User talk:Joolz

You expressed a desire on the

Hey there Joolz, just to let you know, I have added information about the price competition between alcohol fuel and gasoline on the article. Can you check it out and tell me what you think about it? Be sure to reply on my user page, and I will reply on your user page. —

Hi. I've added a controversial template to the talk page of this article. I would like to find out which aspects of the article you still feel are POV or misrepresent the debate/field. --Sf 09:22, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, I haven't really looked at that article in a while but I don't think I have any problems with the article as it stands (I've removed the POV tag, if anyone disputes it I'm sure they'll just add it back!) -- Joolz 13:18, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks this is one of those issues that really polarises people. Have heard of people nearly coming to blows at international conferences - so I agree its likely the POV tag will reappear. It needs a bit more input but its hard to discuss/explain the issues without digressing considerably from the main topic. Anyway have a nice weekend! --Sf 14:46, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm not having it. It's a lie. In the real world it would be libel. Leonig Mig 18:44, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pleased to inform you that you are now an

Congratulations indeed! And thanks for your support on my RfA; I was shocked by how much support it drew. -Splash 13:26, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Congratulations, and you're quite welcome! --Merovingian (t) (c) 14:22, September 9, 2005 (UTC)
• Congratulations on your new mop! the wub "?/!" 15:01, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Now you have those wicked awesome Admin powers (or so I've been told). ;-) hydnjo talk 19:06, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks :) -- Joolz 19:14, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• What's the big deal? It's only a mop. ;-) Congratulations! -- BD2412 ^talk 19:28, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Good point, and it's partly your fault that I'm holding it! dammit.. ;) -- Joolz 19:49, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on being made an admin! I thought you might like to know of a javascript tool that may help in your editing by giving easy access to many admin features. It's described at Wikipedia:Tools#Navigation_popups. The quick version of the installation procedure for admins is paste the following into User:Joolz/monobook.js:

// [[User:Lupin/popups.js]] - please include this line 

document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="' 
             + 'http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Lupin/popups.js' 
             + '&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&dontcountme=s"></script>');

popupAdminLinks=true;

Give it a try and let me know if you find any glitches or have suggestions for improvements! Lupin 02:54, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll give it a go :) - Joolz 12:11, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Normally, I do not vote on RfAs for nominees with >2000 edits. Reason; almost all RfAs for nominees with edit counts higher than that are approved. Thus, it's a fair bit of a waste of time for me to analyze nominees with larger edit counts. I did in your case because several people voted in favor of you before you even accepted and answered the questions. So, I placed a "neutral" vote to highlight that and then changed it to the obviously well warranted "support" after you accepted/answered. I'm sure you'll make a fine admin. Unanimous 31-0 decision, TKO in the 1st round :) --Durin 13:59, 9 September 2005 (UTC) (PS: If you're really bored and unusually curious, you can have a look at my admin voting measures...if you fall asleep, don't blame me :))[reply]

Well, thanks again :) It's good that you look at it in that much detail, I think there's been a recent trend on

RFA for people to look at the number of edits and vote based mainly on that, nobody mentioned edit counts at all on mine but that's probably because of the high number. By the way... I think it was 35-0 not that it matters ;) - Joolz 15:22, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply

]

• I think the two main factors people usually vote by are edit count and time since first edit. Both are rather poor measures of a nominees suitability to be an admin. Some people really investigate potential admins and vote based on other items than edit count/time on wikipedia. Most don't though. :( --Durin 18:54, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, Joolz! I took the liberty of placing a "Welcome to the EU project" message on the talk page of User:Jdhowens90, who had recently added his name to the list of participants on the project page. And, also, congratulations on your recent promotion to Admin status! :) LiniShu 11:48, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) -- Joolz 13:22, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for the edit on my gallery. I can't believe that that mistake got in there—my wife (who is Scottish) would have killed me if she had seen it!  :-O

BTW: On the constituency WikiProject your suggestion about the historic constituencies is more what I was thinking of. Rather than expanding the /Progess sub-page, I am thinking to create a /Historic_constituencies sub-page. JeremyA (talk) 21:44, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm always glad to fix embarrassing errors like that! ;) Creating a historic constituency subpage (I'd prefer 'former' because 'historic' sounds rather glorifying for some of the more recent constituencies, not that it really matters...) is a good idea, I think it should be located as a subpage of the Progress page too though. There are a large number of former scottish constituencies where we have the 2001 results on the page of a new 2005 constituency, which needs sorting out as well. -- Joolz 11:08, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on your adminship! I hope you don't mind receiving it. :) =Nichalp «Talk»= 11:25, September 12, 2005 (UTC)

