User talk:Ipodnano05/Archive 3

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:38, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I haven't replied in a few days. It's just that I've been somewhat busy lately. However, feel free to keep leaving requests since I'd rather do it all at once. Don't worry... I'll get to them eventually. TehRandomPerson^talk 04:12, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your article nomination of You're Not Sorry is currently being reviewed. There are a number of issues, please work to correct them as soon as possible, once they are corrected i will being the prose review. Any questions of concerns please reach me on my Talk Page =). ..:CK:.. ^(talk2me) 03:34, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I noticed WILAY didn't have a sample, and thought I'd get your opinion before I make one for it. What section do you think would be best? The piano half, or the electric guitar half? Should it have the "Don't you know? / You're beautiful" in it? liquidluck✽talk 02:04, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I asked User:TehRandomPerson to make an ogg sample for "When I Look at You" and so first I would need to tell him it is taken care of. Quite frankly, I believe you should find a common place between the second chorus, the line "Don't you know? / You're beautiful", and the electric guitar solo. Two of those three things are spoken of in the "Composition" section. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 02:11, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can't include both "Don't you know" and part of the chorus within 24 seconds. I can get either "you appear just like a dream to me" + "you're beautiful" + guitar solo, or guitar solo + chorus. Which do you think would be better? liquidluck✽talk 02:31, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can also take care of You're Not Sorry and Change (and any other TS song) if you want. Just let me know which sections you'd like! liquidluck✽talk 02:36, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chorus and guitar solo sounds good. For "You're Not Sorry", as much of the begging and the chorus you can include and chorus. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 02:51, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand this edit. Those charts were produced using {{

Per WP:Record charts, once an article has been upgraded to use the macros, that change should not be reverted. If the other Miley Cyrus articles haven't been upgraded yet, someone will get to them eventually. Your edits had resulted in the chart table being in two places, so I folded them together, using the macros.—Kww(talk) 22:33, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't like the single chart format and I know it's my own preference but I'd rather for have the original way. It says you can in several occasions and, please, I beg of you, to leave it as the original charts. Plus, Norway isn't backed up. I looked on Norwegiancharts.com and the song has not charted yet. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 22:36, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you have an objection, then explain it to me. I will either fix it, or make you understand why it is the way it is. Just removing them isn't the answer.—Kww(talk) 22:42, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just do not think it's visually appealing or organized. The original provides the same information in a better method, for me. It's definitely more comprehensible, both toward readers who are experienced users, IPs, do not know much about the music industry, and do know about the music industry. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 22:47, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's not very specific. It's certainly organized: every chart is listed as "country (chart)", with a clickable link to specify which chart is used, and a reference to support it. Contrast that to something like "Dutch Singles Chart", where there is nothing at all to explain which of the five commonly used singles chart in the Netherlands the entry is for.—Kww(talk) 22:51, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If there are five, then it would be specified which one and who is the provider with a link to it. So if people are interested enough, they can see and read more about it. As where there you have no option and most people are left reading things they probably do not care about. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 23:00, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I really didn't understand how that differs from what you get with the macro for the two supported charts, Dutch40 and Dutch100. How would you format it differently so that you would tell people it was from the Netherlands and which chart it was? You can look at articles in Category:singlechart usages for Dutch40 and Category:singlechart usages for Dutch100 for examples of how it's done today (and note how easy it is to categorize the articles, something you could never manage manually).—Kww(talk) 23:09, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So, you say the name of the complete chart. Dutch Top 40 or Dutch Top 100. Not a big deal and what use does that categorization have? -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 23:21, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, Wikipedia:Record charts gives you the option to use single chart format or the original. I chose to use the original in the article. There's nothing wrong with that since the original format is also approved by the guidelines. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 23:25, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Record charts#Chart macros:"Although the macros are not compulsory they are not to be reverted if they have been upgraded."

The categorization is pretty handy for maintaining articles. When Hungary moved all of its charts, I was able to fix all the ones using the macros in a couple of edits. Never have been able to fix all the ones that link manually. I'm still perplexed: are you objecting to including the country name separately? It would be nearly impossible to handle the US and the UK without doing that.

Note that I'm really not trying to harass you. It's important to me that people accept the macros, and I still haven't figured out how to overcome some of the objections. It's really hard to have a consistent format for all countries that doesn't wind up leaving information out. So far, you haven't been specific enough in your objection that I can change anything to make you happier without breaking something else.—Kww(talk) 23:30, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I do not like how the country and the provider such as ARIA is separated. I find it completely useless. If macros left the original format's look, I would have absolutely no problem with it. The singles chart format, to me, looks odd and out of place. If you can find a way to do that, then that would be absolutely wonderful. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 23:36, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've got a discussion going on with Legolas2186, who has some problems with the reference formatting. Once I'm done with that, I'll take it back to WT:Record charts and we can hash it out. Changing the format is easy once I get people to agree what it should be.—Kww(talk) 23:43, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. That's pretty cool an I have a question. Two charts listed in the table do not have references. Is it supposed to be like that? Also, for now, can I leave the Can't Be Tamed article with the original format? -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 23:48, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What doesn't have a reference?—Kww(talk) 23:50, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, nevermind, while editing it there seems to be no reference but one automatically appears in the article. I think I'm against this too. It would be better if editors were able to freely format the citation by themselves as people have their preferences, which should maintain cohesive with the rest of the article. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 23:55, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We can talk about that when I take it back to WT:Record charts too, but if that's removed it defeats the whole purpose: the goal is to have it so that when websites change URL formats we can fix all the references at once by changing the macro. If it doesn't create the reference, it doesn't do that at all.—Kww(talk) 23:58, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, but right now, is there a way to format it yourself if possible? There should probably be a way where it's automatic but changeable if one wanted to. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 00:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not that I can think of. Look at the source at {{

