User talk:Jmbernard86

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wisdom89 (talk) 06:51, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another editor has added the {{

Your recent addition to Bray Cary has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. youngamerican (wtf?) 01:35, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am not quite sure why you decided to blank entire pages and redirect them to their parent stations but I would suggest you not do that again. That definitely looked like several cases of vandalism. I won't mark you for it now, but you really need to explain those edits. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 03:24, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have brought this to ANI, you may reply there. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 04:23, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ETRF-TV. Since you had some involvement with the ETRF-TV redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Neutralhomer • Talk • 03:27, 9 July 2010 (UTC) 03:27, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect GTRF-TV. Since you had some involvement with the GTRF-TV redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Neutralhomer • Talk • 03:28, 9 July 2010 (UTC) 03:28, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect EBOY-TV. Since you had some involvement with the EBOY-TV redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Neutralhomer • Talk • 03:28, 9 July 2010 (UTC) 03:28, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright

infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 04:50, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Your addition to Bray Cary has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 04:52, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bray Cary

The article

source

that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Kindzmarauli (talk) 05:06, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Proposed deletion of File:Rolandmaxwell.jpg

The file File:Rolandmaxwell.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

talk) 01:01, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply

]