Wow, well, thanks :D I wouldn't normally be too pleased to receive a bin, but I'll make a special exception in this case ;) -- Joolz 15:07, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I know this is not the appropriate place for this kind of query, but I can find no more information otherwise. You have added some information to a Wiki for Aaron Laberge who was a college roommate and good friend of mine. I was hoping that, if you know how to contact him, you could either give me his email address or pass mine along to him. Anyway, please contact me either way. Thanks, [email protected]

• Responded on User talk:24.199.188.146 -- Joolz 23:17, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi: The long silence was an unplanned wikibreak. It is my opinion that mediation is always worth trying. —Theo (Talk) 17:26, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

When are you going to university? --

Francs2000 00:50, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply

• I'm off on saturday -- Joolz 00:54, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oh well best of luck if I don't see you before! --
    Francs2000 00:58, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    • Thanks :) -- Joolz 01:04, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. You deleted

You're right, I'm sorry, my mistake. It didn't click that they were both part of the same AFD, usually other articles are listed in the title of the AFD so I just missed it, I'll delete it now :) (well, I say now... but I'm on dialup so..) Thanks, Joolz

Considering the length of the discussion I've now written an abbreviation of the essence of the discussion at Talk:Cult of personality#Fidel_Castro that, in my view, settles the matter. Maybe you'd like to have a look and have another say on the subject.

I've also sent this message to the other previous contributors to the discussion, Cryptnotic, TJive, Mihnea Tudoreanu and Willmc. DirkvdM 09:26, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message, unfortuantly I don't have the time right now to look into it, I will try when I can have some time, regards, Joolz 22:39, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well, nothing has changed for you, really, because you've already seen the 'ultimate' argument. Just thought I should point this out to you. DirkvdM 09:52, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oops - I knew I'd forgotten to do something. Still, I figured seeing as nobody had done much to the last article by Saturday (the last time I looked at it) then it's wouldn't harm to leave it a bit longer. --

Francs2000 21:51, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply

Hi Joolz, this is just a note telling you that I have created the European Union collaboration (the first collaboration is Eurobarometer). I'm looking forward to your contributions! Talrias (t | e | c) 12:11, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message, I'll try and contribute where I can but I've been rather busy at university recently. Good luck also on your arbcom candidacy :) -- Joolz 13:35, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joolz, long time no talk. I hope you're enjoying the drinking University.;) I was wondering if you could help me with an issue. A while back, when I was even wetter behind the ears than I am now, I uploaded an image on en.wiki, not knowing about the commons. I might be using the image soon in a major article rewrite, and have uploaded a hi-res version of the image on the commons. I also added a more detailed caption. However, it won't express because of the local copy. Do you mind deleting the local page? It's here. Thanks ever so much! encephalon 18:05, 15 October 2005 (UTC) PS. I'm the only one who's ever edited the page, and also it's orphaned.[reply]

Sorry for the delay in responding to this, the image has been deleted :) -- Joolz 12:25, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed that you're studying at Sussex. I'm up the road in Lewes. Are you still contirbuting the the parliamentary stuff? I uploaded the booklet I mentioned some time ago to the Wikimedia commons at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Lewes_Parliament_1295-1885.pdf. Jooler 11:55, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I am, my wikipedia activity has decreased a lot though, but I'll help out with the Lewes constituency as soon as I have some spare time, probably after next week. Regards, Joolz 20:11, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

OK, so I finally found time for some Wikipeding (after about five months of Northumberland!) and have picked Nottinghamshire for the next COTM. I've added a to do list to the talk page and have already started work adding some of the basic data. Joe D (t) 04:30, 11 December 2005 (UTC) P.S. To stop receiving updates, unsubscribe at

Hi, the new COTM is Norfolk! Joe D (t) 23:09, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this month's COTM is

User:Francs2000/Christmas

--

Francs2000 09:30, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply

Congratulations, and merry christmas + happy new year :) -- Joolz 17:10, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed on the

The older results were from the book listed in the references section, which is available in any good library - I'll try and get the results for Kemptown in the near (ish) future - especially since I'm living in Brighton and Hove now -- Joolz 08:36, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please can you check

I've had another look at the map and corrected the mistake, cheers - Joolz 13:32, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you - CarolGray 16:54, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, is Benham Park the same as Benham-Valence Manor? I am not familiar with the term "Park" except as applied to land areas which may have manicured lawns or groves of trees, etc. for recreational purposes. I have some information which I should like to add to the page "Benham Park" if it applies, i.e. it is about the manor of Benham-Valence, the "house" as it were. Cheers. Mfields1 00:30, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've done a bit of research (I'm assuming you're asking because of the Marsh Benham page, since there isn't a page for Benham Park yet) - according to [1] they do seem to refer to the same thing - the definition for the term park is pretty broad and can be applied to lots of different types of land. Hope I've helped, and happy editing :) -- Joolz 11:07, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you have been editing the Vlaams Belang and Vlaams Blok articles in the past. Could I ask you a question ?