singlechart}}, and I think you can see why it can't get too much more complicated.—Kww(talk) 00:05, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Oh God. Is there a way that is possible though? For right now, can I change the single chart format to the original for the article. At least meanwhile we discuss all of this. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 00:11, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd rather you didn't, but I can't use administrative powers to prevent you.—Kww(talk) 00:15, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comprehensiveness! Its just until we can sort out this whole thing. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 00:26, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion open at WT:Record charts#Chart template formats.—Kww(talk) 21:16, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, whatever you think of the templates, don't do this, where you replaced properly sourced information with an unsourced link because of your distates for the template.—Kww(talk) 21:18, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relax, I was adding source but my Internet crashed before I could. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 21:26, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm sorry that you're having difficulties with the talk page. I made a new, brief reply there to test it out and it worked fine. Maybe it was just a temporary issue of some kind; I don't know why it would not let you make edits. Here's the link again in case you need it.  Gongshow ^Talk 00:09, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I'm not sure, that's definitely odd, because as far as I can tell anyone should be able to make edits on that page. I do see that you had left a couple comments there earlier, so it must have happened sometime after that? Anyway, if you still have trouble, just go ahead and edit the article itself...you can always reach me at my talk page and I can cross out stuff on the GA talk page as each issue is resolved.  Gongshow ^Talk 00:25, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The bullet points on the GA talkpage are each preceded by three colons. I hope this helps. Regarding the Allmusic quote, I understand what you're saying about the paragraph's content being related. The first half - "Even though the title Hannah Montana 2/Meet Miley Cyrus seems a little self-defeating, it's true that the songs Cyrus sang as herself on the first soundtrack weren't especially memorable, so in a way her part of the set is a second chance to make a first impression. This time, the sound and the songs are better" - is evaluating the quality of the album as a whole (i.e., the songs collectively), and not any song in particular. That's exactly the kind of analysis I expect to read about in the

Hannah Montana 2/Meet Miley Cyrus

article, but not individual articles on each of the album's 20+ songs. But maybe there's a way to still get this idea across (see below).

For the second half of the quote - "several tracks, such as 'GNO (Girls' Night Out)' and 'I Miss You,' could easily be Hannah Montana songs, but Cyrus' singing is lower and throatier, and the arrangements are more organic and rock-oriented" - I agree that this can be appropriately referenced in the "I Miss You" article; just reworked a little. Perhaps something like, "Heather Phares of Allmusic complimented 'I Miss You' among several tracks on the album that she felt "could easily be Hannah Montana songs, but Cyrus' singing is lower and throatier, and the arrangements are more organic and rock-oriented". This helps keep the focus on the song, while still illustrating what the reviewer said makes it distinct from those of Hannah Montana, and also conveys that the reviewer had a favorable opinion of the song (from the first half of the quote).  Gongshow ^Talk 23:14, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Great! I'm glad we came together on this; I went ahead and put a strike though it.  Gongshow ^Talk 00:04, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Okay, moving on to the "Original research" comments. The first point is that the beginning of the "Background" section states that the song "incorporates pop rock and soft rock elements". The source does not mention this. I know it would be awkward to write the "arrangements are more organic and rock-oriented" again, but how does that equal pop rock or soft rock? Or is there something else in the link that shows that the song incorporates elements of those genres?
• The third point - How do we know from the picture that it's a sky? To me it just looks like a light-blue background along with some heads and shadows. Maybe there's a picture that makes it more obvious; if not, maybe the sentence doesn't need anything else after "December 20, 2007".
• The fourth point - Here is the quote from the Boston Globe article: "She sings and dances ably enough, and her tunes (she writes, too, including one song poignantly dedicated to her late grandfather) surpass much of what's heard on Radio Disney." This does not equal "'I Miss You' surpasses much of what's heard on Radio Disney", and should not be expressed as such. It's a subtle distinction; the writer's mention of "I Miss You" is only in the context of informing readers that Miley writes songs. The parenthetical reference to the song is an independent statement from the writer's claim that Miley's songs (collectively) surpass much of what's heard on Radio Disney.
• The fifth point - Maitland McDonagh of TV Guide described the song as "a vague rocker-chick grab". First, the quote is incorrect - it's "vaguely rocker-chick garb". Second, it's a description of clothing, not the song. It's fine to mention this, but make sure it's clear that the reference is to the outfit Miley's wearing during the performance of the song in the film. Regarding the song itself, the description in the source is that "she sings about...how much she loved her grandfather".  Gongshow ^Talk 01:24, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Great work on the changes! Everything looks good, and I liked your suggestion regarding the fourth point, so I went ahead and edited the sentence to something similar to your example. Take a look and let me know if it's okay with you.  Gongshow ^Talk 03:43, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, thanks for handling all my questions and comments so quickly and effectively. I am happy to pass the article. Congrats!  Gongshow ^Talk 05:14, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! I know what you mean, it must have seemed like my feedback was as long as the article, haha. But I give you a lot of credit for your efforts; it was a really nice article to begin with, especially for a more "obscure" Miley song. It just needed a few finishing touches! Thanks again for collaborating so well together on this. Take care,  Gongshow ^Talk 05:29, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ipodnano05. You have new messages at Liquidluck's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Ipodnano05. You have new messages at Liquidluck's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Ipodnano05. You have new messages at Liquidluck's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Ipodnano05. You have new messages at Liquidluck's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Ipodnano05. You have new messages at Liquidluck's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your article nomination of Fearless is currently being reviewed. There are a number of issues, please work to correct them as soon as possible, once they are corrected i will being a more thorough review and then begin the prose review. Any questions of concerns please reach me on my Talk Page =). ..:CK:.. ^(talk2me) 00:26, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You left a comment on my talk page saying done, i guess you didnt notice i added like 5 more issues under "Alright going through more :" lol. Please fix those too :) ..:CK:.. ^(talk2me) 04:47, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Im glad my comment made you laugh :). Ive left a couple responses on the review page, once those are done please drop me a message :). Everything is pretty much done except "Background" which i will be bold and fix myself once your done so we avoid edit conflicts. (Nothing major just a few tweeks are needed, grammer and proper sentence ends, no biggy, ill do it so we can avoid more back and forth and i can just pass the article). ..:CK:.. ^(talk2me) 04:14, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, i believe we are done, ive corrected a few things under Chart Performance and Background. I now believe it passes, Great Work! ..:CK:.. ^(talk2me) 05:27, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ipodnano05, the language on this user's profile is almost verbatim to yours :D – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 08:32, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, that's embarrassing. I think I might have looked at his while doing mine. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 00:31, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article He Could Be the One you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:He Could Be the One for eventual comments about the article. Well done!. Tbhotch^{Talk C.} 03:44, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ipodnano05, Your article nomination of Who Said is currently being reviewed, there are a few issues, nothing major. Please work to correct them as soon as possible.
On another note please do not write on the review page, instead please message me if you have any questions comments or concerns, or if you are done, i would prefer this because our reviewing of Fearless got really long :S. Thank you :) (CK)Lakeshade✽talk2me 22:30, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Woot Woot! I figured out how to upload audio. =D Its been added to Who Said. (CK)Lakeshade✽talk2me 04:55, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your Nomination of Who Said has passed. All my concerns have been addressed and i failed to find any other errors in the article. Great Work, look forward to reviewing your articles in the future! If you need any more audio files please dont hesitate to ask me since i now know how. =D (CK)Lakeshade✽talk2me 05:57, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ipodnano05. You have new messages at Liquidluck's talk page.
Message added 03:52, 15 June 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Matthewedwards :  Chat  20:59, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! I'll do my best. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 23:54, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:37, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! I'll do my best. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 23:54, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I didn't realise I'd been beaten to the template! That'll teach me not to pay attention to my watchlist! I'm sure you;;l do all right with it, anyway. :) Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:08, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Haha. O.K. And truth be told, I'm not very aware what this is all about. Do you mind explaining? :) -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 00:13, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ooh, I just checked your log and it looks like I beat Matthew to actually granting the right! ;) Basically, they're rolling out "pending changes" (a euphemism for flagged revs) which means that when IPs and newly registered editors edit certain pages, an admin (like me! Yay! :D) or a reviewer (like you! Yay! :D [I'm easily amused!]) has to approve the edit before it can be seen by most readers. The idea is to screen out vandalism, BLP issues/libel, copyvios and other crap that needs to be gotten rid of quickly. the gory details on exactly how it works are at

