User talk:Jdlankin

Have a look at

List of Law & Order episodes (season 1). The table format is easy to follow, so I hope you'll be able to improve those articles initially. I've been cleaning up and improving the main List of Law & Order episodes pages, and will be heading off to do the other seasons next, so I would appreciate if you could help. :) \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 20:53, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you for the feedback. I see what you mean by the Simpsons articles. I started by noticing on the List of Law & Order episodes page that even shorter articles had already been created with only the six main cast members and the short summaries. Since these shorter articles had been created and not challenged, I added guest cast to them and then created other articles by following the same pattern. Now that at least some of my additions have been reversed, these articles remain in their originally shorter form. I will add more detail to my future submissions. But I'm not clear as to why these originally skeleton articles were created or remain unchanged.

Jdlankin (talk) 08:46, 20 October 2009 (UTC)jdlankin[reply]

Hello, Jdlankin. You have new messages at Atif.t2's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thank you for the feedback. I see what you mean by the Simpsons articles. I started by noticing on the List of Law & Order episodes page that even shorter articles had already been created with only the six main cast members and the short summaries. Since these shorter articles had been created and not challenged, I added guest cast to them and then created other articles by following the same pattern. Now that at least some of my additions have been reversed, these articles remain in their originally shorter form. I will add more detail to my future submissions. But I'm not clear as to why these originally skeleton articles were created or remain unchanged.

Jdlankin (talk) 16:49, 17 October 2009 (UTC)Jdlankin[reply]

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kenneth D. Taylor, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Victoria College and BA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:13, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I noticed that you have changed some date formats recently in several articles. Please don't change the format of dates where an article has evolved using predominantly one format. As a general rule, the dates should be left in the format they were originally written in, unless there are reasons for changing it based on strong national ties to the topic. It is also important to maintain a consistent format throughout the article. You can find more information at

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tom Flanagan (political scientist) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• has to happen (Flanagan 2008:195). |source=Flanagan, 2000. ''First Nations? Second Thoughts'' p.195) |width = 75% |align = center }}
• think tanks and to other academics and is perceived as polarizing and divisive (Troy 2012).</ref>).-->

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

Hi! I noticed you made an edit to John Steinbeck that broke the formatting of the table of Steinbeck's writing. Please, when you make an edit, check the results in the preview, making sure that you have not accidently created problems. Editing tables are not the easiest kind of edit to make; as you can see, if you look at the table after your edit, there may be unintended consequences. I have reverted your edit. If you wish to add information to the table, I suggest that you copy the source code for the table to your sandbox and experiment there before making the edit to the Steinbeck article. — Neonorange (talk) 16:09, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Steinbeck, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Short Stories. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michael Bear Carson and Suzan Carson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Devil You Know. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I noticed your recent changes to