A tag has been placed on

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:49, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:40, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain why you moved

The article Ashfield Independents has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This isn't a political party, it is one or two independent councillors in Ashfield, and they aren't notable. I can't find any news coverage of them as a group, only a few passing references to one of their councillors, Roy Adkins (and he's not a notable person).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

Thanks for uploading File:UK general election results.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:52, 20 March 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 12:52, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:UK general election results.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  here
  .

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 12:52, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Butting in here — facts are not copyrightable. My non-lawyer take on this is that you can probably reproduce recreate the chart without copyright problems, even if you can't use the exact file. --Trovatore (talk) 18:11, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, of course this analysis — for which I take no responsibility, in case anyone should get in copyright trouble — is based on my limited understanding of US law. That's mostly what matters here, given that the servers are in the US. But if you're in the UK, could things be different for you personally? No idea. --Trovatore (talk) 07:40, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 22:22, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a

(delivered by mabdul 23:49, 3 December 2012 (UTC))[reply]

As one of the previous contributors to {{

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cotw1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Magioladitis (talk) 18:09, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Just letting you know that the list has been pulled from TFL due to a dispute. Giants2008 (Talk) 15:47, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article has now been re-scheduled for December 18. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:22, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

Template:Collab-eu has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:31, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Collab-uk has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:39, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Newcotw has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:55, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Tirben-flag.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image. A proposed flag for a micronation of wikipedia editors which existed on IRC and a

WP:NOTWEBHOST

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  ★  Bigr Tex 03:08, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]