WP:PEND and its associated pages- I think they're putting a few pages in the WP space aside for testing before it's rolled out completely. That help? :) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:27, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Lol! you made me laugh. And it helps lot, thanks! -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 00:31, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I can't really do the audio for you this time. I tried, but I couldn't at this time. TehRandomPerson^talk 03:10, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, i will try to review the album if no one gets to it in the next week. I gave it a quick scan, here are some errors i came across below. (CK)Lakeshade✽talk2me 01:24, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Dablinks per Scott Campbell. See Personal  Done

• Personal Section endash is incorrect. There too big, see The Fame to see how to fix.

• Tracklisting needs references for each different listing.

• No they do not as most GA and FA albums don't have this. In fact, pretty much a 99% percent of them don't like In Rainbows, Control (Janet Jackson album), Intimacy (Bloc Party album), Thriller (album), and countless more. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message}  Done

• There are some Reference
  MOS
  violations, italics where there shouldnt be, and no italics where they should be.

• Where? -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 01:42, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Well Nevermind then, they have been corrected, last time i counted there were 10, i cant find any now. (CK)Lakeshade✽talk2me 02:54, 19 June 2010 (UTC)  Done[reply]

• aCharts is used throughout the article, they need to be removed and replaced.
  Good Charts states "Good and Featured class articles should not rely on unlicensed archives as convenience links, and should use official sites and licensed archives where possible." (CK)Lakeshade✽talk2me 01:24, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• "Overall, Breakout is dominant on pop rock but explores through a variety of other musical genres." Removed where striked out. (CK)Lakeshade✽talk2me 01:24, 18 June 2010 (UTC)  Done[reply]

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:25, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Ipodnano05. You have new messages at Liquidluck's talk page.
Message added 07:43, 21 June 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Singlechart

Enough with this. Please stop reverting additions of the singlechart template. It works fine, all problems with the references it creates have been corrected, and reverting it is simply disruptive. There's no reason to revert them.—Kww(talk) 23:59, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Singlecharts at You Belong with Me.

I don't know if you aware but you have breached a wikipedia policy multiple times by the remove the {{

WP:Ownership. regards, Lil-unique1 (talk) 00:01, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

I'm sorry but as I have discussed over a million of times, the article has to be consistent and it already is composed with the original format. If people spoke in the talk page about it then I wouldn't have to revert it. That way everyone can talk about it. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 00:05, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine but what we're dealing with here is a change in policy. Policy on WP:record charts is that the template is preferred over the original format for the very reasons stated above. That policy was voted on and implemented. The idea behind "once implemented singlechart templates should not be reverted" is that it takes time to implement. Like I said previously your personal preference does not overide wikipedia policy. Johnfrompickney, Kww and I are all in favor of the singlechart template and have all spoken to you about not removing it from the article. If you are unhappy with that then it is you that needs to seek consensus change on the template's talkpage because currently the consensus supports the use of singlechart. Btw because of the nature of the template it does not need discussion before an article is converted from manual referencing to singlechart because it was implemented as policy. Once in place it should not be removed. Regards, Lil-unique1 (talk) 00:09, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that those are the rules. And I beg to disagree, the article is found on the original version (which is acceptable by WP:Charts so it's not like it's prohibited or strongly opposing against it. If the WP:Charts has it, than it could be used in the article). Anyways, if people see that the article has not been updated than they should warn editors about it through the talk page to make sure no one has an issue with it. Since "once implemented singlechart templates should not be reverted", as you said, people should be extra careful with it. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 00:29, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's been completely converted and is now internally consistent.—Kww(talk) 05:05, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WHAT!? OMG I just saw it and it's hideous and the references are so distorted. They don't have correct publishers, works, or even accessdates. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 05:24, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Accessdates have been added. To the best of my knowledge, all works and publishers are correct: if you have an issue with any of them, please specify what your problem is specifically, and I'll correct the template if consensus is that you are correct. The reference formats have been reviewed multiple times by multiple people. You were invited to the discussion, and chose not to participate.—Kww(talk) 05:40, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Digital Spy

This was approved as a reliable source, I'm going around adding it where possible. It's been discussed more than five times at the reliable sources noticeboard, which no one contested it's reliability... some links from a search - [1], [2] and [3] ([4]) RAIN the ONE (Talk) 11:07, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

These are also numerous discussions that deem it unreliable. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 23:06, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Funny looking screen

I don't mind you asking, but I really don't know. WP:Help desk is a better place to ask.—Kww(talk) 04:01, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Party in the USA Cover.jpg

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:19, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hannah Montana 2 Meet Miley Cyrus front cover.jpg

