpiff 10:24, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So funny

I know who your sock puppet is. Bad user bad contributions — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.97.66.166 (talk) 18:26, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MasterchefIndiaSTARPLUStvserial.jpg

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).

PLEASE NOTE:


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:31, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2011 ITF Women's Circuit: Mumbai – Doubles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a non-notable $10,000 tennis tournament, fails Wikipedia:WikiProject_Tennis/Article_guidelines.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 03:51, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2011 ITF Women's Circuit: Mumbai – Singles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a non-notable $10,000 tennis tournament, fails Wikipedia:WikiProject_Tennis/Article_guidelines.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 11:47, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Devrani

The article Devrani has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Transwiki'ed but deleted from Wikitionary.
WP:NOTDICTIONARY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Train2104 (t • c) 02:44, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]