I was thinking of starting an article on the Vlaams Blok trial, to explore the trial a little more indepth, and to which could be linked from the Vlaams Belang and Vlaams Blok pages. What would you think about that ?

I'm afraid I would just be creating another battle-ground. On the other hand, the information on the trial in the present articles is rather limited.--LucVerhelst 17:09, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joolz

Way back when, you made this addition to the Berwick-upon-Tweed (UK Parliament constituency) article:

The seat has sent members to Parliament since 1482 when it was enfranchised by Henry VIII. It initially sent two members, this was reduced to one in 1885.

An anonymous user has pointed out (in article) that either the date or the King must be incorrect, as Henry VIII wasn't born until 1492. Any idea which it is?

I will remove the comment to the talk page.

Thanks AndrewMcQ 18:31, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, You added

I'm having the same problem with it, it was down to the & in the name (which I don't think was a problem when I uploaded it, else I would have noticed) - I've now uploaded the picture with 'and' in the name, and fixed the articles it's used in, sorry about that, and keep up the good work with the article! :) -- Joolz 17:42, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi, and welcome to the Brighton WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of everything to do with the city of Brighton and Hove.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Unisouth

14:22, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi,

Firstly just to say great work on all the web pages on the EU.

I am new to Wikipedia so don't know if I am doing this correctly but on noted on this page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_rome

that you did not acknowledge that the European Economic and Social Committee was established by the Treaty of Rome and instead you have put 1967 for it, while the page on the EESC has the correct date of 1957?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_and_Social_Committee

Thanks

J

An image you uploaded,

I have had the idea of expanding and renaming WikiProject Brighton to become WikiProject Sussex - this would not exclude people with a particular interest in, say, Chichester, Arundel, Worthing, Midhurst, Pulborough, Billingshurst, Horsham, Crawley, East Grinstead, Haywards Heath, Lewes, Eastbourne, Hastings, Rye, Winchelsea, etc. - all places worthy of a WikiProject - and I'm not sure that having WikiProject Brighton as a sub-project of WP:Sussex would work. I feel that we are being too exclusive - we could attract new members this way. What do you think? - Vox Humana 8' 17:34, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

Harry Roberts (murderer), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Roberts (murderer). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SilkTork *^YES! 19:46, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

An article you created maybe deleted soon: Tools which can help you

Harry Roberts (murderer)

may be deleted from Wikipedia.

There is an ongoing debate about whether the article you created should be deleted here:

• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Roberts (murderer).

The faster you respond on this page, the better chance the article you created can be saved.

Finding sources which mention the topic of the article you created is the very best way to avoid an article being deleted {{

Findsources3

}}:

Find sources for Harry Roberts (murderer): google news recent, google news old, google books, google scholar, NYT recent, NYT old, a9, msbooks, msacademic ...You can then cite these results in the Article for deletion discussion.

Also, there are several tools and helpful editors on Wikipedia who can help you:

1. List the page on

Article Rescue Squadron. You can get help listing your page on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page

.

2. At any time, you can ask any administrator to move your article to a special page. (Called userfication)

3. You can request a mentor to help you:

Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User

. But don't wait for a mentor to respond to you before responding on the article for deletion page.

4. When trying to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. These acronyms don't need to intimidate you. Here is a list of acronyms you can use yourself: Deletion debate acronyms, which will help you argue that the article should be kept.

If the page you created is deleted, you also

talk) 20:44, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

AfD

Please see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loony leftBorock (talk) 08:19, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a

talk) 19:29, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a

talk) 17:24, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. WilliamH (talk) 01:54, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of change

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the

WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

First ever Brighton Wiki Meetup

You are invited to the first Brighton Wiki Meetup which will take place at The West Quay, Brighton Marina Village, Brighton BN2 5UT on Sunday 28 April 2013 from 1.00 pm. If you have never been to one, this is an opportunity to meet other Wikipedians in an informal atmosphere for Wiki and non-Wiki related chat and for beer or food if you like. Experienced and new contributors are all welcome. This event is definitely not restricted just to discussion of Brighton topics. Bring your laptop if you like and use the free Wifi or just bring yourself. Even better, bring a friend! Click the link for full details. Looking forward to seeing you. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:03, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:William George Mount.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:William George Mount.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the

image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:34, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom Elections 2016

: Voting now open!

Hello, Joolz. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Joolz. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply ]

Category:European Parliament constituencies in the United Kingdom has been nominated for renaming to Category:Former European Parliament constituencies in the United Kingdom

Category:European Parliament constituencies in the United Kingdom has been nominated for renaming to Category:Former European Parliament constituencies in the United Kingdom. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 12:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]