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:19, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Miley Cyrus - The Climb cover.jpg

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:32, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Swift "Love Story" single cover

Hi Ipodnano05, I noticed you uploaded a new version of the "Love Story" single cover from Taylor Swift; one had already existed on Wikipedia. I notice that the only difference was that the file was in PNG format and had slightly better quality. For minor issues such as this, perhaps it would just be better to upload a new version of the original file? There is an option to do so at the bottom of every file page on wiki. You could have uploaded the version with updated quality (the JPG to PNG change wouldn't work but it isn't much of a difference) and then there wouldn't be duplicates of copyrighted files existing. (It will take a week for the original file to be deleted.) I won't bother replacing the new file with the old one as that is unnecessary, but just a heads-up for the future! :) –

Chase (talk) 05:32, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image File:HannahMontanaMovieSoundtrack.JPG

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:36, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Taylor Swift - TodayFairytale.jpg

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:40, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Miley Cyrus - Time of Our Lives.jpg

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:42, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Breakout album cover.jpg

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:45, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

Hello, Ipodnano05. You have new messages at HJ Mitchell's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- :) 00:16, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Swiftholiday.jpg

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:11, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Taylor Swift - You Belong with Me.png

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:42, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey :)

What was that GAN you wanted me to look at a while ago? Do you still need me to look at it? I've been a bit busy lately with admin stuff, but I'm trying to get back into more interesting stuff like GA reviewing and article writing now. :) I'm watching you, so you can just reply here to save yourself an edit! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:45, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes and it's breakout. Thank you. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 21:36, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Breakout (album) I take it? I've added it to my watchlist and my to-do list, so I'll try to at least make a start over the next few days. :) Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:28, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your

GA nomination of Today Was a Fairytale

The article

good article criteria, but there are a few changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within one week, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. Tbhotch^{Talk C.} 02:11, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Your

GA nomination of Today Was a Fairytale

The article Today Was a Fairytale you nominated as a good article has passed ; see the talkpage for eventual comments about the article. Well done! Tbhotch^{Talk C.} 19:21, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your

GA nomination of Breakout (album)

The article

Adabow (talk) 22:29, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image File:Miley Cyrus Fly On The Wall.png

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:31, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Our Song (song) is on hold

The article

good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. Good luck :) (CK)Lakeshade✽talk2me 18:50, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

I will go through the article more thoroughly in a little while, for thee most part it looks great. It doesnt have an audio sample, do you need one? Ill upload one if needed (CK)Lakeshade✽talk2me 23:21, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your

GA nomination of Got the Life

The article

good article criteria, but there are many changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within one week, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. CrowzRSA 15:11, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Albums & EPs

I have an idea of merging the album section and the EP section into one. Reasons are:

1. Albums and EPs are both collection of tracks
2. EPs appear in all Billboard album charts.
3. If bonus tracks are included in an EP, is it still an EP? (e.g. 1 or 2 bonus tracks added to a 8-track EP; see The Fame Monster.)

It is a new idea and it hasn't been use anywhere yet. Please do not included this as a reason. An example can be seen here. Please add responses here. Thank you. Langdon (talk) 20:20, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am strongly against this. That page doesn't seem too clean but the idea, I think, is kind of bad. Even if you do add (EP) right next to it, some people might get confused. The infobox has albums and EPs separate and I think we should too. The first point doesn't seem valid because a collection is more like a compilation album, and if you put that that way every album is a collection of tracks. Sure, EPs and albums both appear on the Billboard 200. Then again, so do compilations, soundtracks, live album, remix albums, and so many more. The last point is very interesting, like Miranda Cosgrove's Sparks Fly. In that case, it all depends on what the label says it is. But this isn't the case with any of the Taylor EPs. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 20:27, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

I'll look at the review page, and sure I can review "Breathe", consider it done. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:46, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading an image that already existed?

Uh, what was the point of replacing File:Can't Be Tamed.jpg by uploading the exact same thing yesterday with File:Miley Cyrus - Can't Be Tamed.png? The PNG format doesn't enhance a raster image in any way. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 17:21, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The PNG format is of way better resolution. The jpg format was kind of weird looking on the article. It looks way better now. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 19:15, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Miley Cyrus - Fly On The Wall.png

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:28, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hannah Montana soundtrack.png

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:39, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your

GA nomination of Party in the U.S.A.

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Edge3 (talk) 21:08, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Holiday albums

Hi! see:

• Template talk:Infobox album/Archive 5#Give holiday album its own type parameter?
• Template talk:Infobox album/Archive 4#Holiday album sub-type
• Template talk:Infobox album/Archive 2#Holiday releases.
  

-J04n(talk page) 00:49, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Best of both worlds concert cd cover.jpg

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:48, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ordinarygirl.jpg

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:56, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hannah Montana - Supergirl.jpg

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:18, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

singlechart

Just wanna let you know that singlechart does have access dates. Nowyouseemetalk2me 03:58, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Singlechart templates

Please don't ever do this again. If you can ever gain consensus on a different appearance for {{

singlechart}}, I'll happily help implement it. Trying to justify your actions by using false edit summaries (as you did here, where you should note that the template calls all had the "accessdate" parameter filled out) is inexcusable.—Kww(talk) 04:20, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

People revert you because the manual charts are more difficult to maintain. Whenever the URLs change (which they do occasionally: Hungary changed a while back, and we never have recovered from the last Billboard change), every one of your manual chart entries has to be updated by hand. The ones using {{

singlechart

}} can all be changed at once in a central location. Further, it makes sure that the citations are correctly formatted, consistent, and aiming at a reliable source. Reasons like that are far stronger than your personal preference. I've encouraged you before, and I'll encourage you again to try to get a consensus to change any portion of the template that you don't care for, but if you can't get consensus for your desired changes, don't just try to revert.

We are only a few months away from being able to monitor {{

singlechart}} for vandalism and updates automatically. There's a beta chart generator at http://www.pinkbeachproperties.com/chartsearcher/index.php

that can create the chart tables for people. I need to add a few more charts (including Billboard) and update the UK information, but it's close. Once that's done, I'll add chart validation (I have a private beta for that, but it's too buggy still). When that's complete, I'll fire it up as a bot, and chart vandalism will be automatically detected and reverted, and songs popping up on new charts that they aren't currently on will be pointed out automatically. Couple that with being able to be updated when the sites change, and you have a robust system for charts. Manual formatting just doesn't even compare.

I think that once the whole system is in place, the consensus will change from "don't revert singlechart macros" to "don't tolerate manual charts at all".—Kww(talk) 20:31, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No one is asking you to use the template, just not to revert it once someone else does. That's a big difference. I'm sorry that you don't have any more constructive criticism than "crap", and I don't really care what you may volunteer to do. No one could force you to keep your promise, so it isn't worth much.—Kww(talk) 20:51, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You don't own any articles. None. Any changes made by another person are that person's responsibility, not yours. If an article you like has singlechart templates in it, that in no way is forcing you to use it. As for your concerns, you never achieved a consensus that your prefererences were better than what was currently there. I'm pretty responsive to things that people point out as errors, and will make any changes that there is a consensus to do. The guideline states not to revert in order to keep personal preferences from interfering with construction of a reliable and maintainable charting system. Certainly you understand that relying on individual editors to maintain individual articles is less reliable than having a centralised and consistent system? You do also realise that you will outgrow Miley Cyrus someday, and won't have any strong interest in maintaining articles about her, don't you?

As for your second question, there's no reason to revert to the manual version. Being right today doesn't mean it will be right tomorrow or next week, and there's no reason to take the article backwards and make it take extra work to correct. It really isn't a question of "if", it's a question of "when". No website lasts forever, no website keeps the same format forever. All the references in every song article on Wikipedia will have to change someday, and it's only reasonable to prepare for that day, not ignore it.—Kww(talk) 21:06, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hannah Montana (season 1 DVD).png

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:18, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Start-All-Over2.jpg

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:41, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hannahmontanaforeverofficialcover.jpg

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:43, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Readysetdontgo.jpeg

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:44, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MileyCyrus2009Tour.jpg

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:40, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:OurSongSingle.jpg

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:39, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hoedown.JPG

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:41, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE:PITU Review

Thanks for making the fixes. I've added a few more issues to the review page. Candyo32 19:51, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I left something about the image on the review page. Candyo32 22:02, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well 300x300 is still the max for NFC. I think the size for two screencaps can still be acceptable, as seen here. Other than that, I'm checking back over the article one more time. Candyo32 22:17, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thanks. One more thing then everything can be closed. Could you fix the ref for the sheet music as seen in the FA,

4 Minutes (Madonna song)? Candyo32 22:27, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Okeydokey, thanks, and congratulations on your latest GA. Your work to the Miley/Hannah, T-Swizzle, and other articles are greatly appreciated. Keep up the good work! Candyo32 22:34, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Unreasonable reasons"?

Why did you make this rash edit to

WP:CHARTS. For another, your Talk page is littered with the remains of previous admonishments on the matter. You should know that such a significant revision in those circumstances requires that you develop consensus for it first, and it does not appear that you did. And I have to say, your explanation in the edit summary is both vague and opaque. What are "unreasonable reasons"? — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 22:40, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Keeping it after someone added without consensus because the guidelines say that you shouldn't revert it is completely unreasonable. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 22:49, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Both display the same information in the charts. However, singlecharts' references are not correct. While it is useful to have them for articles that are unmaintained, here it is not needed. Please leave it original because I'm not backing down. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 22:53, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

interjection, which part of the references are incorrect? -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 23:14, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)The consensus is to encourage the use of the templates (for reasons already explained to you). The addition of templates (by whomever did it) would have been in accordance with that consensus.

The consensus is also to discourage the removal of the templates. In this situation, your removal is what might be called "unreasonable", since it is the action against the consensus. (The next step in my logical argument is to drag in some links proving why consensus is the foundation of WP, etc., but we'll skip that, shall we?)

Now, you say they both show the same information. If that were so, there'd be no good argument for changing (at least on that basis), as it'd be just a waste of time (and an unneeded addition to the revision history, as well as a lot more added code in the article). But in fact, your removal changed things. I haven't gone back to study and compare everything, but one thing I noticed before I reverted your edit was that you invented a completely new name for the European chart. With that example, we already have a good reason for preferring {{

singlechart

}} to the manual way you inexplicaly prefer.

And here's the biggie, you say that "singlecharts' references are not correct." This is a bold and frightening statement, and calls for immediate action. In what respect, specifically, are they incorrect? The template is used many, many places, so if something's wrong with it, we need to fix it pronto. This is a big deal.

Finally, your closing sentence indicates your willingness to work cooperatively in good faith on the collaborative project that is Wikipedia, and I am inspired to adopt the same perspective as you. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 23:18, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's a personal decision. The title isn't like on the site and the work and publisher parameters are not how they should be. I have already discussed this in the template's talk page and they are still they same. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 23:42, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You might have provided links to simplify my search, but I have read your reply with care, and found the following:

• At the very end of
  a test reports thread
  , you added some quick notes in June, including, "The work should be the website like for example Charts.org.nz, Hitparade.ch, and so on." You also said, "the publishers should have the actual chart provider."
• You started
  another thread
  a few hours later, beginning with "The work and publisher parameters are incorrect. For the work of Hung Medien sites, it should be the website's name and the publisher should be the actual chart owner, not Hung Medien. For example the Australian Singles Chart would have Australian Recording Industry Association as a publisher." This incited an animated discussion in which you unfortunately participated relatively little. You were in any case unable to shift the consensus of that group to your opinion.

Is that what you are referring to?

I believe Kevin (Kww) decided to keep the explicit mention of the Web site out of the generated ref on the principle that it's in the linked URL already, and very often mentioned in the title shown (all the Hung Medien sites do this, for example). He's also tried to find a compromise solution to say something about the work, in a somewhat more broad sense, so the generated refs have some meaning to readers and are easier to to differentiate from each other.

Take a look at the refs at the bottom of

Nielsen Business Media

).

I can't say I agree with your point that the publisher shown in the ref should be the body that originally came up with the publishable data. If anything, that body would be the equivalent of author, but Kevin took that out to satisfy the consensus against it. It's clear to me, at least, that when we point to australian-charts.com as the source of our Aussie peaks info, the publisher is the owner/controller of that site (Hung Medien), and not the organization that compiled it (ARIA).

I would, personally, prefer that the refs had the Web site listed right before the publisher. However, I've learned to live with that for the time being, knowing that

consensus can change

, and if a discussion could lead to (yet another) sweeping change of the template in that direction, then I'd be happier, and all the articles which use the template would be "improved" in one fell transclusion. But first we'd have to get consensus to support such a change.

Finally (finally!), you mention above that "the title isn't like on the site". Here, you've lost me, as I don't know what you mean. Kevin is very exacting about the title, even down to using the hyphens that properly should be dashes. He's taken a lot of rude remarks for that, so if you now don't think the titles are correct, it's a big surprise to me. But maybe you could be even more precise in your complaint? In the meanwhile, though, I believe removing these templates (apart from going against the guideline) has more negative effects than positive. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 01:29, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you can point me an example where the title generated by {{

singlechart}} doesn't match the title on the website, I will fix it immediately. As John says, I'm scrupulous about that, and any mismatch is an error.—Kww(talk) 07:17, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

File:Hannah Montana The Movie poster.png

Regarding this edit to Hannah Montana: The Movie, the reason I didn't tell you to reduce the image size, or tag it with {{non-free reduce}}, is that I tried reducing it myself and came up with exactly the issue we have now, that File:Hannah-montana-movie-poster.jpg is now sharper and with more true colouring than File:Hannah Montana The Movie poster.png. (PNG is a borrible format). As a secondary point, I have to question the license of File:Hannah Montana The Movie poster.png. It's tagged as being a cover of an audio recording, but it's clearly a movie poster. --AussieLegend (talk) 22:43, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What was the reason for this edit? In this edit you complained that there was "no reason to replace image with the worst one available" and that's exactly what your edit has done. --AussieLegend (talk) 22:55, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was just trying to be flexible. I know you don't have to warn me or do anything of the sort. Sorry for trying to be nice. The jpg format is bad. If by "sharp" you mean sketchy, then it is. Plus, since when is Miley orange? That image is more than horrible and I think anyone would agree with me. I have corrected the licensing on the new one. PNG is much better format. It's more clear. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 22:54, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? That is the best one out there. Anyways, I really don't want to keep going at this. Let's put it up for vote in the talk page since it's clearly just a preference matter consensus does not have to be reached. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 22:57, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Try looking at the two images next to each other. The text in File:Hannah-montana-movie-poster.jpg is easier to read, it's not out of focus like the text in File:Hannah Montana The Movie poster.png. To be honest, the best image would be a combination of the two. --AussieLegend (talk)

I tried it and I will admit the jpg format is a little bit easier to read. The difference is not by much and it's just a couple of words, which are not the main focus of the image. Therefore, the PNG format is better because Miley is seen more clearly and in the right colors. Please don't try to convince me because my mind is made up and I am 100% sure we are getting nowhere with this conversation. Sorry for being rude. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 23:10, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've examined all versions and the jpg version is a faithful reproduction of the source image. That's what we should be using, not a manipulated version. As for your mind being made up, please remember,

you don't own the images or the article. --AussieLegend (talk) 23:13, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

I'm not saying that what I say goes. It's just that you can't change my mind. I beg to defer because png is the best duplication of the actual image. With album covers, it seems exactly the same. With posters, it should too. In fact, it does. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 23:25, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't find your argument that "png is the best duplication of the actual image" convincing in this case because the png version is most definitely not a faithful reproduction, as evidenced by the difference in the colours between the source and the png version and out of focus text. --AussieLegend (talk) 23:31, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Its way better than jpeg which shows sketchiness and vibrant colors that were not there to begin with. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 23:33, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Any image editing program can change colours. It's not the png conversion process that resulted in your image colours being different to the original. --AussieLegend (talk) 00:09, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hannah Montana The Movie poster.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered,

Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 23:48, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image File:ChangeTaylorSwiftSingle.jpg

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:41, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Taylor Swift - White Horse.jpg

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:46, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to comment: Formatting changes to

WP:DISCOGSTYLE

.

Hail and well met! I'm not sure where we stand on the topic of singlechart formatting, but I think it's important that we discuss big changes and try to work up a consensus. Some changes to discography table styling are about to be implemented (adopted), and I'd like to know what objections you might have before people start following the new guideline. Do you have some time to leave a comment?

Quick summary: Over at the

FL

status, since they don't conform to the MoS.

After much discussion at

here (already changed from its earlier form

). Column order and formatting would be noticeably changed, chart headings would typically be bigger, a few other differences in the coding would be made.

The only hold-up (as far as we know) is lack of wider consensus; I think too few people have participated and I'd like to see more editors register their opinion (be it support or criticism) before we move ahead with a rather significant change. (At the very least, you may consider this fair warning.) Your comment is welcome at Are we ready to apply this updated guideline?. Thanks. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 10:56, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Ordinary Girl" european cover/Sorry

Hey Ipod, there is a European cover for Hannah Montana's "Ordinary Girl" here is [the alternate cover] for the song. Would you mind Uploading the cover as an alternate cover for "Ordinary Girl"? It would mean so much to me. Oh and sorry about all the Hannah Montana stuff I have been editing. You really know more about Hannah and Miley Cyrus more than I do. I guess I was trying to hard to make the article's more appealing and more interesting. I hope you can forgive me.Dbunkley6 (talk) 18:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Raven-Symone "Backflip cover/How To Upload covers

ok here is the actuall [cover] for Raven-Symone's "Backflip". The cover that is on there is the same cover but, there is a problem with the image posted. Oh and can you tell me how to up load photos's so I can upload on my own, so I won't ask other people?Dbunkley6 (talk) 19:00, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Swift discog

Read

(Talk) 23:31, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

It was actually discussed for several months. See:

(Talk) 16:36, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Who Owns My Heart video screenshot

Hey, I really like the double images that are on "Our Song" and "Take It Off". I feel like the video for "Who Owns My Heart" is not accurately represented by one sole screenshot. Where could I find one of those double images? -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 19:20, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, double screen shots are rare use on wikipedia, alot of editors dont like them, its a split argument, some feel they violate copyrights, others dont if they are used and licensed properly. Such as in

WP:NFCC. Which images were you thinking? (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coqbx4C8z0o watch this video and tell me the times of the images you like) - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 19:29, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you so much. I think that one of her when she's applying lipstick and one of her dancing would be great. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 19:50, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Image is located at http://nl.tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2qby8o4&s=7 . All you have to do is upload it. Just a suggestion, the images by themselves fail NFCC (i personally dont really listen to it unless im uploading the image like in Take It Off, then im extremely picky on the image(s) ). They will pass if you plan to use them in a way like how provocative the video was blah blah blah. Something like that. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 20:02, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. A lot of that is stated on what I'm currently working on. Thank you. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 20:13, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You've Earned This!

		The Original Barnstar
		You've earned this for the amazing work you did on (Talk) 05:04, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply ]

Thank you so much. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 18:41, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Regarding This Edit

The singles that you lumped into the full singles list are actually credited to Boys Like Girls and John Mayer respectively. A single only goes into the main list if Swift and her management release it; if another artist releases it (or that other artists' management releases it on that artists' behalf), the single is not considered a Taylor Swift single. However, it is listed separately instead of being discounted entirely because she did feature on the single. This is the way it should be.

To give an example: "Half of My Heart", a song I actually heard on the radio today, is credited to John Mayer. Therefore, it's a John Mayer single, not a Taylor Swift single. Because she contributed vocals to the single and it did chart, it's listed in a separate table. The treatment is entirely correct, as John Mayer's table will list it normally.

Please leave the two separated singles separated, and be wary of making such changes in the future. =) CycloneGU (talk) 01:27, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ipodnano05. You have new messages at CycloneGU's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Also, you ignored the notice on my edit page saying to keep the discussion all at one place here. I would have preferred you do that, but since it's on my talk page now, may as well do that since Yves is also involved. CycloneGU (talk) 03:07, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't see the notice, sorry. And can we continue the conversation tomorrow? I'm really tired and I am willing to help find those sources. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 03:34, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I'll just ask Yves to watch my talkpage so he can keep tabs on it, too. I know he removed some of the unsourced info, and I think some have since been referenced and readded, but there may be other issues that have to be addressed that I might be able to help with. I sadly am gone most of Friday tho., but I may be here briefly in the morning. CycloneGU (talk) 03:45, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No worries; already being watched! (Not in the sketch way.) Yves (talk) 03:48, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, ignore my post on your page then. =) CycloneGU (talk) 03:49, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Taylor Swift - Back to December.png

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:37, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Speak Now (song)

nominate ) 18:03, 24 October 2010 (UTC) Discussion Could you contribute to the discussion here? Thanks in advance. Candyo32 20:24, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply] Orphaned non-free image File:Miley Cyrus See You Again.jpg You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ). PLEASE NOTE: I am a bot , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again. If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request. To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page. If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page. Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:46, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply] See You Again sample [5] Candyo32 00:55, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply] Thank you so much :) ! -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 23:31, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply] File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Hannah Montana Forever.png Thanks for uploading File:Hannah Montana Forever.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{ Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on 48 hours after 13:05, 6 November 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:05, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply ] Your GA nomination of Can't Be Tamed (song) The article Adabow (talk · contribs) 05:27, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply ] Your GA nomination of See You Again The article Talk 14:51, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply ] Hey ipodnano.. Are you there?? talk) 10:29, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply ] I'm sorry. Can you hold the review off a little longer. I'm having a lot of troubles with my Internet connection. I will notify you once my Internet connection is stable. Hopefully, tomorrow will be the day. However, it's not certain. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 20:20, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply] I've extended it to fourteen days. Take your time. Talk 01:40, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply ] Hi ipodnano, you better make it fast.. I see some other(s), fixing "some" things.. Didn't get what I meant? LOL.. Talk 07:56, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply ] Oh boy! Am I glad to see you? Is your net OK now? Talk 03:02, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply ] Sadly, no. I'm doing this with a wonderful phone application that emits wireless internet. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 03:03, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply] Well you see, some user just nominated Talk 03:07, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply ] Did you fix that error? And hope to see you back again soon (as I mentioned above LOL). Talk 03:13, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply ] Yeah, I saw it. I was more than surprised to find that out. It's pretty cool that there are other contributors who can work significantly besides me. And, no problem, will fix. So, hopefully, I will have Internet by next week. AT&T keeps stalling me. It's getting on my last nerve. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 03:16, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply] What's the problem with that sentence though, the GA review doesn't say? -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 03:18, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply] Well, there's a grammar error. Just read it thoroughly.. And also, the live performanced third paragraph needs fixing.. Not second as I mentioned. Talk 03:20, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply ] Well, I'll fix that. Don't worry. Talk 03:27, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply ] Oh how silly of me. I just noticed it was a fragment. I fixed it now. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 03:40, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply] I'll pass it. Can you wait for half an hour please? Talk 03:43, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply ] Passed! Talk 04:26, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply ] Hi again! There is a new nomination of "Mean". Maybe, you should review it. You know a lot about these songs. Just my opinion, don't take me wrong. lol. Talk 11:14, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply ] Britney Spears filmography Hey! Could you please vote in the deletion discussion? Thanks, Xwomanizerx (talk) 05:05, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply] Time of Our Lives Don't know if you were already notified by reviewer, but the article is on hold. Talk 16:06, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply ] Could you look over the comments I've added to the GA review page? There are only a few minor issues left before I can promote to GA. Cavie78 (talk) 13:41, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply] Merry Christmas Let this Christmas bring you the gift of peace and joy! Talk 04:16, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply ] Thank you veryy much. Hope it does the same for you :) !!! -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 03:23, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply] Awww thank you :) Christmas was awesome :) I hope New Year will be the same way too :D Talk 07:19, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply ] I hope so too. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 01:31, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply] Welcome back Nano!! "Mean" has become another GA. I really look forward to work with you on Taylor's Love Story someday ;) Talk 07:44, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply ] Most definitely... but right now I'm finishing "Tim McGraw" and then I'm gonna try to expand on a Spanish album. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 07:48, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply] I really love Miley and Taylor (thought I work on Whitney Houston articles). When I hear Start All Over, I feel like going back to being a thirteen year old =) Tim McGraw is a great song too. Then there is White Horse. I'll be on a break for a few days. So, just leave me a message when you're ready. Right now, I'm uploading clearer Miley and Taylor samples ;) Talk 07:52, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply ] OMG! Thank you. Whitney Houston is an icon. She's amazing. Her voice is to die for. It's amazing for words. I don't really know any of her songs other "I Will Always Love You," which i have on my iPod. I've heard of her recent songs, but haven't taken out the time to listen to them. My favorite Miley songs are "See You Again", "The Climb", and one that's called "Spotlight" (well those are among my favorites. just the ones that came to mind). My favorite Taylor songs are "Our Song", "Love Story", "You Belong with Me" and her ENTIRE new album. That album is just TOOOOOO AMMMAAAZZING. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 08:07, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply] Thank YOU!!!!!! I didn't know you loved Whitney (or Nippy as fans call her)!!! Well, I have two articles on GA Talk 08:14, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply ] But of course I heard it. I love that song. I instantly grew obsessed with it. And thank you for doing that. The sample was in desperate need for a better one. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 09:12, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply] I'll upload others too.. Good luck on the articles buddy :) Talk 16:33, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply ] Taylor Swift Wikiproject proposal I have proposed that a Wikiproject for start 22:55, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply ] Orphaned non-free image File:Party in the U.S.A. cover.png Thanks for uploading You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:35, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply] Hi Well, sorry to bother you, but there are more comments @ Time of Our Lives GA (I want it to be a GA!!). Also, I found this. It has amazing information on the Composition of the song. Hope we can use it. Good luck.. Talk 06:49, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply ] Orphaned non-free image File:Party in the U.S.A. cover.png Thanks for uploading You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 08:18, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply] Jivesh here. Okay. Jivesh • Talk2Me 05:02, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply] Finished. Jivesh • Talk2Me 12:15, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply] Thank you for agrreing to help me. Here it is [6]. Jivesh • Talk2Me 17:12, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply] Thank you wholeheartedly for everything. Jivesh • Talk2Me 17:37, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply] You're welcome. Glad to help. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 18:26, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply] Re:Love Story Ok. Hahaha.. Fine, you can finish the tour. Anyways, I'm not that good in writing, so I've collected many sources and I'll give them to you to complete Love Story. Talk 07:41, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply ] Btw, I linked the Talk 06:10, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply ] Sorry that I didn't answer back before. I read your message but haden't worked up the time to answer you back. Anyways, that sounds great. Finding sources is usually the hardest part. You can leave the list of source on User:Ipodnano05/Sandbox4 starting now. Thank you VERY much. And thanks for linking that on the "Tim McGraw." You're very attentive. I appreciate it a lot. Thanks. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 06:18, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply] Yes I will leave the sources there. As I said before, I love Taylor and Miley. In fact, I started listening to their music first, so I kinda still have that "fan"ism in me =D Thank you. So, I just add the link and title. Is that okay? Talk 06:28, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply ] Yeah. That's more than fine. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 06:29, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply] I've started adding. Please check out and let me know if the way I add is okay or not :) Talk 06:36, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply ] It's great. You can leave the bare urls there. I don't mind. I'll format it later. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 01:34, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply] (→) Done! Good luck :) Talk 09:50, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply ] RE: I'm fine with everything now. Congrats. looking forward to seeing more of your work! Candyo32 - Happy New Year :) 21:01, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply] Thank you :) -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 01:35, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply] Wikipedia Ambassador Program is looking for new Online Ambassadors Hi! I noticed your activity as a Good Article reviewer, and wanted to let you know about the Online Ambassador . We're looking for friendly Wikipedians who are good at reviewing articles and giving feedback to serve as mentors for students who are assigned to write for Wikipedia in their classes. If you're interested, I encourage you to take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors in the coming term. If that's something you want to do, please apply! You can find instructions for applying at WP:ONLINE. The main things we're looking for in Online Ambassadors are friendliness, regular activity (since mentorship is a commitment that spans several months), and the ability to give detailed, substantive feedback on articles (both short new articles, and longer, more mature ones). I hope to hear from you soon.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 20:26, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply] "I Thought I Lost You" hey here is the official [cover] 4 "I Thought I Lost You" by Miley Cyrus & John Travolta. Dbunkley6 (talk) 20:09, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply] That's a fan-made cover. "I Thought I Lost You" was never made a single. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 20:06, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply] Who Owns My Heart I see you've nominated it for a GA. Somebody else fixed the issues pointed out at the review. Also, maybe this and this would be of help to you. Woo, it's been some time since we talked :) Talk 16:36, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply ] That's pretty good for when I work on the album. Thanks! and yess it has. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 08:05, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply] It's almost done. What about "AUS / FRA Digital Download"? Only references to AUS iTunes. Sauloviegas (talk) 16:03, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply] I see this was taking a while, so I added myself the link to the FRA iTunes. Sauloviegas (talk) 16:07, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply] T-Swizzle Hi! Wow, that tour article must have been humongous! Great! Of course Fearless would be great. Lol, but as you know, I'm not so good in writing, but will provide you with links and other information necessary. What do you say? And, the new issue of Talk 10:58, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply ] That's amazing (about Speak Now). And it was. Just look. But Fearless is definitely the next project. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 17:54, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply] Wow, you did an amazing job on the tour article. Okay then, Love Story it is. You're right, doing all the singles and then the album is easier. talk) 04:26, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply ] The Original Barnstar For your amazing work on our talk) 08:08, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply ] Thank you so much! -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 23:27, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply] March 2011 GAN backlog elimination drive a week away here. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. On behalf of my co-coordinator Wizardman, we hope we can see you in March. MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 00:20, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply ] Speedy deletion nomination of File:Party in the U.S.A.png A tag has been placed on section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion , because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~ [ Scott M. Howard ] ~ [ Talk ]:[ Contribs ] ~ 07:25, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply] Wonder World Tour Hey, long time no see! How are you? I've passed Wonder World Tour's GA review, but left you a few comments on Talk:Wonder World Tour/GA1. You should get yourself a peer review and think about taking it to FAC. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:59, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply] I know. Thanks for reviewing the article and I think I'm going to later because right now my computer doesn't work. Right now I'm using someone else's. As soon as the problem is done, I'm going to edit like crazy. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 23:26, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply] Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ipodnano05/Archive_3&oldid=1094571994" Toggle limited content width